Equivalence Principle Discovered in QM

The dragon was an ordinary young women in Malaysia who did something stupid like mix bleach and ammonia or ignored the kids, only to now spend the rest of her life caring for them. She also became the dragon, perhaps the most powerful witch on the planet. Mother Nature will sometimes offer people fame and fortune at crucial turning points in their lives and, if you turn her down, she gives you chores to do and the ability to work magic. The dragon can be compared to a genie with a warped sense of humor, and you really want to be careful what you wish for. I'm sort of mother nature's biographer, while she is the direct connection to the source. We are yin-yang and she supplies what I lack, while I supply what she lacks, and she'll be the first to tell you she's not that bright, but I really like her anyway.

 

What about Goldilocks and Moses ?

 

You could say the collective unconscious has its own ego, which our own subconscious mind reflects, and that resembles a two year old Goldilocks playing with dolls. Her ego is that of an innocent child, while we have our adult egos that are often constructed around the child. Moses is merely Jim from Huckleberry Fin, and all of my characters can be considered ultimately one and the same character. We are all mother nature and all the dragon as well, and everything else is our pretense and our locally reality each enforces. Self-awareness and consciousness are self-assembling and never stop expanding, with the laws of causality reflecting the simplest perspective of mother nature's ego, or a caricature of the reality.

 

The authors of the article in the first post of the thread didn't discover EEP in quantum mechanics but rather found that QM involves nuances not present in classical mecanics that have to be considered in order to determine if EEP applies to the quantum world. Some of the efforts in the past to try to confirm EEP in QM used semi-classical approaches that didn't fully consider the nuances of QM. Particles in the relativistic regime and superposition of masses complicate analysis of EEP in QM.

The following free paper presents some of the issues with forumulating and experimentally testing quantum EEP. It's by the same authors referenced in article in the first post of the thread.

The authors show that quantum EEP in the relativistic regime demands equivalence of internal energy Hamiltonian operators, in contrast to scalar quantities for the classical case..


Quantum formulation of the Einstein Equivalence Principle
Magdalena Zych, Caslav Brukner
(Submitted on 3 Feb 2015)

free pdf:

Quantum formulation of the Einstein Equivalence Principle

 

Its fundamentally flawed and ignores all the physical and mathematical evidence including all of fuzzy logic, Chaos Theory, and how even a high speed elevator works. Classical physics are a little too focused on their pursuit of absolute perfection. Past a certain point, its called mental masturbation. Chaos theory describes all the geometry and dynamics we observe around us, while classical geometry is primitive to say the least and about four times less complex. Give it all the supersymmetric recursions you want, and it still does not describe the world around us except in the most inefficient way possible.

Believe it or not, Einstein's mathematics were well understood around the 1950s, while the world around us requires mathematics that are four times more complex. That's why String theory has proven so BEAUTIFUL it is wildly popular to this day, yet has not produced a single useful result in half a century. Physicists can be so smart they act like drooling idiots who need to get laid more often.

If modern computers depended on Relativistic equations, they would require skyscrapers.