Georgia Guidestones inscriptions

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

 

Population reduction, eugenics, world government... sounds familiar.

What's scariest of all is that many people will read that and probably think they're all good, noble things.

 

Let all nations rule internally sounds like the opposite of a one world government

And actually, due to the location being in bumfuck Georgia where most everyone believes in Christianity and conspiracy theories related to the book of revelations, I don't think a lot of people, at least locally, view it in any sort of good or noble light. If you look it up on Wikipedia, you can plainly see the guidestones have graffiti all over them mostly relating to the guidestones being satanic or relating to the nwo agenda. Its kinda ridiculous, actually.

I think they're neat and I would like to know more about the mysterious person who created them.

 

But, Meli.... read the whole thing (again) for #6.

"Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. "


It does say internally.... but then it mentions external disputes in a world court.

 

I guess I don't get why that would be a bad thing. A world court as opposed to...just going to war to solve disputes?

No one can ever really say why things like that are bad except that its all part of some nwo theory or a sign that the antichrist is coming.

Neither of which are good explanations to me.

 

A few of them aren't too bad.

 

I could tell you what I've been told and what makes sense to me but I really don't feel like getting into all that right now... lol and I wasn't trying to say if it was good or bad or neutral... just responding to your comment about how number 6 seemed like opposite of world gov., that to me it sounded contradictory... like both.

 

9 and 10 sound good. Course it doesn't go into details of what or how this would be expected to happen. But, sure, sound good.

1 and 2 do not.

 

One and two are the only ones to me that could really be interpreted badly.

 

Btw, one just quick explanation of other than just saying "cause it's nwo agenda" why the others ones could be bad is that they are often the ways that number one and two would be achieved.

 

The weirdest thing about this is that it's in bumfuck GA. When I smoked a lot of pot it was a big deal to all the people around me and me myself...now that it's been years since I've toked...I don't really care much about what some monument in GA says. I'd like to hear more about who had them made though.

 

Actually, if you look at history, every war that's been fought has brought the world closer to global government. WWI gave us the League of Nations, out of which came the United Nations, which is the Trojan horse of global governance. No more wars sounds great, but then people fail to realize that all the wars that have been fought in the last 100 years have been designed to bring us closer to global governance. And I personally don't think a global government under a fascist dictatorship would be any better, though most people have been duped into thinking a one world government would be a benevolent, peaceful one. Obviously they are unaware of who would be in control of it.

 

Yea, that shits pretty weird. If there was something like that, say, right out in the open in the town I'm in or something, it would be just freaking bizarre I'll tell you that.

Very weird that that is there. Where is it at...like, a park? Near a building?? Etc?

 

And this...
One government could/would be too much control. It would be much scarier to have everyone under control of one dictator or dictatorship than a bunch of separate nations. Too much control in one place... if that would be the only area it's in... hmm... just pretty scary.

 

I personally don't think it's even possible for one dictator to control so many people, so many places.

 

That's why I said or one dictatorship.

One person I agree.

 

I actually think this is more possible than a group of men conspiring, through multiple generations according to some theories, to rule the world. I just don't believe people are capable of that level of cooperation.

 

It doesn't need to be one dictator. It is an entire system.

 

You claim that the chief purpose of WW2 was to bring about the United Nations and global governance.

If this is true then why didn't any of the high ranking Nazi officials reveal anything ? Surely, someone like Goring or Donitz or Ribbentrop or Speer would have been aware of this plan and if they were not made aware of it, surely they were clever enough to realize what was going on. These were high ranking German military officials who were responsible for planning and designing the Wehrmacht military offensive.

Most of them knew the Nuremberg trials would sentence them to death, why would they reveal nothing?

Here's the list of nazi officials who were executed following the Nuremberg trials.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_executions

 

But if you actually study some of these groups and organizations leading this push, which are well documented and have been around for generations, you see that it is very possible. When you have control over the flow of information by way of the media and educational system, it's actually quite easy to do things without most people ever knowing. People don't think it's possible because they cannot fathom it based on what they know vs. what they don't know because they haven't been told.