in your opinion it also depends upon how the lie is weighted I personally have a static fairly heavy weight for lies if I were to say "well they'll never find out so no damage done" it'd be bad reasoning, as it is as the system works now, it's perfectly good reasoning
poor reasoning. The fact that you can posit the weight of the outcome of a lie in comparison to anything else shows as much. No matter how much you want it to be relative.
clever! but I spoke to soon with what I said although, I wouldnt seriously want someone to lie to make me feel better. How come I knew this thread would be dangerous?
loving the use of dangerous, I must say. But seriously folks, how do you propose we deal with the categorical imperative?
weigh a lie the same as a cold blooded murder and feel that they are only imperitive if one will halt the other or greater.......
we could do that, but then they might call us gypsys or something. I for one can't tell the future. Unless I live in a fantasy world where I know for absolute certain that such and such events are corresponding and will transpire.
I don't know.... all those typos.... people here don't like mispellers (you should hear the shit I get for it) we might end up lowering our credibility letting someone who has that sort of typoage participate.....
fuck, i cant help my spelling, its a problem....i know i'm a smart person though. actually....you two are making me feel slightly stupid.
just down some hard liquor, we'll piss you off so much you won't be able to feel slightly stupid any more.... (and I was making a joke about hipocrisy, come on, take it, chuckle, it was subtle, but, I mean come on..... I need to start tagging again....)
then we've lied, we were wrong, we had a better then half probability of being right, we tried, I don't feel the occasion of this occuring is going to be so often that one will become too incredible from it....
