Dude, you've gotta be fucking kidding me. The whole latter half of this thread is arguing over whether it is anti-semetic. Listen, regardless, I am no racist or anything of that sort, and I still haven't heard any rebuking to the paper or any straight anti-SEMETISM cited because there is none. Stop pretending that's the issue? I thought that was the issue, the differnece between zionsim and semetism. I don't claim to know Hitler or stick up for him, he may have been a pawn is what I'm saying, who funded Hitler, ask yourself that, better yet, go ask Yahoo.
The issue is that this is anti-semitism disguised as anti-zionism and it is so blatantly obvious that hardly anyone could fail to see it. That's why you wouldn't dare show this article to any jews (although who knows, you may "discover" that all the jews you meet are zionists since if they disbelieve your conspiracy they are probably part of it). You may not be racist intentionally but you have been fooled into believing in a racist conspiracy theory. That's the bottom line and its pretty bad. Hitler may have been a pawn of who? The jews (oops I mean zionists)? You still can't find any anti-semitism? I cannot think of a more perfect example of a purely anti-semitic concept that to blame jews for Hitler. You have no idea how far beyond insane this shit is that you are falling for. And go ask Yahoo? If I asked Yahoo is blacks are inferior, I could probably find some websites that say they are. So?
if its so blatantly obvious give me a quote. and once again, certain zionists set up hitler and funded him for his psychotic rule. Nobody is blaming the jewish people. That's you spinning. blacks being inferior is more of an opinion, who gave hitler money is fact. but you still didnt bother to look it up huh. i looked up the black thing.
lmfao!!!!! so wouldn't this mean your a loser too? all day you spend your time "posting" thing's that are easily de-bunked. i would think every one agree's he spends less time de-bunking your posting's than you spend looking them up and posting them,i like how you worded the age thing pretty much saying "i'm only 16 wtf do i know! looks like you have 5x the amount of post he has...........hmmmmm simple math would imply your 5 x's the loser he is then wouldnt it?
I didn't mean the comments I posted before about pointbreak, but that is just a small segment of the things he says, everytime i post anything he always comes back with smart remarks, if he wants to debate my claims he can so in a polite matter, but instead he just comes back with these personal attacks claiming that im "anti-semetic" or "crazy" and sometimes it gets me angry and makes me respond the same way, but atleast i'm man enough to delete my posts and apologize and I'm half his age, i'm sure he isn't mature enough to do that.
I'm surprised this thread got so many replies. I actually made a point of not replying so as to not condone the idiocy, but it seems it wa sin vein...
Am I a worthy opponent? Oh, dammit, I still need to respond to that post. Lemme gather my thoughts...
ooh, the old "divide and conquer" technique. How unoriginal yet still effective. Don't fall for it people.
Like what, Big Macs and Britney Spears' newest thong? No thanks little boy. I'll stick to analysis and real debate. Bye!
um maybe hes serious and just stating his oppinion, it very well can be true what hes saying. u cant prove him wrong.. just like u cant prove god exists or that evolution happened. u gotta be open minded and take evrything into concideration.. dont just discredit this info, though it may seem highly improbable, but realize it could be true.
Very smart words, MP. It's funny looking back on this thread. Pointbreak never did come up with that quote. If our positions were reversed, he'd be hounding my ass getting me to respond and calling me a nutty conspiracy theorist. These guys are real spin doctors. I don't hear any ideas from them, just them shooting down what people say and calling everybody a nutcase, then when asked for evidence or ideas, they change the subject, "I'm not saying anti-zionism is anti-semstism" my ass. peace.
If someone says "I am not anti-semetic, but zionist jews financed hitler", you consider this to be free of anti-semitism? That's your low standards, and not my problem. You know this article is anti-semetic and that's why you will never show it to a jew and ask their opinion. Truly gullible.
Why is that anti-semetic? Are the Jewish people some infallable race? Not to mention I don't identify them as jews. I mean more like, Hitler received funds from Wall Street bankers. I don't know if they were Jewish in decent or whatever, that's beside the point. You're ignoring the real issue and turning it into an issue of race. Who cares what race they are? This shit is not good for anybody. Still waiting for a quoted example.
What you're waiting for is a quote that says "I hate jews" because anything short of that is too subtle for you to grasp. Like I said, your inability to see blatant anti-semitism in that article is not my problem. Take that article to ANY jewish person and ask what they think. You won't, because you know it is anti-semetic but want to continue pretending its not.