How can anyone doubt the NWO is the end goal when..

you however have a huge problem when you post what amounts to nothing more than hit pieces to back your story.

It does not change the fact that the FDA stole his patents.

Apparently in your mind that is something the FDA always does when an invention does not work and the product is a fraud.

Your higher reasoning skills are glowing in the dark again and its clear you support suppression of effective cancer treatment.

 

When I saw that I nearly spit my coffee up, I laughed so hard!

"One bad law"

There are in the US alone over 62million (so called) laws.

I could post several pages of "one bad law" (s) that violate and trespass my rights direct from the supreme courts and volumes from the supreme courts of the 50 states.

Seriously no one needs to be a rocket scientist to realize that when PUBLIC court decisions of appellate courts are shoved into the "UNPUBLISHED" category and cannot be used by litigants, and the supreme court can simply toss your case eternally on the bottom of the stack and tell you to fuck off and piss up a rope, among countless other "tricks of the trade" that there is something grossly rotten in dodge in the "Just-Us" club.

Holden is part of government, government is organizing the world scene which is in fact the topic is it not?

You dont get to vote on anything that would change government! Vote on any good amendments lately? How about EVER?

If you think we have "real" power to change government short of armed rebellion then how come the people never get what they want and instead only get some bastardized version of what the government will "give" them?

 

Zzap

You are repeating yourself now.

Maybe throw in WTC7 falling down to liven things up...

 

You asked:

I did, and...

I found cases where 'patients' were being ripped off, and a 'treatment' that included 'regular' cancer treatment, along with something known but re-named.
If you know of any people where the treatment worked, and were 'cured' - please do share.

 

Yes unfortunately that is necessary when someones fingers are stuck in their ears.

Maybe not, you are doing just fine.

 

I heard you. You are saying: seen and unseen shareholders - who are basically the people that originally owned the companies Exxon Mobil - still own it...
...it's just you can't prove it.

 

were they?

I found your cases to say "maybe" and coulda shoulda probly. Laughable frankly.

The medical industry was murdering everyone with brain tumors and burzynski was curing them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1buiXWr_QTQ"]Burzynski | 2-DVD Set Extended Edition Montage Preview of New Material | Cancer Is Serious Business - YouTube

 

no you apparently have little knowledge of how these things actually work. (like wtc 7) lol

I said "controlling interest", look up the difference between controlling interest and ownership.

 

If you are now saying 'controlling interests' ...

Seen and unseen shareholders - who are basically the people that originally owned the companies Exxon Mobil - still have a 'controlling interest'
...it's just you can't prove it.

 

Where does it say: 'maybe we lost $2300' 'maybe we were $20,000 poorer' ?

'antineoplastons'

'If you know of any people where the treatment worked, and were 'cured' - please do share.'

 

No its what I said from the beginning, you are first now starting to add it up.

I proved they had original ownership, it is you cant prove they no longer have a controlling interest 100 years later in which they do not need ownership. LOL

 

No you didn't.

Neither can you prove they do...

 

if you are trying to imply that every person with cancer is treatable successfully then you are being seriously disingenuous arent you.

There is no way you could have watched that clip in this amount of time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBUGVkmmwbk"]BURZYNSKI: "CANCER IS" Serious "BUSINESS" - Eric Merola

 

stop trying to put your failure and inability to produce on me

you defend and support the same system that is not only oppressing you but killing you.

 

Mr. Writer, you would say anything to defend your beloved Obama/Democratic party.

You've build an imaginary "house of cards," in which, if you can disprove 1 thing I say (even with faulty info such as yours) then, it ALL must be wrong.

You've totally ignored toxins like Arsenic being placed in our water, and Obama's incredible protection of GMO's. A new study in Pigs show GMO-fed pigs have a much higher chance of stomach ulsors and kidney problems. Medications on a large scale, cause other illnesses/death. We're constantly at war, and your massiah Obama is ripping up the Constitution with every new law. All this is reasons not to trust the official story. As for the Monsanto-Controlled EPA and FDA, of course they're going to say GMO's are "totally safe." We don't know what adverse health effects they have, but you guys are demozing me for asking important questions, ignoring the most important ones, and saying I'm wrong because of trivial details.

 

No I am not. I am talking about 'antineoplastons' - the 'positive' e.g's I have seen mention that alone.
http://www.burzynskipatientgroup.org/lester-mouscher
The e.g's I gave mention other 'conventional' drugs, too.

 

I don't have to produce anything, and it seems you feel the same way, too.

 

his focus work is on brainstem glioma in which the medical industry that you are defending and protecting had a ZERO success rate while he cures more than not.

You did not catch in your hit piece antineoplastons are NOT chemo because you do not understand this!

All you continue to do is cut paste and throw shit at the wall hoping something will stick. LOL

 

actually I did, that is not what this is about, you turned it into a debate about your failure to recognize your broken nose.

 

Jeez, I'm saying is it ONLY ' 'antineoplastons' ' that is curing his patients.
Is there any e.g's?
He can no longer or does no longer mention ' 'antineoplastons' on his website.

I didn't say it was.