Like I said, Bob Costas on the February 9th "Real Time" with Bill Maher pointed out something interesting. People who claim to support certain right sometimes have ulterior motives. And they are trying really to damage the cause. Women assigned male at birth probably shouldn't be allowed to compete in sports. Their bodies are still different, though they may be female now. But by claiming people who want gender identity inclusion are going to far, that logic can be extended. What if someone wants get married as a female? What about discrimination laws that protect transgenders? See what I mean? And a little boy who is three years old probably is too young to decide if he was born a female. But what about a 15-year-old? Or 16 or 17? Making a blanket statement that people under the age of 18 can't change their gender would affect them too.
