Harry And Meghan Get Booted Out Of The Royal Family!

Discussion in 'U.K.' started by Boozercruiser, Feb 19, 2021.

  1. Boozercruiser

    Boozercruiser Kenny HipForums Supporter

    ......
    Hi Folks.

    I am so please this has happened to these two selfish rastards, and it should have happened last year.
    I could go on such a rant of how I despise this pair of useless to our country disrespectful money grabbing toe rags, but I will wait to see what you guys have to say about it.
    I hope you say a lot either in support of them(How could you)? or against them.


    Good on you!

    I see they have gone to live in Calorfornia?
    California is welcome to the greedu money making selfish heaps of poo!

    My message to them:
    Go on.
    Sod Off and make all of your mopney.
    But I can tell you this.
    One day you WILL regret it!

    ..

    UK Home | Daily Mail Online
    ...

    Royal fury at Harry and Meghan's 'horribly disrespectful' parting shot:
    Palace shock at couple's churlish insult after losing patronages - as it's revealed how Queen told her grandson 'you work for the monarchy, the monarchy doesn't work for you'


    Although Buckingham Palace officials do not want a slanging match, many are said to feel Harry and Meghan's ‘barbed’ statement was ‘horribly disrespectful’ to the elderly monarch, whose husband Philip is in hospital.
    As relations hit a bitter new low, an insider said: ‘They have made a roaring success of what they set out to do in the US, this independent life.
    And good luck to them. But you can’t have your cake and eat it. ‘If your primary role is to serve the head of state and the monarchy, then it’s very hard to do that if you are earning millions on the side.
    That’s philanthropy, not public service. The couple are working with some deserving charities and causes, which is great.
    ‘It’s just that the model of how they are doing it is different from how the Royal Family do it.’
    The source stressed that the split from the Royal Family had been Harry and Meghan’s decision entirely.
    ‘They have chosen to live in America, they have not been exiled to America,’ they said.
    Another insider said: ‘Let’s be clear, the Sussexes instigated this.
    They jumped. But the Queen is firm: either you are a public servant or you aren’t..



    [​IMG]



    .........
     
  2. WOLF ANGEL

    WOLF ANGEL Senior Member - A Fool on the Hill HipForums Supporter

    History may not always repeat itself, - exactly, - althougth it often comes close
    [​IMG]
     
  3. Boozercruiser

    Boozercruiser Kenny HipForums Supporter


    Yes WOLF.
    Too close for comfort really!

    ......

    Pompous little statement from Sussexes’ Hollywood PR department says it all

    ...

    To us, it looks as if their work over the past year has been securing lucrative deals with Netflix and Spotify.

    That is indeed duty and service but it looks like it is mainly duty and service to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

    If you do good works — which they do — they will always be overshadowed by the money-making deals that race smartly alongside them.

    No one cares about the unseen, unglamorous works they undertake when they live such a high-profile lifestyle.

    Harry and Meghan moved from a huge mansion in Vancouver Island to a house in the Hollywood Hills and then to a multimillion-dollar mansion in Mendocino County — all in the space of a year.
     
  4. Vladimir Illich

    Vladimir Illich Supporters Lifetime Supporter HipForums Supporter

    "From tiny acorns, mighty oaks do grow". With any luck this could be the beginning of the end for the monarchy entirely !!!


    REPUBLICANS RULE OK !!!
     
  5. soulcompromise

    soulcompromise Member HipForums Supporter

    I wish they weren't fighting. :(




    I feel really good when I see news of Harry and Meghan; encouraged and validated. I don't understand why they are cracking down on Harry alone. If they want to reign everyone in, don't then single out Harry! It sets up a bloody catastrophe...




    My only hope for them is that Harry will now appease the Queen and publicly apologize for the miscommunication...
     
  6. WOLF ANGEL

    WOLF ANGEL Senior Member - A Fool on the Hill HipForums Supporter

    I've often wondered why some 'Republicans' are so against the Monarchy, yet so critical of their 'Elected' Governments - it seems there is only No way to please some folk.
     
  7. Vladimir Illich

    Vladimir Illich Supporters Lifetime Supporter HipForums Supporter


    True, until we get a 'SOCIALIST REPUBLIC' !!!
     
  8. WOLF ANGEL

    WOLF ANGEL Senior Member - A Fool on the Hill HipForums Supporter

    Socialism:
    • (Marxism) The intermediate phase of social development between capitalism and full communism in Marxist theory in which the state has control of the means of production.
    • Typically based on principles of community decision making, social equality and the avoidance of economic and social exclusion, with economic policy should giving first preference to community goals over individual ones.
    Republicism
    • A state where sovereignty rests with the people or their representatives, rather than with a monarch or emperor.
    • A state, which may or may not be a monarchy, in which the executive and legislative branches of government are separate.
    • The political principle of the separation of the executive power (the administration) from the legislative; autonomous execution by the state of laws which it has itself decreed.
    • One of the subdivisions constituting Russia

    Hmm, this sounds close to what we do have
    Socialism: The Crown does not have control of means of production
    Community decisions are indeed made more locally than Sovereign degree, and by Private Companies (that seem to continually put profits before people)
    Republicism: Aren't 'representatives' those chosen by the people at local/general elections by individuals with freedom of choice?
    Executive Power of decision making,- Hasn't that that got to do more with Br-exit than British /Irish sovereignty?
     
  9. Vladimir Illich

    Vladimir Illich Supporters Lifetime Supporter HipForums Supporter



    Why don't you go and learn all about the 'executive' powers Mrs Windsor still holds, then come back and tell me we have a democracy ???
     
  10. WOLF ANGEL

    WOLF ANGEL Senior Member - A Fool on the Hill HipForums Supporter

    Do you mean "the 'executive' powers Mrs Windsor still holds" = yet choses not to use? - according to the video you posted
    As for not living in a Democracy, what do you think we live in then?
     
  11. Vladimir Illich

    Vladimir Illich Supporters Lifetime Supporter HipForums Supporter


    As I pointed out previously, no we do not live in a PERFECT democracy, because we have a monarch and unelected people (house of Lords) imposing laws on us. When we abolish both institutions and have ALL elected members of government, then (and only then) can be said we have a democracy.
     

Share This Page


  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice