Circumsized or uncircumsized?

USA in decline - you're being a troll by posting the way that you are. Nobody is going to take you seriously. And creating 5 posts in a row is highly frowned upon in these forums.

Don't say that I didn't warn you.

 

..

 

no wonder this guy was banned...what an ass!

 

Personally I wouldn't want my genitals mutilated. But that's my view.
USA in decline = Fuckmonger

 

yay for my mutilated genitils...i love them soo much =)

 

USA in decline is upset becuase he has a smelly UGLY penis..


Diversity is something good in the world, trying to impose your view on others is an authoritarian, selfish and haughty attitude.

 

both retards

 

I've done my research on this subject, and theres no way that u can tell me that its not worth doing it!!

 

another 1 above

 

Would you really want your genitals mutilated? When you were a baby, against your will, when you had no choice or control over the situation?

Gah, how stupid do you ahve to be to want to take a blade to a newborns genitals? I mean, I don't care if my partner has been circumsized or not because it's not something I can control, but I would -NEVER- chose to do it to a child.

 

Let me just take this off a bit into another question that has to be asked...

I dont care if a guy has his penis head cut open so its exposed, I mean I dont really need to see your sex gland sticking out but I dont care.
However,
What really troubles me is how many American (Im putting aside Middle Easterners for a minute)
How many american (and canadian) woman are turned on by seeing a penis with the skin cut down so the sex glans is exposed.
and,
How many do NOT find a whole penis attractive?

Do you understand what Im getting at here?
Example: I have seen a woman with a mastectomy where her nipple was removed.
Ok,
Dont get me wrong Im not 'disliking' her or anything but I would have to be concerned about myself if I found I 'wanted' and was 'turned on' by womens amputated nipples.
Likewise,
Id be even more concerned if I saw womens 'uncircumcised' nipples and did NOT find them attractive.

Now the one thing I can think of based on what some women had told me was that they would 'by nature' be turned on by seeing the mans penis head and that IS when most women see a penis.
When its aroused and the head is exposed.
Ok,
That does make sense but why would they enjoy seeing it exposed even when the man is retracted to normal size?
One lady told me this: It looks cute that way.
Like a wittle one.
That is NOT cool.
To me, I find that is a real insult to all men, especially those who had the amputation done because, at the time, that suited some bizarre female fetish.

Do you understand Im saying this FOR those of us men who had this done to us?
Even sicker yet (to my mind) is women going around simply telling men and women that some men have 'dirty genitals' because they did NOT have the amputation.
Huh?
Once a girl tried to tell me she 'knew' that men had naturally 'dirty' penises (and thus need to have surgery).
I told her I was going to spread a rumour she had an unclean vagina.
She was OUTRAGED and very very upset I would even joke about it.
I said to her.. well arent you doing that to men?
She didnt like hearing that but its was a truth.

 

Everything you just wrote was a blur that came all at once. It was a thought that you just transformed into words and language. You were so infuriated by the thought of circumcision that you had to vent and in doing so it came out too quick.

 

I must have done something wrong because you seemed to have missed everything.
Try reading it again, it does explain itself and then ask an interesting question.

Then try and contribute something.
Thx

note: Its not 'infuriating' other than to you maybe?

 

Not all people shower daily, and their is definately an odour even with men who even wash daily.

 

So? Pussies have an odour too, they're supposed to. Pheremones and all. Because our bodies produce the scentes they're -supposed to- is not a good reasy to hack at someones genitals.

 

neither do womans who are far more famous for odors but we dont rush little girls to the butchering shop do we?

 

Oh come on, I was thinking outside the box for once.

 

It's my opinion that, unless medically necessary, all body modifications should be the choice of the individual.

However, an interesting fact is consistently overlooked in these debates: It is often brought up that males that are circumcised are assumed to have reduced sensation due to daily exposure of the glans. The fact overlooked is that it females in some western countries, such as the US, are starting to have their hood altered or removed because having their clitoral glans exposed in the same manner as a circumcised penis is being found to increase sexual sensation and increase orgasmic ability. This directly counters the theory of inherent loss of sensation.

 

I STRONGLY SUGEST YOU GO BACK TO MEDICAL SKOOL. AND RESTRAINING FROM CALLING YOU SOMETHING ALSE . BUT I AGREE WITH YOUR FIRST PART.

 

Im not a Doctor but...
Yeah, I dont even know what you were smoking there rumpus heh.
No, its not a 'debate' over whether or not a man loses feeling here lol.. its about as hard logical facts of life as you can possibly get.
Remove 25-50% of the nerves (feelers) and surprise - you lose that much feeling.
I learned that in biology class btw.
(nerves, unfortunately dont grow back)