Favorite Type Of Porn

tried it recently to jerk off to those videos and you orgasm soo hard an intensely for some reason.

 

I’ve been into dry humping videos lately and mutual masturbation I think that’s hot or nice ass POV style can get me going!

 

I love to masturbate and I use soft porn to help and enhance this, I have strong preferences and dislike most of the porn that is so freely available nowadays! Like some of the other posts here, I hate professional porn models. The use of images is implicit fantasy, the women (and men) have to be 'realistic' i.e. they have to be images of the kind of women and sex I would be attracted to in reality and have to be 'genuine' rather than commercially constructed images of people and situations that do not and would not exist outside of the photograph or video. The images I use are of "amateurs", ordinary women who happen to enjoy sex and have allowed themselves to be photographed. Being an 'older' man I also prefer (to the point of virtual exclusion of anything else) 'mature' women over 50 like myself. The following list is of my top ten preferences all within the 'amateur'/homemade mature category -

1. Breasts - I have no particular preference for size but must have pronounced nipples and areola
2. Bottoms - a woman's bottom is incredibly erotic.
3. Women bent over with no panties or with panties pulled down. An exposed pussy of course
4. Stockings and suspenders - retro i know but a fantastic turn on [I also like women in tights too but with no panties]
5. Panties - one of my ultimate favourites. Upskirts, panties flashed, panties from the front or behind, panties pulled down, women bent over inpanties or with them pulled down
6. Vintage pictures - they have an innocence that makes them all the more alluring and bring back memories of the sexual adventures and masturbation of my younger days
7. Exposed pussy
8. Women fingering themselves and, especially, cumming
9. Women providing a hand job
10. Cocks ejaculating

I have posted some details and additional information in separate posts....

 

VINTAGE PORN FROM THE 50'S AND 60'S
I wonder how many men share my my love of old time porn and underwear??
vc=vvccccc
I began masturbating in the early 60's. As a young man [teen and twenties] the only 'soft' porn available was in magazine form. Hard porn was illegal and unattainable. Although soft porn magazines were available at newsagents buying it from a shopkeeper was embarrassing and uncomfortable and there was little available in a small country town.

With no erotica available, I used the pictures of underwear in mail order catalogues or womens magazines. This was a common practice among young men in those days. I did once find a number of nude mags belonging to my uncle which I stole and these were a source of education and masturbatory delight until I had to dispose of them rather than get found out. They were very tame compared to the internet today; black and white pictures of women in their underwear showing stocking tops and knickers, bare breasts and bottoms. No open legs, masturbation or pussy shots just the hint of hair under the panties. In truth there was little difference between the pictures in a catalogue and those in Spick and Span or Parade other than their purpose

In the months after my first successful orgasm I started using pictures when I needed to cum quickly and when I started to feel guilty about touching myself because doing so was not then enough to lead to orgasm and I needed to not actually see my hand at work on my penis.

That was the pattern to my early use of images. Unable [or unwilling] to get pin up/ porn magazines I resorted to looking at pictures of women in underwear from adverts and catalogues.

Inevitably, men of my age are aroused by pictures of stockings and suspenders and 'panty porn'. This is what we first got off with and the erotic charge will always be with you. Recently, I have found old adverts and catalogue photos from the 50's and 60's online and find that they are curiously erotic not too mention the happy memories of early sexual adventures and potent youthful wanking they produce.

Am I alone in this or are there other chaps out there who share this??

PS Anyone remember 'pettipants'??

 

VINTAGE PORN FROM THE 50'S AND 60'S #2
I wonder how many men share my my love of old time porn and underwear??

I started masturbating in the 1960’s. Young men like me were desperate for images both to toss to and to advance our knowledge of the secret delights of girls and sex! ‘Nice’ girls did not put out although, unknown to us guys, they too were interested in sex and masturbated. An enticing sight of stocking tops, sussies or knickers afforded by a fleeting glimpse up a skirt or a friendly gust of wind was the closest you came to the mysteries of sex. We were desperately horny and the ‘top shelf’ magazines of the 50’s and 60’s tapped into this reality and many duplicated the seemingly innocent exposure of a woman's underwear.

Only 'soft' porn was available to us in magazines. Plenty of publications existed showing more explicit sexual material, women and men masturbating, cunts and cocks, fucking and fetishism had always existed but hard porn was illegal and unattainable. In my small town, wank mags were available but the content was, by the standards of the internet, pretty tame. Although acquiring soft porn magazines was easy it involved buying it from a newsagents and this was embarrassing and uncomfortable and there was the likelihood of beinge refused by the shopkeeper so we were forced to use the pictures of underwear in mail order catalogues or womens magazines and a good measure of imagination and fantasy to enhance wanking.

