Sorry if it seemed that I implied you were either one, I intended to target myself only as being ignorant and apathetic. Two years ago, I labelled my faith by saying I am an apathetic ignoramagnostic. I am apathetic, cuz I have absolutely no desire to spread, or build my religion. I am ignorant in the sense of the definition of ignorant meaning 'uninformed, unaware, unknowing, etc.', not as in stupid, for the reason you mentioned above... I don't know. And then agnostic just cuz I am not a good atheist, since I believe in a spiritual reality. And there you have it. I kinda hope that when I die, I get to find out some of this stuff... but I might just die.... and even if there is life after death, which I believe, I still might not find out.... c'est la vie.
Actually, your claim to be "ignorant" ties right into being agnostic. Some may say that an atheist can merely BELIEVE there is no god, and remain an athiest. Perhaps they are right, I'm not sure to be honest. Regardless, your admission that the senses can't be used to obtain any absolute objective truth ties right into agnosticism in my opinion
the pretense of proof is precisely that, a pretense. some things do happen a lot more often then others. some things a lot less. define empericly adiquite? there is no 'empirical adiquacy' only greater or lessor preponderances of evidence.