Do you support Hillary Clinton's view that half of America should be 'Deprogrammed'?

It now officially open season on conservatives, so what is your opinion of the following?

1) Should the FBI be visiting homes of Trump supporters for the purpose of investigating 'terrorists'?
2) Should the Catholic church be infiltrated with FBI agents, all writing 'reports' to 'save democracy'?
3) Should FBI agents be dispatched to school board meetings to arrest and or detain 'wrong thinking'?
4) Should the medical profession be used to enforce Hillary's deprograming via drugs, medical procedures, psychological testing and identification, and registration of conservative dissension?
5) hiring and placement of prequalified/reliable Progessive judges who will base decisions upon their personal emotions so as to identify, remove, and criminally punish those they can readily determine as 'bad guys'
6) What method of permanent identification of conservative dissidents do you favor
a. tattooing of identification numbers on forearms
b. requirements to wear identification markings (ie a yellow star)
c. Requirement to carry official government documentation/passes/permits at all times, subject to review
d. Training of school children to observe and report to school officials all conduct of parents, family, etc
e. Provide your own best method of surveillance and corrective actions of 'deplorable MAGA Republicans'

 

Moderator? UH huh... Rrrrrrright!!!

OBTW, all items 1 thru 5 have actually come to pass, and the 'defund the police' leftists mock the Constitution.

 

Wow, projecting much? To varying degrees, what you describe is very similar to what conservatives have been doing to women, trans people, the LGBTQ community at large and anyone who doesn't look or act exactly like you. Have you seen some of the laws they have been passing and the rulings the Supreme Court has been making and overturning? Conservatives have been infringing on peoples rights to such large degrees it has set us back a hundred years already. You might want to start pointing your finger in the other direction.

 

And PS...why are you still bringing up Hilary Clinton? It's not as if she is in any seat of power or even trying to be. Let it go already!

 

Like the Democrats let it go when they impeached a former President?

 

"Impeachment is the process of bringing charges against a government official for wrongdoing." If he is guilty of wrongdoing(which anyone with decent cognitive ability can tell you he is) then he should face the punishment.

 

Some people really are too far down a rabbit hole.

 

One of these people has been breaking multiple womens swimming records, the other is an actual woman.

 

The charges of the second impeachment were brought against the FORMER President, who was not at the time a government official. Or if you'd prefer to say that they can be charges against a former government official, then that makes Hilary Clinton fair game. If she is guilty of wrongdoing(which anyone with decent cognitive ability can tell you she is) then she should face the punishment.

 

Explain how that is relevant to your original argument? That is a whole other debate altogether.

"A president who leaves office and retains the potential to return someday should still be subject as well to the unique processes set forth in the Constitution to sanction his abuse of his office. To haul a former president back before the tribunal of Congress when it has uncovered misconduct makes eminent sense when the only permissible sanctions might be those that the Constitution provides. That misconduct invariably calls for a special remedy, and the Constitution provides that in disabling the president who has committed such misconduct of ever being able again to serve as president or any other federal office and continuing to benefit financially from his time as president. Presidents are not above the law, not when they are in office, and not when they leave office. That kind of accountability comes with the job, a job Donald Trump seems to want so badly that he’s breaking the Constitution to try to keep it."

I think one of the biggest problems is that you and most conservatives seem to think that just because I and others are anti-trump, it does not automatically mean that I am pro-(any democrat). I think the entire system needs a complete overhaul and that the vast majority of people in office right now should all be gone because most of them are guilty of double dealing, taking bribes, and a plethora of other illegal activity, not to mention that most of them collect a pay check and don't even bother to do their jobs, even on the rare occasions that they actually show up at all.

 

This appears to be nothing more than a DNC talking point, certainly unworthy of a reference, as it pertains to the rule of law not at all. Even the quote says 'should be subject to', not IS subject to. Keep in mind that even though an illegal House impeachment was conducted, Trump was acquitted in that bizarre Senate Kangaroo court.

 

THIS was your post, so THIS is why the reply is relevant.... women and women's sports are under attack, and it isn't conservatives doing the attacking.

 

Nice republican talking points. Everything republicans say publicly nowadays about democrats--the left----and I mean EVERYTHING--applies to themselves. And Fox 'news " liars should be run right out of business. !! Although I don't know why they keep picking on poor Mr Trump ---HE ONLY TRIED TO OVERTHROW THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT!!!

 

And anyway--you can't deprogram solid wood.!

 

My post was talking about people's RIGHTS being taken away not whether or not women's SPORTS are being "attacked".

BTW just a fun fact, do you know why there are women's divisions in sports at all? It's because when women started playing sports along side the men they often out competed them and the men couldn't handle it so they separated them by gender. I personally don't think sports should be separated by gender at all and most women that play sports would probably agree which would make being trans a non issue.

 

But you only ever seem to talk about republican talking points...you mean none of what you say is based in actual fact, only what you have heard or read from bias sources?

I hate politics and arguing in circles, I usually avoid it altogether, wish I had continued, so I'm done, have fun. BYE!

 

You should read up on 'should' and 'is' mate. Maybe do a law degree to know the context within which each is used.

 

...