This may sound oddly amusing today given the amount, variety and ease of access of pornography both in print, video and, of course, online. However, the soft porn we had access to in the 1960’s consisted of photographs of young women in rather ‘modest’ poses compared to today.. The content of magazines such as ‘Beautiful Britons’ and Spick and Span (originally two identical paperback sized magazines one called Spick and the other Span which were popular and to be found in nearly every newsagent they later merged) consisted of upskirts showing exposed stocking tops and glimpses of knickers; women raising their skirts to show their stockings and underwear, women bent over exposing their bottoms; women stripping or in their underwear; women topless and nude where no pussy or pubic hair was visible or had been air brushed away. The models in these were either ‘professionals’, glamour or porn models, or amateurs. Professional porn models were blousy and rough and adopted a deliberately overt and plastic poses. The amateurs were not the ‘readers wives’ we see today, ordinary wives and girlfriends posing for and photographed by their men. They were ordinary girls prepared to pose topless or show their knickers to a photographer for a little extra cash. There was an innocent sexiness to their pictures absent from the unreal professionals. As the context for most top shelf mags in British newsagents, most of the pictures were not that different to a underwear advert.

When I did get some porn it was soft and almost entirely consisted of women partially dressed, showing their stocking tops and panties and bare breasts or bottoms. There were no naked pussies, open legs (unless the model wore panties) and no women fingering themselves. Mags that were readily available like Spick & Span tended to feature semi or non-professional models with lots of stocking tops, panties and garter belts, bras, naked boobs and only the hint of pubic hair. There was a charm to photos that were intended to arouse the viewer and clearly meant to accompany his wanking that were almost ‘innocent’ and featured the kind of girl who lived in your street and would not, in reality, let you see her boobs or her knickers! There was an obvious fantasy element to them as you touched yourself and imagined the girl next door was the woman lifting her skirt or holding her naked breasts in the photograph. These 60’s magazines traded on the fiction that ordinary women like ones you knew would be prepared to expose themselves to you and even be prepared to do it in order for your to wank yourself!

I still remember those magazines, the ones most likely to be in your local newsagent with great fondness. Spick and Span, Beautiful Britons, Parade, Man.
They were surprisingly innocent by todays internet standards, the limits of sexual acceptance meant 60’s photos used to masturbate with available to most men concentrated on stockings and suspenders, boobs, bums and panties. 1970’s high street porn became a great deal more adventurous and the shapely crotch was its focus.

These soft porn pin up images were very similar to the underwear adverts I had also used like many other randy young men with out access to real porn. This was the limit of my experience and the wanking stimuli for several years until my early 20’s and pussy shots and women fingering themselves did not become easily available until the 70’s.

Undoubtedly, this heavily influenced my preferences even though far more explicit images and film are now readily available online and my choice of photos and videos today reflect this formative sexual experience. I find the idea of hard porn debasing, exploitative and unpleasant. I retain an almost moral dislike of them and find softer images far more arousing. I cannot stand the ‘professional’ porn photos. They are plastic and unreal and I can only get off on pictures of ‘real’ women [amateurs]. Some early porn I got hold of featured these unreal professional models and I found them unbelievable and hateful. Fantasy has to be credible for me. I loved the girls in Spick and Span, etc. who were ordinary young women who made a little money on the side posing for largely local photographers and always in very ordinary settings. P

Despite the enormous variety and explicit nature of online material my choice is still in essence the women from the Spick N Span era; ‘real’ amateurs, stockings and suspenders, panties, boobs and [of course] a full bush.

In recent years, the availability of ‘vintage’ porn photos online has brought me back to them and I really enjoy getting aroused by a trip down memory lane.

So, do other guys out there find, like me, that they often prefer a modest panty or boob picture from the past to an exposed ****? Do you, like me, find that these can often lead to a more satisfying wank?

 

VINTAGE PORN FROM THE 50'S AND 60'S #3
I wonder how many men share my love of old time porn and underwear??

Another question: Of course when we men masturbate we love pictures of breasts, bottoms and pussy. For much of my life women hhad a full bush beneath their panties and th most they did to it was trim it or shave the edges. But for some years now the fashion has been to remove all or the majority of the hair around the vulva and porn reflects this even the pictures of older ladies.

