Climate Change

Discussion in 'Politics' started by David Vanzant, Jan 12, 2023.

  1. newo

    newo Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    12,284
    Likes Received:
    12,705
    ARE YOU STILL AROUND?!

    [​IMG]
     
  2. ChinaCatSunflower002

    ChinaCatSunflower002 Members

    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    57
    Let’s review exactly what I have put forth in my previous post.

    I have shown that it is possible to radically influence Dice with psychic intention, and began to get results from RNG that honestly somewhat disturbed me due how directly it showed me results.

    The RNG is truly random and based off of radioactive decay, which is a Quantum event. I do not own a pseudorandom RNG. That would defeat the point of the experiment. The point is to be interacting with the Quantum regime.

    It only makes sense that if you are able to influence an RNG based off of radioactive decay, that you should attempt to influence a Cold Fusion experiment which requires Quantum Tunneling in order to succeed.

    The criticisms against Cold Fusion are that it is not replicable, while the believers say it can be done, but that it happens not very often.

    The issue is a Probability issue.

    What’s needed is to increase the Probability of Quantum Tunneling in order for Cold Fusion to convert the doubters.

    Lack of and the discontinuation of funding from the Government ended up killing Cold Fusion in the late ‘80s, early ‘90s, and so it only makes sense to turn to the private sector to continue research.

    That is why I am now establishing Volity Labs. If no one else wants to get to work on this, then I would like to. I just need funding in order to get started.

    Climate Change has clearly alarmed many people worldwide, and if the projections are accurate, it’s only going to get worse.

    Desperate times call for extreme measures.

    That’s why that if you are truly a Scientist, or believe in Science, then you should be very interested in the results that I have reported. You should want to know how and why that’s possible. And you should want to help fund the solution to Climate Change.

    Your donation will pay itself back many times over when the world’s energy problem is solved indefinitely via Cold Fusion.

    The idea of Volity Labs would be to combine a traditional Fleischmann-Pons style of experiment with a traditional Radin style of experiment over at IONS.

    It only makes sense to combine these two branches together. I’m quite certain the results are achievable.

    Below is my Monero address if you have any interest in donating to Volity Labs. Monero will keep your donation completely anonymous if you feel too embarrassed to help fund such an “outlandish” idea. Just buy Bitcoin and swap to Monero thru various means. I use Cake Wallet. Thank you for your time.

    425RKDXQYwF9eYK6YaBJXfJ6ZmAhLjFfgfob1338DUmGHNoRtYwfEKSERz6ZiMWpqJ5VMucSKdoybcnNb7TzkiEH1gLx7Nj
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2023
  3. kinulpture

    kinulpture Member

    Messages:
    1,494
    Likes Received:
    207
    Interesting in a certain sense until the cash donation part.
    I say this because psi can play a role in certain experimentations. & in actuality this is how some of our ancestors did certain things. For instance, the vision quest. In some cases, psi was enhanced with chemicals. This was done originally, because humans mostly lack ed in psi as compared to the outside influences. Ya see, the outside wanted us to do certain things for ourselves. Because thats universal law. Unfornately the use of these chemicals occasionally got outa hand. Needless to say still does. This is partly why some humans reverted into primitivity. Less karma that way. Still others continued abuses. One of the reasons technology was re introduced was to give certain advantages where advantages were lost. But that also was abused in that this time was developed lopsidedly.
    It may be possible to mess things up worse if intents turn wrong. But some of this makes sense. & again its only reverse engineering of the outside influencers original templates.
    Even easier than dice rolling is cloud busting. Buteven that abused can be bad.
     
  4. ChinaCatSunflower002

    ChinaCatSunflower002 Members

    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    57
    Believers in Science will pay me. I gotta get funding somehow.
     
  5. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,857
    Likes Received:
    15,035
    For your experiments to be considered science you need to publish the results and methods you have claimed in post #799 in a reputable peer-reviewed academic journal.
    Then someone, at least one person, has to repeat those experiments in a controlled environment and get the same results.

    Otherwise you're just giving us anecdotal evidence, which is worthless unless it can be verified by others.
    Anyone that would supply funds to anyone based on anecdotal evidence is just throwing their money away, in my opinion.

     
  6. kinulpture

    kinulpture Member

    Messages:
    1,494
    Likes Received:
    207
    I know of a few places you could get this looked @. But if the military gets ahold of the concept were it good...will become just another suppressed one. Chances are this is already known of & used in negative ways.
     
    ChinaCatSunflower002 likes this.
  7. ~Zen~

    ~Zen~ California Tripper Administrator

    Messages:
    14,109
    Likes Received:
    19,341
    To get back on track...

    "After several years of work by more than 500 authors from every state, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam, the White House released the massive Fifth National Climate Assessment." - USA Today

    "The assessment includes more evidence than ever before to demonstrate the cause and effects of the changing climate", according to one of the authros, L. Ruby Leung.

    The report also says "that humans are responsible for changes to Earth's climate."

    Climate change: How US cities are already feeling the effects
     
    MeAgain, scratcho and granite45 like this.
  8. ChinaCatSunflower002

    ChinaCatSunflower002 Members

    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    57
    J.B. Rhine and Dean Radin, among others, have already done that. It’s not like I’m the first one to ever make these claims. I just have stats that for a single person are notable. It’s like the idea that there are many basketball players, and then there’s Michael Jordan. I’m not sure that I’m the MJ of Psi Dice tests but I think my stats would put me in a reputable position if it were compared to others. I do know also that in the year 1967 I would have ranked 3rd place in the entire world for amount of dice rolls recorded by a single individual. I was reading a Statistics book at the library a few months back. I don’t know where that would rank today but I would guess still in the top 10 or top 20. But that’s just a bonus comment, and doesn’t have to do with Psi.

    Dropbox - Radin1991DiceMA.pdf - Simplify your life

    The Roots of Consciousness: Science, Psychokinesis
     
  9. scratcho

    scratcho Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    34,751
    Likes Received:
    16,573
    In 1960, I rolled the dice in a casino in Las Vegas and they came up 12 , 3 times.in a row. I lost 3 bucks and some guy cleaned up betting 12. The odds each time were the same--35 to 1, but I'd hate to bet on having 12 come up 3 times in a row.
     
  10. ChinaCatSunflower002

    ChinaCatSunflower002 Members

    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    57
    If the odds are the same each time then you shouldn’t be concerned about your chosen number coming up 3 times in a row. Remove the psychological barrier.
     
  11. scratcho

    scratcho Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    34,751
    Likes Received:
    16,573
    Roll some dice and see how many times the same number comes up 3 times in a row, particularly a 35 to 1 number. I'll give you a few years to get it done.:cool:
     
    ~Zen~ likes this.
  12. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,857
    Likes Received:
    15,035
    Dean I. Radin
    J.B. Rhine

    It seems no experiments by either man have been replicated.

    The only way to validate your findings is to test them, and to test them you must publish your methodology, data, and results.
    And then they must be repeated.
    Doesn't matter how many others have published, your results are valid only after meeting the rigors of science.

    Results of experiments in Telekinesis, Parapsychology, et al so far have not been repeatable, a hallmark of science.
    That's not to say that there isn't something there. There might be. We may be able to influence matter in sporadic way... however as yet that can't be proven and as such is not science.
     
  13. ChinaCatSunflower002

    ChinaCatSunflower002 Members

    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    57
    You clearly didn’t even look at the links I posted. Radin does a meta-analysis of Psi Dice studies over the course of like 50+ years. It HAS been repeated lol.

    I won’t bother commenting on the other link. It’s up to you to suspend disbelief and take an honest non-biased look at the data.

    That’s Science.

    “Abstract-This article presents a meta-analysis of experiments testing the
    hypothesis that consciousness (in particular, mental intention) can cause
    tossed dice to land with specified targets face up. Seventy-three English
    language reports, published from 1935 to 1987, were retrieved. This litera-
    ture describes 148 studies reported by a total of 52 investigators, involving
    more than 2 million dice throws contributed by 2,569 subjects. The full
    database indicates the presence of a physical bias that artifactually inflated
    hit rates when higher dice faces (e.g., the "6" face) were used as targets.
    Analysis of a subset of 59 homogeneous studies employing experimental
    protocols that controlled for these biases suggests that the experimental
    effect size is independently replicable, significantly positive, and not explain-
    ~ able as an artifact of selective reporting or differences in methodological
    quality. The estimated effect size for the full database lies more than 19
    standard deviations from chance while the effect size for the subset of bal-
    l anced, homogeneous studies lies 2.6 standard deviations from chance. We
    conclude that this database provides weak cumulative evidence for a genu-
    ine relationship between mental intention and the fall of dice.”
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2023
  14. ChinaCatSunflower002

    ChinaCatSunflower002 Members

    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    57
    I’ve done 25,000 rolls of dice over the course of two years. I said this already. You’re talking to the wrong guy, dude. :cool::rolleyes:

    Where’s Mr.Writer anyway? He’s largely responsible for pushing me into the direction I went down due to his arrogant cynicism of Esoteric Knowledge and consistently mocking me while everyone else licked his balls on this forum. I believe our last conversation was late 2016 in a PM and he encouraged me to go forth with my Dice experiments because he said I would “learn a thing or two about Statistics.” Oh, I certainly did, Writer. I also recall him saying something along the lines of he will give me his girlfriend if I ever got any concrete results. Dig into my original ChinaCatSunflower02 profile history and threads such as “Esoteric (Hidden) Knowledge” or something along those lines to get the gist of it. Me and Writer were very much polar opposites.

    Where the fuck are you, Writer? I got some things to report to you…:D:imp:
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2023
  15. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,857
    Likes Received:
    15,035
    Yes, I did read both of your posts.

    I don't have time to comment right now.
    Be back later.
     
  16. ChinaCatSunflower002

    ChinaCatSunflower002 Members

    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    57
    Well 52 investigators and over 2,000 participants who published their results in 148 different studies over the course of 50+ years means it has been replicated and is Science. Not really sure what else to say about it.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2023
  17. Spectacles

    Spectacles My life is a tapestry Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    4,233
    Likes Received:
    2,015
  18. ChinaCatSunflower002

    ChinaCatSunflower002 Members

    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    57
    See my previous post and donate to my Monero wallet if you want to help fund a real and permanent solution. *shrug*
     
  19. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,727
    Likes Received:
    6,199
    I think Writer is long gone. Haven't heard from him in years.
     
    scratcho likes this.
  20. 2mass

    2mass Members

    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    71
    U
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2023

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice