Blind Pregnant Mother Gets 3D Printed Ultrasound Of Her Baby

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by Fueled by Coffee, May 12, 2015.

  1. 6-eyed shaman

    6-eyed shaman Sock-eye salmon

    Messages:
    10,378
    Likes Received:
    5,155
    4 people like this.
  2. deleted

    deleted Visitor

    that makes technology awesome..
     
  3. shygurl170

    shygurl170 Members

    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    148
    Amazing!
     
  4. Dude111

    Dude111 An Awesome Dude HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    11,087
    Likes Received:
    1,405
    I do wish them all the best :)
     
  5. 6-eyed shaman

    6-eyed shaman Sock-eye salmon

    Messages:
    10,378
    Likes Received:
    5,155
    I bet this will lead to lots of parents, blind or not, to get 3d prints of their unborn babies just as keepsakes.
     
  6. Gongshaman

    Gongshaman Modus Lascivious

    Messages:
    4,602
    Likes Received:
    999
    Right? But they'll need to print the whole baby...in a realistically pigmented rubbery polymer
     
  7. Logan 5

    Logan 5 Confessed gynephile Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    2,600
    Likes Received:
    195
    AFAIC ultrasound damages the baby. Why risk the baby's health just for a picture or to know their gender? Isn't that a form of child abuse? Why not give your baby Down's Syndrome or cancer just because of....?
    Not saying that ultrasound causes either of those, but it's so greedy and selfish that people are willing to take such a risk on the behalf of their own child for "something" like a pic or knw if they're a boy or a girl?
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. xenxan

    xenxan Visitor

    Cool, but why. Even a non blind person only sees an ultrasound image anyway and its not much to look at. I guess it is the same as the parents caring around a $2000 camera and photographing every movement their child/children make. It is fine but ultimately unnecessary. It only creates a fake picture when the child gets sick of "Billy, over here, smile" " wait, one more, smile for mommy"
     
  9. Aerianne

    Aerianne Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    37,095
    Likes Received:
    17,180
    I really liked being surprised at birth.

    In 1982, I had one ultrasound during my first pregnancy to rule out twins. I did not want to know gender.

    I had no ultrasound during my second pregnancy in 1986.

    It was old school and it was fun.

    I can't compare it to what goes on now. I don't know how that feels.

    I did know the gender of my four grandchildren prior to birth. It was helpful with shopping and decorating; especially with the triplets.

    I still think being surprised by the baby's gender was magical.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice