you don't do any chemical? thank god pot doesn't have that THC chemical! and you really gotta stay away from the dihydrogen monoxide, a lot of people are hooked to that one.
Here, let me explain for the unwitty infantile and "comics": by chemical, I don't mean chemical agents & elements, I mean manmade stuff like ecstacy, PCP, alcohol, etc. I limit myself to pot, shrooms, peyote, and other things that can be found in nature.
Why? If I synthesized up some THC would you do it? Just because you obtained a chemical naturally doesn't mean its any safer than something synthetic. The method of obtaining a chemical has no effect on the chemical structure of the molecules, when it comes down to it it's just protons, neutrons, and electrons. When it comes to how safe something is it doesn't matter if it was produced in a plant or a lab. LSD is one of the safest chemicals on earth and it synthetic, while natural shit like poison ivy sucks. So, I'm sick of all you hippies saying you don't do "chemicals". And alcohol is not man made, it is produced naturally by fermenting fruit.
The results of research of NMDA receptor antagonists and their contribution to "Olney's Lesions" are extremely debated.
Well, thanks for your bastion of insight and quick assumption it is because of "health" reasons. Your argument is pointless. If you don't like my choice in what I take, fine, but you don't realize WHY as I never even stated why. You make the fast, closed-minded assumption my choice is because of health. But let's put it like this, I don't recreationally smoke marijuana or put myself into such a state of mind to "get fucked up", that is where I consider it abuse of what Nature has given us. Is it a crime I don't smoke crack? I choose not to because I see no spiritual progression with it, but instead nothing but trouble. And when did I say alcohol was a chemical? I said it was manmade.