CAMPBELL34 VS. LIBERTINE :The War To Settle The Score...

This statement is not provable. You do know it is not provable, don't you?

 

In the statement that you quote I am saying that if something requires a particular 'willful' thought, initially, in order occur and that thought is stopped from occurring according to a belief, for example, then that something will not occur.


.

 

Thank You. Again, this proves my point.

 

I fail to see that I made a statement, Kharakov. What I see is a question.

 

Lemme rephrase that.

"This statement is not provable" <-- that statement is self referential.

just showing you a true statement that cannot be proven. Check out the Godel's theorum part of the liar's paradox page at wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox.

 

Subjective. Relative. *yawn*

 

It is the answer to your question.

 

cooloner having read this post .........firstly you write = i really dont have much knowledge on the religion ....... then = but i know better than that . ...hmmm please tell me ..........i mean if you dont have knowledge of that religion " how do you know better than that ?...............you have no knowledge so how do you know better ?..........whats the scores between libertine and campbell by the way ?......here"s a nice picture to chill too........peace

 

i think its obvious that jehovahs witnesses hacked your computer

 

LIBERTINE : 1 (one question presented)
CAMPBELL : -100 (missed opportunities to answer it)


YES, NICE PHOTO.

 

cheatin eh lib ...........scoring points for yourself ..........tear down the wall........floyd moment there man ........hhhmmmmmmmmm

 

Not really.

Just saying that I have asked ONE question and have been given NO legitimate answers, only hundreds of petty failures built on anecdotal evidence, testimony and crying.

 

The wall is one of my least favorite pink floyd songs
why is it so popular
have a cigar, time, and many others are so much more deserving

 

anecdotal evidence..........please lib.....what does anecdotal evidence mean to you personally ? ...............dictionaries all around people .

 

music forum .............this way ..>

 

It doesn't mean shit to me when trying to answer the question that was asked at the beginning of the thread, thus I exposed it as "anecdotal" (which it is).

 

Libertine,


How are you ? Questions: What qualities in matter would you speculate are responsible for consciousness and at what point of "reduction," if any, do these qualities become nonsignificant ? Note: I am aware that initially and 'down the road' in considering these questions there are important "definition of terms" issues that must be considered, so we could start with the question, "what is consciousness ?" Mind you, I am a 'slowpoke' but constantly moving (like a snail).



David

 

I only have "theories" because I do not "know" the answers to such questions.

My theories are only worth as much as anyone else's theories, thus they are either worth a lot or nothing--it's all relative, really.

So, "What Is Consciousness?" Self Awareness the definition you are looking for? There are many definitions of consciousness. Which one do you consider to be the true definition as used in your question?

Suppose we skip the formalities and go straight for the gut. What do you insinuate was the "origin" of consciousness? I am the skeptic here. I'll plead ignorance. You tell me.

 

I believe that, in reality, awareness implies some level of self-awareness and that present definitions of self-awareness will soon undergo significant modification. This is (obviously) not to say that there are not distinct "modes" of self-awareness. Consciousness = Awareness.

 

Ok, one moment while I peck at this keyboard.