Heshouldnotrun.org

I'm also open to changing my mind based on policy platforms and debate.

Moderates don't make good bumper sticker slogans/tweets though.

 

You're entitled to vote for whomever you please. Whether or not (s)he wins is another story. I don't think there was ever a time when sniffing and kissing the hair of a woman who was not a very intimate acquaintance was anything but weird at best, but Biden says he doesn't remember doing it. I hope Biden doesn't enter the race, because he's now damaged goods. Wait till the Republican smear machine goes into action, and we'll see how the Bern and the others fare. I'm not optimistic. They went easy on Bernie last time because they viewed his supporters as a weapon against Hillary. Here in Oklahoma the Republicans are sure to play up "New York", "Jewish", "Atheist", "Socialist"--none of which go over well with Bible Belt voters. Thr abortion issue is sure to come into play. American voters, especially Democrats, are suckers for the disinformation Republicans are skilled at putting out, with or without Russian help. Trump's re-election may be a Pyrric victory for # Me Too.

 

Thanks for sharing, but in light of your susceptibility to Pizzagate-style smear jobs, should we posilby ask further about the source of your video and what exactly it's depciting? Is he sniffing her hair or whispering in her ear. It's well-established that Joe is a touchy feely person, but at least one woman who was the subject of these photos says it was completely misrepresented, and that he was whispering words of support to her at a time when she needed it. 'I Thought It Would All Blow Over': Stephanie Carter Says Photo With Joe Biden Was Misrepresented Ex-Defense secretary’s wife says photo of her with Biden misleading

 

I don't know the source, but you obviously just looked at the picture on the front of the video and are focusing on that. I don't know who Stephanie Carter is. I don't care about what is being whispered in her ear. It's just a video of him touching children inappropriately. You yourself have said that his touching is inappropriate. Is he a child molester? I don't know. That's your bag. I'm not really interested.

There have been posts of men hugging, so I just thought I'd show actual examples of what Joe Biden has done. And this video seems to focus on children. And his behavior is wildly inappropriate. And there's nothing wrong whatsoever with being susceptible to Pizzagate-style stories. In fact, pedophiles in high places do exist. Just look at Dennis Hastert and Sir Jimmy Saville. I mean, I'm sorry to inform you that there is a well-established string of pedophiles in positions of power. I think most people already realize this. And yes, I do think aspects of pizzagate warranted further investigation, such as why Bill Clinton was flying on Jeffrey Epstein's underage sex airplane.

I'm really terribly sorry that Joe Biden seems to have a habit of touching children inappropriately, though. I would NEVER touch children like he does. He shouldn't be whispering ANYTHING in their ears. It doesn't matter if he's saying, "HOLY MOLY! YOU'RE THE BEST!" or not. It's disturbing behavior. Certainly not behavior one with any manners whatsoever would conduct themselves with in front of a child's parents, to whisper something secret into their child's ear while holding their breast or caressing their skin. I'm not saying Joe's a pedo, necessarily, but I do know this...MY kid would not be allowed within fifty yards of the man.

If I'm wrong, then you go ahead and do it with some dude's kid and see what happens.

 

Bernie has a low tolerance for bullshit and a single minded focus on policy. He doesnt get distracted from it easily. Maybe that will be enough to carry him through the smear campaign.

I've got my eye on this Pete Buttigieg character too. The democrats might have a dark horse with him.

 

Maybe it will be, or maybe he won't have the slightest clue how to handle it when he is smeared. He never seems prepared for the smear. Kind of innocent in that way. Like he wasn't prepared for the whole "reparations" set-up either. He might flounder a bit.

 

Script:

Asmodean: Is it really in all objectivity? Or were there always folks who craved a less fair policy (feminist or left wing or not)?

6-eyed shaman: Who’s craving a less fair policy? You and your conspiracy theories

Asmodean: If you want to make a joke please be aware it should at least be either funny or witty.

6-eyed shaman: I asked you a question, not a joke.

My question (in bold). The conspiracy theory statement was a side note. Maybe I'm missing the context of what you're trying to say about craving less fair policies, if you could clarify.

From what I've seen, it seems that the extreme feminists are the ones who have all the power. And all the sensible egalitarian people who still call themselves feminists are docile and not given a voice. At this point, the colloquial interpretation of what it means to be a feminist, has been hijacked by the misandrists of the far left. At this point, trying to restore civility to the word is a lost cause.

Sigh...

Because modern feminism and classical feminism have distanced themselves so far from each other, that it's reached a point of no turning back.

Modern feminists find sexism where it doesn't exist, and they sow the seeds of division by creating their own sexism via articles like this:

https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/ha...luable-lesson-of-my-life-20161220-gtex2e.html

Modern feminists get away with misandry, hate, bossing others around who don't conform to their social Marxism, cry sexism against men when they don't get their way, and are absolutely ruthless to other women who don't think exactly like they do. But once they're confronted with their hypocrisy and double standards, they always say "Feminism is about EQUALITY. Look it up in the dictionary."

Gimme a fucking break.

I've explained this to you and the rest of the Balbus cult plenty of times already.

 

Are you saying that all these women didn't get elected president simply because they weren't men? List of female United States presidential and vice-presidential candidates - Wikipedia

 

If this was a republican, who would be making excuses? It's very weird to see who is making excuses about Biden. And yet, he's the only hope the democrats have in 2020.

Beto? Bwahahahahahahahaha

Warren? Minny-ahahahahahahahahaha

Without Biden, Trump gets a second term. Suck it up and focus.

 

Yes, focus on...uh...Biden...and...yeah...

 

If a gay mayor from South Bend can win the presidency in 2020, we'll know the Apocalypse is near. He does have the advantage of being intelligent and decent, which gives him an edge over Trump. There's hope too that more of the Mueller report and bank accounts might be available by then, and that the economy will collapse, although I wouldn't hold my breath. It's not over till its over, and I'd vote for Godzilla's grandmother over Trump, but I'm not getting my hopes up.

 

In this age of doctored videos, I think sources are important. Are the trolls at 4chan who gave us Pizzagate at it again? Mark my words, if the Bern gets the nomination we'll be treated with some compromising videos and photos of him in a four-way with under age cross dressing German shepherds.

 

Maybe so. But who knows what evil lies in the Mueller report, Trump's bank account, etc., just waiting to be uncovered? The Shadow knows. Mwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. If the voters are dumb enough to give Trump another term, they'll deserve the outcome, which won't be pretty! Why doesn't that prospect bother a "neutral" observer like yourself? Got your bunker stocked?

 

I don't think Trump's chances of a second term are great. I also think Kamala Harris is a good candidate.

 

Evidently you do think sources are important. I'm surprised you didn't source yourself for the last two posts. But this is just hipforums.

 

He may not be saying it, but I'm willing to stick my neck out and say that that wasn't the main reason. I doubt that Gracie Allen of the Surprise Party was a serious candidates (protest votes, no doubt). Roseanne was likewise a stunt, although she had axes to grind and did garner almost 49 thousand votes. The others were third, fourth, fifth, sixth party candidates against which the deck is always heavily stacked in this country. Are you serious or just being a smart aleck?

 

I do ask you to vouch for the sources of what you put out for us, so that we can assess their credibility. This gem seems to be the work of right wing British You Tube conspiracy theorist, promoter of fake news, and former InfoWars editor at large Paul Joseph Watson who learned his trade from Alex Jones. He also contributes to, sometimes hosts, or co-hosts Infowars' talk radio program The Alex Jones Show. Paul Joseph Watson - Wikipedia The very first scene is the one of Stephanie Carlow, which she says was misrepresented. You may believe it. Thousands wouldn't.

 

I tend to agree with you on this.

 

Paul Joseph Watson is less than a prophet, but more than a man.

He is leaving Infowars to start his own venture. I'm excited for him.


As for Creepy Uncle Joe

e t

 

I can see why you're so excited. Just your type! Your hero. Haven't seen you so giddy since Milo. Bettern' Pizzagate!