I'm setting up a rating system on the MJ Guide for people to rate each grow (in the online Journal system we've setup there). So besides commenting ppl can rate the grow according to various criteria. I was hoping you might help define what criteria would be useful for rating a grow. I'm thinking we can rate the setup, techniques used, attention to grow, knowledge of grower, yield, etc. Might also rate the journal itself as being useful or not, quality of images, description, etc. (probably just one overall rating for the journal). The general idea is to have a rating system that highlights the best growers, the best grows, the best journals according to their utility for those browsing for info. So what am I missing? Thanks in advance for your help with this.
Oh, well, never mind! It's already a done deal. I hope you like it. If you have any suggestions for improving it, let me know.
