does that guy leonard whos constantly posting threads in real kinky about child sexuality freak out the younger forumers or do you think hes just interested from a scientific curiusity point of veiew?
Childhood sexuality is a taboo that needs to be better understood. His intrests seem to be academic, and I think that a sexuality forum is an appropriate place to discuss things like that. If he were posting it here, it would be a different story.
the fact that all he talks about is really srange kinky shit, & especialy that most of its about underage sexuality i find very creepy & the way he puts certain parts in buld & different colrs that seems like hes trying to justify thinking of 6 year olds as being sexual (and even sexy) i think iss just sick, sur hes not going to risk being branded a pedophile & sexual predater by comming right out & saying hes attracted to 6 year olds, but the general impression you get from his threads is that hes trying to justify just that ...others may disagree
since it seems several of u have no idea who he is, rather then post all the links to his threads, theres a thread in parenting about him with links to many of his threads but not all..& from his prophile u can find the rest & see what i mean http://www.hipforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=113655
The fact is, 6 year olds are sexual. They exhibit masturbation and arousal, and all his threads seem to be well researched on the works of Alfred Kinsey. Who was called a pehophile and a pervert during his life, and is now recognised as perhaps the most important acedemic in the history of sexology. I think the hostility towards understanding of childhood sexology undermines our whole understanding of sexuality. Labeling anyone who would bring up something taboo as a pedophile seems immature to me. Calling a person with an intrest in childhood sexuality a pedophile is like calling a woman with a degree in sexuality a slut. Having an intrest in sexuality doesn't make you a pervert, it makes you human. And suggesting this intrest in sexuality extends further into childhood then makes someone a pedo is ludicrous.
its all he talks about is childhood sexuality & oh yea he did talk about wanting to piss on girls & also how he finds it sexy when very young girls fart & very was in italics or bold..if i was a rapist, i'm betting i could find some research to support a theory that rape wasnt traumatic to the victims, just cause he discusses it academicaly doesnt mean hes any less creepy, in fact it may make him more creepy since hes trying to justify his fascination
lodui, wow, im impressed and have to agree with 90 percernt of what you just said. soaring eagle, you're probbaly right about his intentions but who's to say hes not allowed to try and justify something?
man has purpose to his actions justifying an action says something about that persons intentions towards that action what do I justify that I do not believe on some level is wrong? what do I justify that I do not believe can possibly happen? I wouldn't justify myself destroying a great piece of art, because it would not happen it issimply not logical, I however do justify my lies, my inhumanity to my fellow man and certain opinions I have (i.e. the grenade thrown at george bush in geneva shoulda gone off) one does not justify impossible things and for something to not be within an unbreachable barrier of such virulence to culture makes it an absurdly dangerous idea