For decades if not longer the use of something to cover just the nipple or penis head was used to (lost of word here) From belly dancers to strip club performers and in magazines and now online. Its very strange to me being a life long nudist to cover such a small part and think that changes or obscures something. Does it make a difference to you or is it a joke to you? I saw this on a advertisement for a sex toy and just busted out laughing. Funny thing is if a hand or arm is used to block the view it seems actually good in a teasing way.
I find it ridiculous how it's legal to show every single bit of a person's sexual parts except the sensitive, actual used part such as the cockhead, nipple or clit or vagina. I saw girls at the beach wearing thong bikinis where there was merely a triangle covering their pussy and two small triangles covering their nipples. Their entire ass cheeks were exposed as the material ran up the crack and was invisible. That's acceptable.
I still believe in my long time solution to the problem of weird dress, skimpy dress, and the high prices of clothing and just make a national law that makes clothing optional in most public venues, including schools starting at grade level 8 and into the senior year. That way it's the same for everyone, and if a non conformist has a problem with naked people they can wear special glasses that shade out the nude people who offend them.
The lake we boat at, you will see many women with pasties and a g-string. My wife has done the pasties thing as well. It is a way to get as close to naked as possible without getting arrested. It is rather silly as she is pretty much naked.
It's an assured thing to do. First of all, we ALL have nipples. You aren't hiding anything with those panties. Second, to JUST cover the tip of the penis??? What message is THAT sending. An erect penis is fine, just not the glans? The scrotum is nothing yo hide?
With your foreskin.........and if you don't have a foreskin, then use one of many specialty covers sold in several online stores.
This sounds like fetish stuff, more like calling attention to the parts that are covered than genuinely wearing clothes.
I agree, covering with the hand or arm makes it seem more like a tease or that the person is shy in a very teasing way. As far as covering nipples on female breasts, I don't know what it is, but I'm not really turned on, or get excited by seeing just a breast. There's something about seeing the nipple that really makes it arousing, at least for me. Maybe it the fact that I prefer small breasts or maybe that's why I prefer small breasts??? I guess covering the head of the penis is tantamount with covering just the nipple on breasts. They probably think that if you don't see the head then you won't get aroused???? Although, if they're only covering the head aren't the shaft and balls still visible???