Bible Questions? III

I asked you.

I don't believe I said I denied the Christ.

I beg your pardon, what are you trying to say here?

The scripture says;

To the extent that YOU did it to one of the least of these my brothers, YOU did it to me.

just wondering why you left out the brothers part.

So are you saying you think Satan is not a real person but is a concept?

Well that explains a lot.

The Bible is and as you just said you are not talking about that.

the one is the Bible is doing a lot and will continue to do so.

and let's not forget, was resurrected.

Is that why you seem to think you can just make it up as you go along?

Yes he did.

Yes, the Bible is the living word of God.

 

Paul says it 3 other times, but I think they would be translated differently as well.

 

Peter denied association with Christ because he afraid of suffering pain and ridicule. You are afraid also of being unworthy, and by the constraints of condition, afraid to be worthy as well.

So you could better see who brothers were.

Yes, everything you see around you is an idea. He turned and said to Peter, get behind me Satan. Is Peter Satan?

Actually, Jesus said remember me, not write it down.
What he did say, beware the scribes.

 

The secular expression for this is for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

 

The bible is not the resurrected Christ, the bible is a book.

 

You might want to phrase it a little differently next time.

Thanks for trying to read my mind, I wouldn't quit your day job.

The actual question was why did YOU leave it out?

No Peter was not Satan but that does not mean that Satan is not a person. Also both Jesus and the rest of the Bible indicate that Satan is an actual person.

The Bible is God's Word not Jesus' word and so they wrote down what God inspired them to write and did not need Jesus to tell them to write it down.

As for the Scribes, Jesus was not saying to beware of them because they wrote things down but because they were false religious teachers.

 

This has no application to what you were talking about.

 

The Bible is God's word and is alive.

 

Why? What is your scriptural basis for that.

I see the mind of the sonship which belongs to all of us.

I didn't, I know who my brothers are, those who do the will of the father.

Jesus did not speak God's word then. Heaven and earth will pass away but my words shall remain. He didn't say, the words of the bible shall remain.
The teaching of Jesus is an oral transmission, it is still an oral transmission.

Scribes are translators, copying text or taking dictation.

 

Yes it does.
The word condition means to "speak with". The condition of blame has two elements, the blamer and the blamed. These two seemingly contradictory forces, guilty not guilty are in lock step to produce the blamed or guilty condition. That is why a verdict of not guilty is the verdict that raises the dead.
However if one is not willing to accept redemption, learn what it means, I desire mercy not sacrifice, then he will be imprisoned until he pays every penny of his debt for the crucifixion of his brother.

 

Are you really that .... Never mind, it's just another example of your not seeing the forest for the trees.

Then why don't you know what you are talking about?

You did but won't admit it.

Jesus spoke nothing of his own originality but only what his father told him.

And where are those words to be found? Perhaps among those you makeup for him?

Been talking to your spirit guide again have you?

Normally that would be true but by the time Jesus came to earth the word “scribes” designated a class of men learned in the Law. They made the systematic study of the Law and its exposition their professional occupation. They were evidently among the teachers of the Law, the ones versed in the Law. They were generally associated with the religious sect of the Pharisees, for this body recognized the interpretations or “traditions” of the scribes that had developed in course of time into a bewildering maze of minute, technical regulations.

 

Translation, Theology.

 

Tongues of fire.

 

None of this is to found in the Bible.

Again stringing together disconnected scriptures taken out of context.

 

In the heart of those who hear him, communicating to us with the voice of our whole spirit, the Holy Spirit.

 

Again brother, who would you deny Christ to, and who would you deny the Holy Spirit accept me?

 

Simply brother, the measure you give is the measure you get. Yes it is in there.

 

Actually the traditions of man, you know things people make up instead of following the Word of God.

 

No, the tongues of fire were to show that the Holy Spirit had been poured out and seeing as your "spirit guide" continues to lead you away from God it can hardly be compared to the Holy Spirit.

 

As I have pointed out repeatedly, your "spirit" continues to disagree with what God says through the Bible, and so what you hear communicating with you can not be the Holy Spirit, because Holy Spirit can not disagree with God.