I like men that are tall, rather than the sizeof there member. I believe how you use it matters more than the size. I've been able to get off with a smaller penis, rather than a large ne.:2thumbsup:
As a photographer who has photographed nudes of both men and women. I have noticed, the size of a mans penis really has nothing to do with his height. I have seen tiny ones on tall guys, and big ones on short guys. Ya just never know whats underneath til the clothes come off. At least thats what I have noticed, just my observation.
Easy to add a few extra inches/cm to an uninspiring dick on any of the pics you come across on the web. I am a photographer, and know the moment I see one that it is not all that it seems. But there are also some real ones out there which can give you nightmares! It is a professional job to make it (and a body in general) look real and exciting. An 11inch woody must be quite a sight. Dear me, I'm happy with my own petite handful, LOL!
But wait, aren't you making the classic mistake of judging a penis by its flaccid size? That's pretty bogus. The correlation is pretty weak. I'm assuming your men were not aroused.
There are a number of pokers that are just humungous when they are not erect. I do know how big they are when they do stand to attention (and 'big' is very big!), for a wank for example, but they look much more appealing in their normal state — flaccid, in context with the rest of the body. One guy is only 19, aboriginal and just improbably big (and proud of it). Aboriginal guys don't need to push weights or work out in the gym for impressive bodies: it's in their genes, bless them.
Well kinda, and your right. But to be perfectly honest as a photographer and wanting to get the best photo, the flaccid penis does tend to look better in photos if it is "plumped up" a bit (and no, I don't do the plumping). In other words, gets a little blood flowing through it. I'm not talking about a full on erection, just enough to make it a little more appealing without making it obsence. Needless to say, full erections do happen, but most of the time the men stay more on the flaccid side. But I do believe what I have seen has given me an idea the size correlation of tall men vs shorter men. Just my opinion on what I have noticed.
skinny girls being tighter is another foolish short cut, our brain tries to take, but logically makes no sense. as with every part of the body it all depends on that person.
From my personal experience the exact opposite is true Ex 6 ft 7 tiny 5 inch cick, another 6 ft 4 guy was a little little guy, ex 5 ft 6 was a thick 10 inches, 5fft9 baby daddy a good 8 1/2 in at least and current boyfriend my height at 5 ft 4 is also hung.Never underestimate the "size" of a short dude. You'll likely be selling yourself "short". Pun intended
I am only 5'7, I am not the biggest guy in the world, but I am far from the smallest. I have had a few girls say I am thick. And I like being a thick guy
Ive been with tall athletic types that werent well endowed, but thats the minority in my experience.. Which consists almost exclusively of tall lean build guys.
The one threesome I was lucky to be a part of, the other guy was much taller and much smaller...so No. Final answer.
Yeah, I'm a little guy also, only 5'6". I'm fairly hung at just over 9" long and about 7" around, sometimes more, when I'm really excited. I always get surprised looks when I drop trau. I got teased a lot in school. I figured I was weird...
Height and build have nothing to do with penis size, it's the luck of the genetic draw. Seems 99% of the men here are all in the 95th percentile in any published size study. I don't know where they get those numbers. I, myself, have been blessed, but I will remain modest.
No!! I knew a guy who kept telling me that he had a big one and never had any complaints. He self-professed that he has a 'monster' He sent me pics of it and I told him I have seen and had bigger. It was about 6 inches if that. He only thing big on it was the helmet, the length and firth was not anything to write home about. He later backed down and said it's not that huge after all. He was 6'7. So clearly, it is a myth.
SMALL I'm 6"1" high and 4.75" long on a real good day, and at 79 I don't have many real good days. I also have big feet and hands, so gals, forget that old idea. I have stumpy fingers and toes, so that may be the true measure. My wife was as tall as me and had even stumpier fingers and toes, and she had no penis at all! MEDIUM My experience at nudist communities is that it really seemed there were just three sizes: a surprising number about as small as me, a good many with about average or a little better, and a few pretty impressive, though hardly the percentage as on porn sites. In short, they came in all lengths and regulars at nudist places knew that and paid little attention. Well, young virgin girls would giggle a lot. LARGE One guy at one place was...astonishing. People called him Tripod and took pity on his wife, a few enough to ask her about sex. I'm told she said they just put in the important part, so guys, forget that idea. Gee, I should write for "Adam Ruins Everything."