Circumsized or uncircumsized?

lol.... and I'm verrrrrry appreciative, too!

 

IM not, i have the whore skin of my penis and i like that. But either way we have to ask the woman about this. I have not been circumcised so i dont know if i would like it.

 

I quite happy that my husband's parents did not decide to have him mutilated as an infant and, naturally, we in turn chose not to have our son mutilated either. For the same reason, we never considered having our daughter's genitals mutilated either.

 

My ex and gf definately prefer me circumcized. They find foreskins yucchy. Plus they like the way I can last for them.

Mutilation for the Nation!

 

I am uncut but you would not know it to look at it. Just read a survey that male circumcisions in the U.S. have dropped below 33% for the first time since the 50's. Frankly I don't see the value in circumcision except where medically necessary.

 

uncut is better for the ladies. (experienced)

 

Please explain why you say this. What makes it better? Are you saying that a female can feel the difference when inserted? Don't understand.

 

well so i think a basic component of life is birth. The only reason we circumsize today is because of how common it is. A lot of the reason why people started cutting is for religious reasons and that is was cleaner. well of course it was cleaner when you didnt bath yourself regulary.

having foreskin today is just as clean as being bare. This is the way a baby boy comes out. Would you consider mutilating your baby girl? Its the same thing. So since the baby is born with it, dont you think its supposed to be that way....maybe for a big reason....like one of the main purposes of life, Being Having sex which leads to more birth?

Have you ever been having sex with a girl for so long but friction caused it to end? I girl can only take so much rubbing and back and forth. When the male has a forskin, it seperates the vaginal walls with extra skin which doesnt move as much as the penis itself....causing less friction. Inturn insuring longer more enjoyable sex. For the female.

 

has anyone done a poll on this....i would like to see the percentage on this.

 

I'm interested in what young women feel about un-knifed penis. The real debate for a father is anti-mutalation (which I am defininetly leaning towards) against the idea that girls will shreik in terror running from the room at first glance of his hooded member.
It's hard enough being a puberty stricken young male learning the in's and out's of mating rituals and how to successfully navagate the early stages of awkward sex, but to throw in the thought that females think your penis looks like a baby ant-eater?
We live in a society that is transfixed on the exterior. I wonder what the percentages are when it comes to the cut and the un-cut? Are women used to both? Hell, I've known women that had never seen an uncircumcised penis. Is that different these days?

 

Simple, women who live in the US or other areas that have a majority circumcised dick will generally prefer circumcised dick, as that's the norm they're accustomed to, and vice versa for non circumcised areas.

 

I am cut. My son WILL be cut. I already had a son for 3.5 years. He was cut. A newborn Baby will not remember it. If you don't get him circumcised, he will endure some ridicule. Hell, even when I was little, I remember being like," what's wrong with your junk".

And if YOU don't like it, go whine about it some more. What other people do and what they do to their kids is none of your business. It doesn't affect you an any way.

 

Maybe you were too weak or slow to stand up for yourself, but today's INTACT infant is in the majority. The CDC just announced only a third of babies are being cut in the US http://www.acep.org/MobileArticle.aspx?parentfeedid=4&feed_id=imn080420101635228885&parentid=742, and rates elsewhere (except Israel and Muslim nations) are lower still.

You could just as easily say it's none of my business if you amputate your daughter's clitoral hood or your son's earlobe. But it IS my business, because I believe there will never be peace unless all people's basic human rights are respected.

All people have the basic human right to keep their whole, perfectly evolved, healthy, normal body parts. NOT ONE national medical association on earth (not even Israel's) endorses routine circumcision.

Of the medical society statements that have been released recently, they are quite clear. Norway's chief ethicist says circumcision must end: http://theforeigner.no/pages/news/top-norwegian-doctor-wants-circumcision-phased-out/. Holland's medical societies unanimously renounce genital mutilation: http://knmg.artsennet.nl/Diensten/k...rapeutic-circumcision-of-male-minors-2010.htm

It's HIS body, and morally the choice about amputating part of it for cosmetic reasons is HIS alone.

 

It's odd and probably untrue since Turks are also cut and they came up as quickest on the draw in some recent research.

The revered Hebrew sage Moses Maimonides said in the 12th century that once a woman has sex with an intact man, you'll never get her in bed with a circumcised man again. http://www.cirp.org/library/cultural/maimonides/

 

If I was uncut, and decided I want to be cut later in life, I would wish it was done when I was an infant.

and circumcision to an infant is no different than giving them a tattoo, peircing their ears, or whatever. of course they don't have a choice, they are INFANTS!!! that's why they have parents, to make these decisions for the kids. I'd say that anyone who wants to be circumcised, but isnt, wishes it was done to them when they were a baby, so they dont have to be cognizant of the procedure.

 

I've been with both, but I think cut looks nicer

 

see. My point exactly.

 

looks and function don't mean the same. should you really cut flesh off a baby just because you think it looks better. i think not. let the person grow up and choose if he wants to alter his body or not. but altering someone elses body because you think it looks better violates basic human rights. remember beauty is in the eye of the beholder. would you like someone altering your body to what they think looks better regardless of what you think

 

Considering I was circumcised, prefer being circumcised, but probably would not have done it myself at age 20, I'd say the answer to your question is yes.

 

An uncircumcised penis just looks normal to me. Circumcised looks weird and unnatural. I honestly don't think it's right to cut off skin that's natural, but then again it's along the same lines as piercing body parts, getting gauges or tattoos, etc. I know my child won't be, but I won't condemn those who choose to. I don't understand it, but do what you like. I pierced my nose and ears and people were wondering why, it's the same principal so whatevs.