How can anyone doubt the NWO is the end goal when..

Discussion in 'Conspiracy' started by AmericanTerrorist, May 21, 2013.

  1. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    Where?
     
  2. Zzap

    Zzap Member

    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    21
    for the most part YES

    he says it in his video

    proven over and over, watch the documentaries.

    unlike chemo, its nothing more than nontoxic proteins and amino acids, and CURES not puts you into remission it CURES

    The us government and its corporations, agencies, and banks are terrorizing the people of this country, to protect their monopolies.
     
  3. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    Well then, it must be true!
    I will sit through his PR video when I have some time.

    To be fair, he doesn't seem to discount 'chemo'.

    Ho-hum - if you say so.
     
  4. Zzap

    Zzap Member

    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    21
    you shouldnt ridicule what you do not understand.
     
  5. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    It's not ridicule, it's cynicism.
     
  6. Zzap

    Zzap Member

    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    21
    Ho-hum - if you say so.
     
  7. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    21,084
    Likes Received:
    15,314
    Zzap,

    I have been staying out of the posts that you are havering with Odon, and others to concentrate on the Holdren issue. Just wanted to point that out.

    I was responding to STP's post
    In response to this I did a small search to see what this was about. I included this: From PolitiFact:
    Included as additional information about the book in question, as I think it is only fair to hear both sides.


    In response you posted about forced sterilization that occurred in the '70s, before the book was written, and independant of anything Holdren had anything to do with. You then used this instance that occurred between1973 and 76, to say:
    Thus using one three year instance to condemn the entire system of government in the U.S. completely disregarding over 200 years of good and bad governmental actions.

    I pointed out this fact and that you had changed the subject from Holdren to the Indian Health Services, to which Holdren had no connection.

    So you then almost spit up your coffee and jumped from your example of one bad law condemning the entire governmental system to
    Thereby reenforcing your statement that all government is bad by implying that there are, and never have been, any laws anyway.

    This set you up to rant about the courts, Holdren, government in general, Representative Republics, and the Amendment procedure.

    You end by declaring that the only way to change government is by
    Question:
    How did you get to armed rebellion from a discussion of the textbook Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, co authored by Holdren? And remember it is a textbook and textbooks are notorious for being inaccurate, bias, and written with specific agendas.
     
  8. StpLSD25

    StpLSD25 Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    11
  9. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    He basically tells you you are talking shit. So, prove him wrong.
     
  10. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    21,084
    Likes Received:
    15,314
    Looks like a clear case of harassment for publicity sake.

    He publicly and very courteously gave his response to the question with cameras present in some sort of meeting or presentation.

    When the answer wasn't to liking of the questioner's party they pursued him outdoors. He told them to go away, which is his Constitutional right. They did not go away but continued to pursue him. They were then told by the police to leave private property or be subject to arrest. They have no right to enter private property without permission.

    Looks like he reacted very well.
     
  11. Zzap

    Zzap Member

    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    21
    from your link:

    In a section on "Involuntary Fertility Control," Holdren and the other authors discuss various "coercive" means of population control — including putting sterilants in the drinking water.

    so what the problem?
     
  12. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    I think you may have forgot to read a couple of posts....
     
  13. Zzap

    Zzap Member

    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    21
    That was a partial initial response to meagain. seems pretty clear to me.
     
  14. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    21,084
    Likes Received:
    15,314
    Discussing certain scenarios is not advocating the same.
     
  15. StpLSD25

    StpLSD25 Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    11
    I disagree. I think all of this ties in together. That book talks about adding substances to the drinking water. Notice the video I posted he says "It would never be accepted," in the meantime, government is still adding deadly Chemicals to our food and water. Read this article from the World Health Organization, about fluoride/arsenic in our drinking water.

    http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/en/poster8.pdf
     
  16. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    It ties together about as well (pardon the pun) as my three year old nephew ties his shoe laces...(he doesn't)

    Blurb on the left...

    China
    Millions of children are exposed to excessive amounts of fluoride through drinking water contaminated from natural geological sources.

    In China, the burning of fluoriderich coal adds to the problem.

    Small amounts of fluoride are good for teeth; it is added to toothpaste and, in some countries, to drinking water.
    At higher doses, it destroys teeth and accumulates in bones, leading to crippling skeletal damage.
    With their bodies still growing, children are most at risk.
    Like fluoride, arsenic is widely distributed throughout the earth's crust, and is present in almost all
    waters in very small amounts
    .
    In certain areas, however, there are dangerous levels of this toxin in children’s drinking water.
    The most tragic example is Bangladesh, where thousands of wells are causing a mass poisoning of the population.
    Unsafe wells are marked with red paint, warning people that this water is
    not for drinking.
     
  17. StpLSD25

    StpLSD25 Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    11
    That doesn't change the fact the is Arsenic and Fluoride in our water, as well as many other chemicals. It causes cancer. Plus there is virtually no difference in teeth between fluoridated- non-fluoridated water. This tells me there's another motive. You can believe as you wish, but America is one of the ONLY countries that don't require GMO's to be labeled.
     
  18. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    21,084
    Likes Received:
    15,314
    You have now switched from Holdren and Involuntary Fertility Control to the government adding deadly chemicals to our food and water, thus again avoiding the original discussion.

    And you are now discussing the government adding deadly chemicals to our food and water.

    By your reasoning, because you are discussing it, you advocate it.
     
  19. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    Yes, Arsenic and flouride is in most peoples water - in small doses.
    Because it is a nat...heck, did you not read your own link?
    It doesn't say anybody is adding arsenic to drinking water.
    So, it really doesn't link to anything, really, does it?

    From your own link: 'Small amounts of fluoride are good for teeth'

    So can you. This wasn't your best argument, to be fair.
    Don't you find it slightly laboured and forced?

    Is one? - so not the only one? So what's your point?

    P.S - you do realise you're using a United Nations 'fact sheet' don't you?
     
  20. StpLSD25

    StpLSD25 Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    11
    With what? the Fluoride.

    Yeah, it's all starting to feel forced, cause I know as soon as I say something, Liberals are going to be jumping at me like Paranas. Even places like Japan requires labeling of GMOs.America is probably the only country in the modern world, but I'm not positive. I'm saying, Idc what you guys "say" to deter the point. Everytime one turns on the TV, they're announcing another bad drug. I met a kid who was diagnosed as "bi polar" at 5 years old, and 10 years later he was full-blown stitzo.

    But I know I'm not going to change your mind, if you're actually defending gmo's
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice