As above so below

everything is everything. Being overtly cryptic is something else

 

In terms of the absolute every thing else is an abstraction. What I am saying is plainly stated.

 

No one can ever really see what, if anything is absolute. Therefore how, in comparison, could everything else appear abstract? What is everything else a distorted or abstract version of?

 

Reality is non local nor is it remote. There are no discreet systems in nature.
What we perceive is a corridor of refraction, reflected light. You are absolutely real. You are not on your way to becoming real, However reality is in a constant state of becoming, it is always currently emergent.

 

Yes, but I am the center of my own reality, my reality is perceived from myself and outwards, and if that is in a constant state of becoming, than that would mean that I as well am in a constant state of becoming. As to whether or not that is becoming real, I don't know. What is real? One cannot possibly separate the 'real' from 'the non-real'.But I am perceiving my world which moves within itself, but does not move within something else, that I know of, as we can never really know what exists outside of our own reality, maybe nothing.

 

Everything is real, however something is not everything.
Nothing does not exist.

 

....or perhaps God.

 

When I say constant state of becoming, I mean we are new creation in every moment.

 

Is everything not just an illusion falsly conceived by our senses which fool us at all times, our sense are greatly capable of error.

 

Ok, I understand what you meant now. I agree.

 

perhaps yes.

 

Do you regard yourself real or not? What is this existential angst?

 

You are an agreeable sort.

 

I do consider myself to be an existentialist. And no, I do not consider myself to be real. I think (I won't use believe as I don't 'believe' in anything) that I am an illusion created by light and senses. An illusion that (say if one could see with perfect vision) is a branch, or version of, the one true 'thing' that is everything. A mass of 'stuff' which I consider to be in the vaguest sense, 'god'.

 

I agree with people when they present me with knowledge or things that seem logical to my mind.

 

I identify as energy. It is the homo-centric perception that questions validity.

 

if the female form is good is it god

 

As I pointed out I don't know you personally but as I said, I have love for all, thus I have love for you.

Agape.

 

Sorry, could you say that in English.

 

If you call it good, you have invoked goodness.