Did anyone predict this election fiasco?

Lode, why are you spending all this time debating a conspiracy nut here when you could be talking about underwear with me? (No offense, Beckner, but you ARE a conspiracy nut.)

 

It's my opinion that the Towers could have very well collapsed on their own, and the pancake theory makes the most sense to me.

Why did the North Tower collapse before the South Tower? It's my opinion that the North Tower (which was hit after the South Tower) went down first because it was hit with a commercial jet closer to the centre of the building - and weakened the structure.

I have seen the footage. It's not a small prick when a jet flies into a building. Neither is it controlled like house fire. (Have you seen house fires?) It takes hours and hours to control and put out a small house fire. I can only imagine what it would be like to put out a massive fire (it was massive, the fires took up at least 10 floors deep and however square feet) with all the wind that day and up in the air.

How many days did it take to put out those fires in California this summer? How easy was it to control and put out those fires when they caught onto people's homes? Days and days.

 

The california fires were fed with dry leaves and trees, not cold metals.

 

That's the best argument raised in this whole thread.

 

Mhm. So how long did it take to put out dry leaves and trees?

 

those people on the planes deserved to die, except for that 1 plane who fought back

 

MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8XToX7aSdg

 

now rat that video has way to many details conclusively proving the towers were imploded.. they will never believe that..

sheeple dont do well with facts ,there so used to what the government spoon feeds them...

BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA....

 

Squibs!

http://www.debunking911.com/overp.htm

 

A well rationed argument from one of the most eloquent posters here.

 

Oooo... I've been "debunked."

Of course I've already read all the BS about it being compressed air or whatever.

 

how quickly everyone forgets the media as well as eyewitness accounts that day..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&NR=1

everyone was sure of secondary explosions and a controlled demolition on 9/11/01 but i guess that doesnt matter,, that 600,000 dollars (wow that was a hellu investigation huh?) the government spent investigating it determined it was the planes.. had to be..

amazing...

 

You've been debunked years ago crackpot. And you don't have even an idea of what you think happened. You've moved from no planes and missles to the planes being crashed to thermite to fusion bombs all in the past years to desperatly prove your 'research' and now you've given up and simply claim it's something 'we don't know'.

 

I'm glad youtube has provided all this thorough research to you experts.

 

WTF? no research is needed when all ya gotta do is simply show archived footage of that day..
so what all those people were just hearing and seeing things? there all crackpots to??

im sorry,i tend to believe eyewitness accounts over what my government tells me..

why am i even bothering with the sheeple?? its pointless...

 

We're just going by what REAL people heard and saw that day. Not by what well-paid men in suits working for the government tell us to believe. Ever heard the expression, "if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, well, it's a duck"? If people heard explosions and saw explosions (before and during the collapse), well then there was more than likely more than just the simple "pancake collapse" we were told brought the buildings down.

How brainwashed are you? Have you ever thought for yourself....EVER??

Nobody cares what the yellow journalism of Hearst publications' "Popular Mechanics" has to say. These people use straw men while ignoring whatever they cannot "debunk." It's all part of a massive PR campaign to convince the public that what the government told us is the truth. They know people are waking up to their lies and are panicking.

 

Thats more than enough proof.

 

No research is needed? That's an alarmingly ignorant statement.

Even that poorly cropped youtube video you posted states that, as the building began crumbled

''Every two minutes you'll here a rumbling that sounds almost like an explosion as pieces of the building gave way.'' 1:20

You're arguing out of a willfully ignorant and paranoid position with much less detail then rat is hillbilly.

Some you tube videos of loud sounds as tons of concrete poured into the streets.

 

oh,,well,beyond the fact your taking that statement completely out of context, i feel the same about most of your statements here but i keep reminding myself you were only 15 that tragic day.they have had ample time to mold your brain into what it is now.. im sure in time youll see the flaws in your thinking. until then i guess we will just have to agree to disagree..

have a nice day..

 

Heres something in youtube format because I know you kids get bored reading.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stVmEmJ666M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d0XEHahJ2Q&feature=related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_Fm3Zc7D8I&feature=related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpckijMVe3I&feature=related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEg6XEP-Cig&feature=related