i was talking about non-surgical foreskin restoration. the process takes a long time. what im planning could be considered vanity by some. but i don't feel that way. i want what was taken from me (my foreskin). its my body so its my choice. the nerves and structures can't yet be regrown. bit the gliding action will be mostly restored ,and the glans due to being constantly protected. will return to a more sensitive state bottom line its my body its my choice. i'm taking back my body
I don't think you understand. Circumcision can, for many men, cause lots of pain or other problems/discomforts later in life, and maybe they'd just prefer have a dick that works properly. I don't see it as vanity. BUT it doesn't cost anything to restore.... Maybe a few bucks for various materials.... But mostly time.
Men get circumsized. What about women? Do they get circumsized? If so, how and what does it do? Also, how do women feel about sex with circumsized and uncircumsized men?
I do not think it inordinately proud to want a lost body part back, for real or a substitute that looks real.
No, it is not. Uncircumsized is the natural way, most men are uncircumsized, most of them are not gross, and if they are it has nothing to do with circumsision. Non of them are tacky for being uncircumsized As a pp said, if you believe that it is so gross and tacky, are you circumsized?
There's several different types of female circumcision, ranging from rather mild and less invasive and damaging than most male circumcision, to very brutal and damaging. Feminists like to think that female circumcision is some sort of barbaric atrocity (which it is, just like male circumcision) but that male circumcision is good, just because they say so, and we all know men don't actually feel pleasure with their penis anyway.... (In my opinion it's a sexual vendetta, and a very dishonorable and hypocritical one)
Hmmm. You have blood dribbling from your vagina 20% of your life and you're worried about someone else's hygiene? It's called washing. The part we call the foreskin is just a label for the easiest-to-amputate part of the continuous penile skin system. The zone with the highest concentration of pleasure-receptive nerve endings is in the range always lost to circumcision. For you to say you prefer a partner missing this valuable tissue would be quite monstrous.
i'm uncut and i love it. i just like it that nobody cut anything off me without my permission. and if i wanted to get it cut i would do it. all the possibilities to get it done are there. but i won't. and i think that every guy should have the right to decide whether to get a circumcision or not on their own. it's their body, not their parents'.
I'm cut but I've always wondered what it would be like to be uncut. It would have been good if I was uncut so I made my own decision but I guess there's nothing that I can do :/
Uncut ftw. I have zero issues with my foreskin. I dont even think about it and no girls have ever said a work to me about it. When you are hard it pulls back to expose your head anyway and its appears there is no foreskin that way. Mine is only noticeable when its limp and when its limp nobody is seeing it but me so who cares?
I think its awesome that there are so many guys out there that are uncut and proud of it. That is the way you came into the world, the way your body was intended to be. Society has decided that it is normal and acceptable to mutilate the penises of our newborn boys and I for one find it infuriating.
well i should hope so! really my point is that many young guys have a complex about being uncut which creates a feeling of shame and most often it is caused buy girls making those kind of comments that it's ugly or dirty so ignorant
Yeah, I used to feel weird about it when I was younger. Teenage girls aren't too subtle when they're surprised by something lmao