So the government is hiding a new car that runs on water. No gas, no bio-fuel, but pure water. They don't want us to know about it. See they want to keep us in the dark and they want us to drink beer. They are keeping the water supply for themself. That's why we are constantly bombarded with beer commercials. . Think about it man.
they're legalizing weed because they want us to drink beer? that makes no sense; the fact that weed is illegal is the number one reason that i ever drink beer.
That's actually two seperate trains of thought that got mixed in together. The weed actually has nothing to do with the car that runs on water. That's a whole different rant. Guess I shouldn't type on the computer when I'm high. Lol. But since you brought the subject of pot up. My take is this. If they legalize pot and it is legal in a lot of places then they can keep us docile and under their control. It is all part of their plan to keep us from questioning their decisions and legilation that does not benefit the average person.
A DARPA scientist just applied for a patent on a cheap room temperature superconductor. Water powered cars are for kids. With one of these babies you could collect 99% of your breaking energy, add a little extra with a few cheap solar power cells, and drive anywhere in the country without stopping until the car falls apart after maybe 300,000 miles. Using supercapacitors, it could go from zero to 200 in the shortest time theoretically possible, pushing as much current as you want without generating heat and frying the wires. Drag racing would never be the same again. Between the motors and the supercapacitors and the superconductors, it would weight a quarter or less of current vehicles, and people may commonly pick up one end to park them a little better, making them ideal for vertical take off and landing. Commercial aircraft commonly do about 550mph, because going faster gets a little more hairy.
now that i can believe. there is a lot of government energy spent on high profile distractions. plus, stoned people do tend to worry less about stuff, unless they're the naturally paranoid type.
oh loardy this one again. you may or may not know, but people were talking about that in the 1940s well there are conditions, circumstances, technologies, but not like, you know, a gas powered internal combustion engine. now sometimes, when the tanks at the gas station are low, the pumps suck up water and who knows what all else, and as long as its not too much in proportion, the engine will still run, but its not really running ON water. of course for those who believe in the f.m. theory of the universe (effing magic), have a blissful trip, and thanks for going meta. (bong water?) (also "the government" is "hiding", how about corporate greed is "hiding" everything people are too mentally lazy to get off their ass in front of a television and crack open a book. you'd be amazed how many things are "hiding" in them)
If they ever make a car that runs on water, you could put a water filter in the bottom of the tank.... Then just pee in it Instead of even bothering to get the garden hose
"excuthe me ociffer, i hath a long dribe ahead of me so i had to drink all the beers to hab enough fuel."
Ever heard of the carburetor that could get a car to go 100mpg? Apparently in the mid 1960s some guy invented such a thing, and then the government whisked him away in the night and he was unpersoned.
Pretty sure the water car has been developed many many moons ago and the men paid off by oil companies. Why would an industry produce a car that the oil companies can't make money from?
At least this thread is in the proper section. Louis Enricht's water pill. Sent to Sing Sing for fraud, 1916. John Andrews tried to interest the U.S. Navy in his powder, then disappered to Canada, 1917. Charles H. Garrett's electrolysis carburetor, September 8, 1935. Didn't work. Guido Franch's green powder, turned out to be food coloring. Convicted of fraud 1979. Stanley Meyer's water splitter spark plug replacement...no wait, fuel cell, in the '80s. Convicted of fraud. Wang Hongcheng's Hongcheng Magic Liquid, 1983. Ten years in prison for fraud by the Chinese. Ramar Pillai had a miraculous bush that produced a fuel...turned out to be kerosene, 1996. Convicted of fraud in India 2016. Hydrogen Technology Applications electrolyser, 2002. The company rescinded it's claims. Patrick Kelly's Genesis World Energy got $2.5 million from investors in 2003. Never produced a product. Patrick Kelly was sentenced to five years in prison for theft and fraud. Genepax's onboard energy generator was found to use metal hydride, which isn't water, 2008. Daniel Dingel partnered with Formosa Plastic Group to manufacture his device. In 2008 Formosa Plastic Group had him imprisoned for 20 years for fraud. Dr Ghulam made the claim in 2011. He claimed his car ran on 60% water and 40% diesel. A 100% water fueled car never appeared. etc.
Ha-ha. All this rubbish has been going on for years. While the latent effect of water in an engine can keep the charge air cooler, it is not a fuel and the potential damage is considerable. Steam case hardening piston rings will cause loss or compression and when the brittle ring fractures the damage is catastrophic. Water emulsifying with lube oil has similar disastrous effects. Idiots generating hydrogen by local electrolysis weaken the fuel air mix in a mistaken attempt to compensate, raising the exhaust gas temperature to a point that destroys exhaust valves within 1000 miles In fact, the hydrogen has a negative effect, since the drag on the alternator producing it exceeds the return.. . My current 2 liter car returned 76,mpg on a recent trip, entirely due to Bosch electronics and 2050,bar injectors. No doubt my driving style along with a 50,mph speed limit for much of the 200 mile journey helped. Not a single drop or water was damaged during the entire journey.. LMAO. Despite all the claims of water powered cars over the last 30 years, no one has ever agreed to have then accurately tested. When challenged, the inventors just vanish into thin air. Needless to say, the conspiracy nut jobs will claim that men in black suits were responsible.
One quarter of the world economy depends on fossil fuel exports. Not only would the world economy collapse, but billions of people would have no way to make a living. The military has power cells that work by pissing in them, but its not the same.
The truth is always interesting. The fuel saving by fuel water injection (Dr Ghulam) is theoretically possible, but it would destroy a reciprocating engine (see my reply to Tmemnax) It was used on jet engines during vertical takeoff, but the superheated steam caused rapid oxidation and subsequent erosion of the jet turbine if used in flight.