Hillary Clinton

I just wanted to convey the general discourse without going into too much detail.

 

I'm sorry, but this post of yours clearly indicates that you are the one who introduced the credibility of the FBI into this discussion as a way to prove your point about Hillary's guilt. Therefore, it is not out of line for me to address their credibility as a way to disprove your point.

 

You asked others whether or not they had faith in the FBI. You asked if they believed that the FBI was corrupt. You asked those questions as a way to bolster your position that Hillary Clinton is not guilty of any crimes. I took issue with that position, and so I provided evidence of FBI corruption, thereby putting their credibility in question. This is not about the FBI. It is about the credibility of the organization you are pointing to for the purpose of proving Hillary's innocence.

 

If you think Hillary is too corrupt to be President then don't vote for her. She's been cleared of any wrongdoing, whether she deserves to be cleared or not. Get over it.

On the other hand you know Trump is too corrupt to be President, so don't vote for him either.

So in this case either don't vote or vote third party. Either way it's a waste of a vote but at least if you vote third parry you'll be making a statement.

 

No one ever listens to that statement though...

 

Yeah, I hear what you're saying. You're saying that just because an organization can be shown to have repeatedly been found to be making up--or withholding--evidence (in other words, lying), it doesn't mean you can't trust them. I'm sorry, but I have a higher standard than you do when it comes to credibility. Your appeal to authority, especially in this case, does not serve your point.

 

This is gold

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrkPe-9rM1Q

 

Yeah, that's pretty funny.

 

Everybody just relax...we only got to make it till 2020 and then we can redo this whole damn thing.

 

I sure as Hell don't want the person who robbed the bank 108 times running the bank.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/09/20/hillary-clintons-it-guy-asked-reddit-for-help-altering-emails-a-twitter-sleuth-claims/

Sooo reddit users have identified a user who questioned how to delete certain information from emails as Hillary's IT guy

 

Yep

 

Oh didnt see someone else has already posted about it

 

I already know how the narrative will go on this go..something like, IT dude didnt tell Hillary what he did so there was no intent on her part to commit a crime.

 

I don't think this IT guy stuff will make any difference. Clinton already took the hit over the e-mail thing, it's nothing new. No one is going to be any more pissed off about it because of this. Plus, her base and most sane voters do not particularly care about this kind of stuff.

 

Well, since you asked.

FBI director Comey said that "although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgement is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case," and then added, "prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past."
___________________________________________________________________

You take him at his word, right?

 

Yes, no sane person would care if their commander in chief doesn't know how to handle classified information.

 

yeah, can't wait.

 

Hillary people come of sounding utterly mad.