Will you stop discecting anybodies sexuality or love? you are boiling something magical into some demented retardation. I am not a homosexual myself, but I know and respect many homosexual people. Lets use the slippery slope arguement, you christian conservatives seem to be keen enough on that. If people discect homosexuality like you have, is it not possible for you to discect and ruin heterosexual love? If all love was some mental disorder, would you stand against that as well? How about this: "Do not unto others as you would not have done onto thyself". -Jesus Howard Christ.
Jesus was a quack, he preached about the fall of the Roman Empire... Levictious speaks out against homosexuality due to the open acceptance in Babylon when the Jews were taken into slavery there; they wanted to completely seperate themselves from these particular pagans.
Amongst the huge and mysterious post on the Persian wars is an interesting notion. The Greek city-state of Sparta produced by social engineering the state that it desired. No matter that, the state was founded on a huge mass of slaves that did all the real work while their masters trained for war. We are going to soon have the same ability by genetic engineering to produce a state filled with citizens that are selected by whoever has the money to buy the engineering. Do not tell me that our laws will prevent it. Look at were the first heart transplant was done and why and then look closely into the history of abortion law and note the effect it had on wealthy people. Within a generation or two, the rich are not only going to be financially superior to the rest of us; they are going to be physically and mentally superior. The combination of genetic engineering and real performance enhancing medication will insure that. Now how are we to deal with that?
The poor and middle class are screw.......Showing the images of Lakonian valley in Peloponisos of where ancient Sparta would have been).
It doesn't matter really, but I can see it. It's even less uncommon than actual homosexuality for animal societies to have adult males and females who do not produce young but still serve a societal function within the group (e.g. fox cubs are often cared for by two or three different females). I don't feel great about the idea of Nature as a substitute for God - which the population control idea may point to - but it makes as much sense as anything else I've heard in this thread.
I'm not saying people aren't capable of having their minds changed. I'm saying you won't do it by bombarding them with stockpiled cut and paste text. The whole point of a forum is to discuss, not to preach. You'd have more luck posting the links where you were getting that stuff from rather than just flooding the place with reams of text which the casual reader (i.e. the majority of people reading it) is just going to skip through.
I'm going to keep posting this every few days. Once again, why the fuck hasn't this thread been closed?
I'd say it's a little misguided to consider people ignorant just because they're only peripherally interested in what you're saying.
Did you know...that if you guys shutup, like you should have about 3 months ago. This thread would have died and taken its proper place on the trash heap of useless forums? Anyway, im being hypocritical, but i learned the truth now and its better late than never.
well is just as bad ass posting stuff on the Doors over and over again like if the Doors was the only important band in the 1960s and 70s you can throw a few more in like Pink Floyd and Led Zep. and Maybe ...The Who..and the G, Dead .
What are are you talking about dude? Didn't maggie sugar warn you that you'll get banned the more useless cryptic shit that you post?