Conclusive Report on 9/11 Incident From the U.K.

Man, you people are really obsessed with balls, aren't you?

I've heard that shape-shifting reptiles are related to trolls. Perhaps you've run into one or two at family reunions . .

 

Here's a humorous video to lighten things up some:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kG4yGICFsi8&feature=related"]How To Destroy a 9/11 Truther - YouTube

 

Here's some more comic relief involving another "official-liner" getting exposed for his bullshit:

Here is part one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEtfHkE2zYg"]Popular Memetics - Part 1 of 2 - YouTube

Here is part two: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBYOPJk2u64&feature=related"]Popular Memetics - Part 2 of 2 - YouTube

 

Wow! That interviewer is a real pitbull, ain't he? A shape-shifting, question-throwing pitbull.

 

OP video is laughable! It's just absurd to think with all the witnesses that planes DIDN'T strike the towers! The "ball" was a jet. the wings did not appear in that video angle due to a combination of low video resolution, mirage mirroring (like on highway asphalt), and digital video compression. Don't buy into this crap!

 

That's right. Question everything. Then choose your battles. That's what I do. That's why I can post what I do with confidence that it will not come apart at the seams when scrutinized by others.

For instance, my assertion that the temperature inside the WTC was nowhere near high enough to melt or weaken the steel of the core structure to the extent that it would crumble at near free-fall speed as it did is enough of a no-brainer that it's a wonder anybody buys into that crap!

 

I've always believed it was orchestrated by the US government to start a war with Islam and those Islamic countries that are disliked by some in positions of power in America like Iran, Syria, Iraq and Libya.

 

This argument's been done:

http://www.hipforums.com/newforums/showthread.php?t=431936

 

You must have put up the wrong link; there was no argument there . . .

 

To be specific, Mustlivelife offered an argument for the premise that something was pretty fishy. He tried to explain the concept of conservation of energy and the conservation of momentum, but you offered nothing in return but a denial of simple physics; that's not an argument. It's denial.

And besides, that was a thread having to do with Charlie Sheen.

If you care to argue your points here, why don't you start by addressing post #16 of this thread. And you can start by explaining how the jet fuel, which burned off after five minutes, and the contents of offices which burned out after twenty minutes (see NIST Report), created an inferno that somehow created such a weakness in the core structure that the whole thing just crumbled in on itself without any resistance to speak of . . . three times in one day!

 

I'd like to hear some more bout dem big flying blue conspiracy balls , if you please sir .

 

I remember when this happened, I was at school and a girl was taken from the classroom because her father had been on one of the planes that crashed. So.. You're an idiot if you think there were no planes or planes without people. That has to be one of the stupidest things I've ever read, so stupid that on 420 it doesn't even have appeal.

 

Papawolf,

I understand your unwillingness to address this like an adult. Why aren't you addressing the points I'm asking about. If you're not up to it, and you'd like to continue with the baby-talk, that's your prerogative. But you should know it makes you look like a troll; moreover, a baby troll.

Irminsol,

Are you in the habit of imagining things? I have to ask you that because I have said nothing about no planes being involved.

420, huh? Well, I guess that explains that.

 

I've no where indicated that my post was directed at you.

 

You're right. My bad. I mistakenly thought that since your post followed a baby troll's post, you were trolling, too. Apologies . . .

 

That "Quote" button is there for a reason

 

Oh Really what is that?

 

Well, yeah, Irminsul, who was your post directed at?

 

So others can follow whom you're speaking toward or it could appear you're having a conversation with yourself which would make you schizophrenic :2thumbsup:

 

Now that's my kind of humor. LOL!

Honest to god, I figured that since she was following a baby troll, she must have been it's mother. I hadn't considered schizophrenia. My bad again.