CAMPBELL34 VS. LIBERTINE :The War To Settle The Score...

I NEVER suggessted that. I said that "I can't see it, it must not exist" is stupid logic, not the opposite.

ooooh sticks and stones.

 

Do you SEE air?

 

How do you know what you're breathing is Air?

I see nothing infront of my eyes.

 

HA HA...air (a physical component) is testable. It can be demonstrated as what it is and what it does.

Unlike your sky friend...

 

Prove it.

 

Inhale.

 

How do you know that what you're inhaling is "air"

You know what, I'll save you the time. Whatever sources you bring up, I'm going to say they're unreliable.

And whatever chemical compounds you bring up, I'll believe those are unreliable too. Because I believe science is all HORSESHIT, HORSESHIT, HORSESHIT.

...

You see what I'm doing? I'm acting exactly like you do.

 

What I am inhaling is oxygen. It has been tested.

Of course you will, because you live in fairytale world. Ha ha...

Comparing KNOWN FACTS to your delusionary beliefs and claiming they are just as viable. Puh-leeze...

You're forgetting I am not your congregation of sheeple. I actually THINK for myself.

 

It's a joke mate. I actually do believe that air exists.

But for the sake of the joke, I did exactly what the atheists do: Saying I don't believe it, telling them to bring up sources, and then calling them unreliable.

 

That's because YOUR sources were propagandists! Ha ha...

Of course, CHRISTIAN EVANGELICAL sources will confirm CHRISTIAN "findings".

 

Sheesh...if the average christian sources convinced us then we'd be christian now, wouldn't we?

 

Well what, do you think ATHEISTICAL SOURCES ARE GOING TO GO OUT AND PROVE THE RED SEA CROSSING?

 

Science has explored it.

 

What the hell is an "atheistical" source? Ha ha ha...

Do you mean SECULAR?

No, I am saying that I have yet to find one major or minor UNBIASED, UN-EVANGELICAL, source of your claims.
:sunglasse

 

Sorry, you're right, the word is secular.

But still, you want us to find un-evangelical, un-christian sources. Well, why would anyone else be looking into the red sea?

Might as well ask Christian experts to go to the Easter Island and research the Bird Man cult

 

Do you just ignore everything that doesn't fit into your argument? I have posted multiple links in multiple posts here about the nearly 5000 dives that have been preformed during escavations of the Red Sea. First dives started in 1969 and many more during the 90's. People have been and are down there looking for stuff. The Red Sea was a major alley of shipment and trade, so there are ancient shipwrecks and plenty of goodies for the archeological community.

http://www.saudiaramcoworld.com/iss...nds.shipwreck-the.red.sea.in.global.trade.htm
http://www.adventurecorps.com/sadana/94survey.html
http://www.thebeadsite.com/UNI-BER.html
http://www.archaeogate.org/egittologia/article.php?id=182
http://www.archeogate.it/egittologia/article.php?id=339&offset=1
http://www.rqad.leeds.ac.uk/quseir.asp


As you can see, there has been and still are plenty of archeologists studying the area.

 

Who was it, that said a nine-mile-long ship carrying thousands of men/chariots/etc was incredibly illogical?

 

What are you talking about? There has been enough chariots and men found at the bottom of the Red Sea to cover nine miles? I think I would have heard of that. It is incredibly illogical.

 

see other thread re shipwrecks. they do spread, debris often found miles away from the original vessel.

 

Oh, well that is just common sense. I just had no idea what he was talking about...9 mile long ships carrying chariots and men...didn't know what to make of it...