Being bad with figures AND what is for ordinate counting.

Existentialists really didn't know how to count up to a cardinal number. Being good with figures was a stigma to them, which came out as a result of engineered transcendental memorization. That is the subject of being and denying meta-physics for the psychology of quantitative objectivity. So what meta-physically caused religion to Exist was the presence in the World, a world detached of either God OR the particular individual remarking on the system of counting that was supposed to realize in the Nature, as it were; and the one that He created for himself for qualitative adjustment.

Thus there is also the object of reality and denying ontological errors through the counting Being of the Cardinal for the function to perform in the world by the Existenz at transcending. This is where being good or bad at figures is ultimately declared. But the cardinal quantifying is represented in the mechanical social structure that makes the profit for ignorance of Nature work.

Nature is God in that ultimately a fulfilled ignorance about Nature is worked at, and falsifying Meta-physics and How God created the world (Man in the world). Nature working is a fallacy about God's creation, not God Himself.

Is this agreeable to other members of this web-site?:love:

 

Why not!
I would however be more brief considering all your accounting gone before mine and say, anxiety is caused by the misapprehension of what is so.