God's Time

A point of singularity suggests the universe was in a quantum state and as you suggested, processing is incredibly quick at the quantum level. Then the big bang occurs, the universe expands, the higgs field slows particles and eventually matter emerges.

 

Consciousness of that which isn't life, is of life.

I know what you said and it makes no sense.

No, space exists because there's no perfect vacuum where it can't. You needn't follow me. My tendency to synonymize motion and infinity, for example, is completely unscientific. :-D

 

So the picture I get from what you describe is the universe expands through the higgs field? As far as speed increase or decrease are the particles in a star moving faster or slower than the existing ambient momentum after the big bang or is there even such a thing?

 

What is life made of? Without the mineral there is no consciousness. Attraction and repulsion, taste, is not love. I find your tendency to be not only what you claim but also incomprehensible.

 

There are no perfect vacuums but there are partial vacuums and the quality of a partial vacuum refers to how closely it approaches a perfect vacuum. Outer space is a high quality vacuum
with the equivalent of a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter on average.

 

Let me get this straight. The Higgs field is about looking backward in time to capture the original balanced set of particles, particulate spatial-temporality. Forward in time there might as well be two universes created of matter and anti-matter (as in the old explanation of reversibility of negative and positive particles in the atomic or sub-atomic cluster.

 

Antimatter is matter with a different charge.

Matter does not have a universal definition, nor is it a fundamental concept in physics today. Matter is used loosely as a general term for the substance that makes up all observable physical objects. HIggs field doesn't have to do with looking back in time. The higgs field was postulated and confirmed?, by the discovery of the higgs boson by particle accelerator. Higgs feild permeates the universe.

 

Well, whatever, different "charge" makes the substance for "concretely Being the MODEL within the Universe" needed for the thought experiment. The anti-universe cannot be proven but IT IS the opposite opposition, sir. Yes, different but also transcribed for the construction of nuclear particles in the MODEL.

 

So the Higgs' Field is not backwards in time when the the God created time of most Cosmologists, the forward anthropic or biotropic time develops through particles realized strictly in Radio-telescopes.

 

Didn't know that? It's the up to date biology which ignores cosmological Fact. Pixels topic included.

 

Life is made up of itself. Everything is physical. Do you admit we're all our bodies yet?! lol Love is the love of things whether you love it or not, you purblind pundit! :-D

Your words in the post above this one, #110, suggest a mind might arise without biology. I don't mind you telling me otherwise, but they do. lol

 

some physicists believe there was a previous eon before the Big Bang and our current eon. after about a googel years all black hole evaporate leaving mostly photons, and a reverse Higgs mechanism meaning sincer there are no particles with mass then there is essentially no scale to the universe at all, then you can have another "Big Bang". this is a slightly different theory than quantum loop gravity which predicts a big bounce before the Big Bang.

this is called "conformal cyclic cosmology"

http://youtu.be/npmDbbGbSoE

 

Can you imagine (not meaning 'anti-matter' in the sense of 'opposition' distinguished) matter of infinitely light vs. heavy weight, and no more weightless Photons (i.e. weighing 'zero')?

 

Bubbles. :-D


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa4sSFmU7uQ

 

Now this is, I guess, in the anti-material other universe. Meaningfully it is the same.

To God's time it would have to be different. And the big-bang I am waiting for is with could mean a Time without God which is Love's,

 

What is itself?f Life is made up of life is not a working definition a definition being a statement describing exactly the nature scope or meaning of or to mark out the boundaries or limits of.
I didn't say a mind but mind being the communication between. My suggestion is you don't have biology without this communication. This communication between is what make the body possible. The human body is an aggregate of smaller bodies and smaller bodies are an aggregate of quantum connections.

Let me get this straight, I suggest mind might arise without biology and you don't mind me telling you otherwise. You may not mind if I tell you otherwise but I don't tell you otherwise.
What you call love of things is a quality of matter, absorption reflection and polarity and is an extension of substantive interactions.

 

I can imagine that infinitely heavy and infinitely light are the same being infinite.

 

I don't know. Being infinite it has something to do with heat too.

 

As far as gaining clarity on any subject I distinguish between what is the same and what is different or not the same. Heat, light, and mass are all energy in different states.

It is not flesh and blood with which we contend but principalities, (states,) and powers, (energy.)

 

Heat is interesting. It has to do the use of MODELS directly as Statistics in fields of DISTRIBUTION. Give me Skips picture at this moment to explain an attitude for all these subjects AS not-being real in the Universe.