Fairbanks Alaska Fukyshima radiation resolution

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OddApple, Mar 16, 2014.

  1. OddApple

    OddApple Member

    Messages:
    1,039
    Likes Received:
    16
    http://enenews.com/fairbanks-city-c...tutes-grave-risk-alaska-senator-we-need-to-be

    WHEREAS, the March 2011 meltdowns of three nuclear power plants on the northeast coast
    of Japan constitute a danger to Japan, the North Pacific basin, Alaska and the west coast
    of North America; and [...]
    WHEREAS, available information from scientific sources, the government of Japan, and the
    corporate operator of the facility, reveal unprecedented large and ongoing releases of
    extremely dangerous radioisotopes to the atmosphere and the ocean; and
    WHEREAS, there are no safe levels of radiation emitted from manmade isotopes, and
    human and animal ingestion and/or contact with them constitutes grave risk for many
    forms of cancer and multiple dysfunctions in biological systems [...]
    NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Fairbanks, Alaska, urges
    the federal government, State of Alaska, and the United Nations to begin a thorough and
    ongoing monitoring program of Alaska’s coastal water resources, its major fresh water
    streams and lakes, particularly surface waters that supply potable water to citizens. The
    monitoring program should be adequately funded to accomplish scientific analysis at the
    University of Alaska, wherein it will identify and quantify levels of radioisotopes in
    commercial seafood and subsistence foods. Data should be published on a web site
    dedicated to that purpose.
    Section 2. PASSED and APPROVED this 10th day of March 2014.

    We sell food and already stopped getting anything from ca, or, ak, wa...with that much seafood business at stake, I bet we hear a lot of pushing it and how "safe" it is, but with even worse and more comng I think it's pretty much over we'll just watch it play out.
     
  2. Hippie_Indigo

    Hippie_Indigo Guest

    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with that. I have been monitoring the reading the best I can since 2011. The rise in birth defects and sea animals melting and pockets of puss and many other radiation related issues already happening along the coast, we need to monitor this. There has even been reports of 209 radiation level reading detected from the snow storm that lavished through 13 states last winter.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice