Females - Do you like the feel of a cut or uncut penis inside you?

First, you're not a woman, so stop pretending to be one. You're just another insecure guy who is incapable of accepting the fact that you were violated against your will as a baby and that your quality of life has been worse off because of it, and that there's nothing you can do about it. Clearly, I know... trust me, just accept it. While I'm cut, reason, logic and particularly knowledge about things such as sex, sexuality, anatomy, and more broadly, biology and psychology, as well as intimacy and eroticism, help me immensely to see the reality of my situation, which is that despite the loss of this body part -- that anyone above retard-level understands is a boon in giving pleasure to a woman -- I can do more than deliver, without it.

Your story about having sex with "several" uncut guys who later got cut is highly improbable... so improbable, in fact, that it's just short of being impossible... outright idiotic.

Your claim that there's no loss of sensation after getting cut is simply illogical. It's a pure scientific fact that the foreskin is made largely of erogenous tissue.

 

Aesop's fable of the fox who lost his tail

A FOX, caught in a trap, escaped by tearing off his brushy tail. After that, the other animals mocked him, making him feel so ashamed that his life was a burden to him. He therefore worked out a plan to make all the other foxes the same as him, so that in their common loss he might better conceal his own deprivation.(The Greek word is Mutilation)

He called a meeting of foxes. A good many came to it, and he gave a speech, advising them all to cut off their tails. He said that they would not only look much better without them, but that they would get rid of the weight of the brush, which was a very great inconvenience.
But one of them interrupted his speech.
"If you had not lost your own tail, my friend," that fox said, "you would not be giving us this advice.

 

I agree with that a natural penis is defintely better. I am in my 40's, a woman and have experienced both.

My experience has been that men who are circumcised have a penis head where the skin is more rough from their clothing and such rubbing against them over the years.

With this being said they have a dulled sensation to their penis in comparison to the intact man, making them to have the tendacy to jack hammer while having sex. circumcised men have a need for artifical lube from all of that thrusting and their penis's drying out. Ladies, Ever have "Friction Burn"? most likely it was from a circumcised man..

An Intact man's penis head is silky smooth, the foreskin just feels wonderful whether it is felt by hand or inside my vaginal walls.

It is so true,as a natural man slides in and out of a woman his foreskin glides back and fourth giving her incredible stimulation.

I have found over the years many American women have not fully experienced a natural man. They (I included) were raised in a society that pushes Cut is better. Growing up we were never told all of the positives of an natural penis. How that is the most sensitive part of his penis, how it aids in keeping sex lubricated, how it not only stimulates him but his partner too. Instead, Americans are taught that it is dirty, unattractive, and it is not normal.

God does not make mistakes and foreskin on both male and women are there for a reason. To protect the genitals.

I know people feel it is dirty because it is how they were raised to believe, but let me ask you something: If you are a hard working man who does construction and you sweat alot and wear work boots all day. When you get home and kick of your boots and your feet stink. Are you going to cut them off? No, you wash them. Same thing with foreskin. Either you are cut or uncut, man or woman, if you do not wash yourself regularly you will smell bad.

People seem to feel that being circumcised lessens your chances of getting a STD, do you all not do your research? If that is true, tell me why the HIV/Aids rate is so much higher in the U.S AND Africa where circumcisions are routine over Europe where circumcision is non existant unless you are Jewish or a Muslim.. Seriously..BTW, I am American born, but now live in Europe.

So yes, I know the poll is long over, but for me..I prefer my man to be natural as he is intended to be. Nothing beats an intact man...

 

Right-on Naturalisbest, I agree,

Simon (cut )

 

Once it's inside me I don't think I could feel the difference. Maybe if I had one right after the other, and they were exactly the same except one was cut and the other wasn't, I might be able to tell, but I doubt it.

 

I have been told by a couple of girls they like the feeling of uncut

 

108,000+ viewings. Who would have thought? Looks like there is no clear answer.

 

well i am an uncut guy and all the girls i fucked said it felt good i dont think it really matters as long as she feels you inside her anyone wanna see a pic i can show you

 

yeh, and theres a way to avoid that.... its called SHOWERING AND KEEPING YOUR BODY CLEAN.

i bet an uncut penis will always be cleaner than a cut one, and its because the uncut guy will wash his dick as often as possible, where as most cut guys dont see the need or wont feel like it is necesary to wash it, because since they have no foreskin, there dick is automatically clean every time they run water over it.

 

do you never wash the rest of your body because there's no foreskin covering it?

 

it's my soap and my penis and I'll was it a fast as I want.

 

Uncut feels better!

 

I prefer a man be circumcised.

 

Thread reopened.

 

When it's inside you who cares? But when you have to look at it or suck it, cut.

 

At the time, you don't get a choice.