Now a neat pussy is a delight but I am firmly of the opinion that nothing compares to the erotic power of a dark full bush.

This unsurprising. For many years all porn I saw was exclusively of hairy pussy. For years the only pussy I saw and handled was well endowed.

But do you older guys agree?

 

Talking of pussies:
I have noticed a number of curious contradictions in my porn preferences compared with my preferences and tastes in reality! For one thing, although I am totally straight, I often enjoy looking at pictures of erect cocks or videos of men cumming. Another inexplicable preference is the choice of pussy photos I like to look at as I masturbate.

In real life, I really do not like big labia. My ideal pussy has small neat lips that sit inside the outer labia. I think this is the ultimate in female beauty and indescribably sexy. This is the kind of pussy I love to kiss and suck.

But when it comes to pussy pictures and those of women with their legs spread when I am masturbating, I really love big fleshy cunts. Why is this? It's possible that a full labia photographs better but still its a weird contradiction/

Do any other men share this ?/

 

Finally for tonight:
As mentioned in the previous post, why does a straight man sometimes like to look at pictures of well proportioned erect cocks, guys masturbating and ejaculating?

 

I use to Jerk to bras sections was the closest thing to porn.

 

Mostly foot fetish, but also voyeurism, female masturbation, group/public nudity, and lately a good deal of shemale. Something about being able to fuck and jerk off like a guy but look like a sexy woman is an interesting combo.

 

Yes, shemale. Watching a gorgeous 'man-woman' enjoying herself and cumming makes me cum so hard I lose my breath almost every time. There was a black shemale some time on a porn site that kept jacking without stopping untill she ejaculated 5 times! I just kept watching her and pumping myself until I was sore & drained, and almost cried because I had to stop!

 

Some of my favorites include gay male porn. I don't know why... it is just so primal and strong. I think a lot of women want to be treated that way but know it would hurt and a lot of men want to be able to really "let go".

 

Well spoken, Emily. I'm an ardent bisexual total bottom, and nothing thrills me half as much as lifting myself up in sweet abject surrender to be impaled and probed and plundered into panting, gasping, wailing, weeping oblivion by that 'primal and strong', and yet the only gay male porn that does anything for me is to watch the tender young twinks kissing & fucking each other ... ?!

 

Tom, I could not described it any better -- it's like you were there, watching me! Those catalogs were all we had -- the words ' Sears & Roebuck' still give me an instant hard-on! -- and we used them to the limit!

Thanks for all those memories come flooding back -- I'm going to make another one just like them right now!

 

There were 5 of us brothers & cousins, and we made JOD (jack our dicks) club, and we spent many, many enjoyable Saturdays and summer days in between the corn or cotton rows, in thick brush by the creek, and especially in the hay barn, jacking and watching each other ... what days those were!

 

oh ya i use to have them under my bed and the pages wud be fucken glued.

 

I swiped a pair of my aunts panties once, and kept them for a long, long time, cumming right in the crotch AT LEAST twice a day, until I could barely pull them apart to spread that crotch. I remember that when I was 10 or 11 years old, I wanted to fuck her so bad I would cry every time I shot-off on her panties!

 

When I was 16, she fixed lunch for 4or5 of us who were working in the field for my uncle. After everybody else had gone out, she went over to the couch, sat down on the edge of it, leaned back, spread her legs as far apart as she could get them (she was wearing jeans), and smiled at me! It was the 'open'est invitation I'd ever had (I was still a virgin), and had it not been for that guy just outside, hanging around his tractor, smoking & waiting for me to come to mine, I would have got up and gone to her. I still cry inside that I missed that! She would have spread them many times after that, no other opportunity ever presented.

 

I mainly prefer to masturbate looking at simply naked women. In any situations: nudism, private shots, spy...

Furthermore I like almost every type of body (maybe not too skinny and not too fat); I also like lingerie/bikini pictures, topless and bottomless. Hairy or shaved pussies.

Well, I am a 360-degree women lover.
I also like porn in the more traditional sense of the term, strictly homemade, with real couples, real girls masturbating in front of a camera and real cheating wives (even if these ones are really rare to find, usually you can find the 90% of staged stuff).

 

I'm not older, I'm 33, but even when I was younger the first nude images I saw were in a book about sexuality which I found in my parents bookcase. That book was published in Europe in the early 70's. I grew up with the idea that women used to have a full bush. When I got a relationship with my current girlfriend, she shaved, but I convinced her to stop shaving and trimming so now she has a full bush.