Are we witnessing the collapse of America?

Discussion in 'Conspiracy' started by StpLSD25, Jun 5, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 1r0n_0x1d3

    1r0n_0x1d3 Member

    Messages:
    883
    Likes Received:
    4
    And now the reason we are fucked!
     
  2. Rocky and Trish

    Rocky and Trish Member

    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    2
    What we are witnessing, thank god, is the collapse of the GOP. We are also witnessing the rebuilding of the America it was intended to be. Liberty and Justice for ALL. I think the GOP has forgotten that part of the pledge.
     
  3. StpLSD25

    StpLSD25 Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    11
    I think both parties forgot it. Don't come at me with your Obama democrat loving propaganda!!! I know what Obama's really about!!! (NDAA,HR 347, CISPA , unconstitutional wars, Martial Law etc etc etc.)

    Big Brother is alive and well...
     
  4. Still Kicking

    Still Kicking Members

    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    42
    The official government explanation does not make sense based on what I have seen in the videos, and my observation of numerous building demolitions using explosives. To me, these buildings look pretty much like every other building being demolished with explosives or thermite like material.

    I guess we could hash this topic back and forth forever. What it boils down to is what each person believes happened. I believe the WTC buildings were demolished from within.
     
  5. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    I would be interested to know your version of events in more detail - but understand you not wishing to get into it to much.
     
  6. Karl Rand

    Karl Rand Member

    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    13
    Duplicate post deleted
     
  7. Karl Rand

    Karl Rand Member

    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    13
    I'd be interested to know how those who arranged demolishion from within the WTC timed the event so well to happen just after a terrorist attack. Alternately are we expected to believe terrorists were in collusion with those behind the 'demolition'? Are we to assume those behind the demolishion were working for the same jihadists as those flying the planes? Something doesn't add up here. Not to worry, I'm sure someone will find a conspiracy theory to explain it all.
     
  8. storch

    storch banned

    Messages:
    5,293
    Likes Received:
    719
    Landing gear from a plane flies right through the building, including the core-structure, and lands on the street below. Something doesn't add up here. Not to worry. I'm sure someone will find an official theory to explain it.

    And if you really must know, those who were behind the demolitions work for themselves.
     
  9. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26

    Have you any evidence for the unofficial story of three entire buildings being rigged with explosives?
    Susan Lindauer says it was a couple of trucks a week or so before 9/11.
    Atleast with the engine/gear parts there are pictures.
    I think in your and others scenario the pixies came in at night and fixed the building up with out anybody realising.
    Maybe they rigged the building as they were renovating the entire building - which happened when?
    If you want something that doesn't add up - plane parts are not it, imho.
     
  10. Rocky and Trish

    Rocky and Trish Member

    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    2
    Nobody came at you dumb ass. You must subscribe to the GOP junky Rush Limpballs mailing.

     
  11. StpLSD25

    StpLSD25 Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    11
    No retards!! I just see what OBAMA's really doing! Fuck democrats like you!!! You don't even know what I believe in!! I don't side with the GOP for shit, but I'm also smart enough to know, DEMOCRATS are no different!!!

    Obama's a scam!!!
     
  12. scratcho

    scratcho Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    24,488
    Likes Received:
    16,299
    And you think you've found a good way to get your points across? Fuck you retards? Fuck democrats like you? You're making yourself look pretty bad,man.
     
  13. storch

    storch banned

    Messages:
    5,293
    Likes Received:
    719
    Odon,

    Yes, there are photos of the landing gear. Unfortunately you appear to not understand what that means in light of the fact that the core-structure stood in its way.

    You are fond of logical fallacies, aren't you? It's like you're saying, "The buildings came down in a controlled manner. However, since I am unaware of the technique used, they were not brought down in a controlled manner."

    But Odon, they came down in a controlled manner. All three of them, Odon, regardless of aircraft involvement!! They came down in a controlled manner. You cannot even admit the obvious.

    I have no doubt that if I post evidence that someone had the opportunity to place thermite charges in the building, you will find another avenue of denial.

    It's killing you that you can't explain away obvious controlled demolitions, and so you're trying to move the focus onto something less obvious; something like the means of demolition.
     
  14. storch

    storch banned

    Messages:
    5,293
    Likes Received:
    719
    If you show yourself to be at least observant enough to recognize the obvious when you see it, then maybe I'll move on to a discussion of less obvious things . . . like means. But what would be the point in explaining to you how something was possibly done when you can't even admit that something was done in the first place--even though you saw it yourself?
     
  15. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    Post something that makes a case for thermite explosions or any type of explosives. Post how and when it could be done. Don't say: well, there was explosives in the building because somebody heard them/look how it looks like a controlled demolition. Don't say: well x, y and z heard explosions so. Don't say: Some woman heard from someone that someone saw someone see something a week or so before.
     
  16. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    All you are saying is: "The buildings came down in a controlled manner. They look like they were. I am aware of the techniques used. They were brought down in a controlled manner."

    How about I say: Wow, Yes, my goodness...they do look like they were brought down in what looks like a controlled demolition. Will you say: Well, you are just being sarcastic. I don't have to prove my POV. Isn't it obvious.

    I think it's about time for the alternative story to be scrutinised.
     
  17. StpLSD25

    StpLSD25 Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    11
    People here are always bad talking the GOP! Isn't it a little hypocritical??

    Democrats/Liberals act like if you have a problem with Obama, it MUST be his skin color. It's def not his drone strikes,NDAA,HR347,CISPA etc. Oh no! Those bastards are RACIST!!!


    At least I know the truth; 98% of Americans are unintellectual followers, (Sheeple) who either vote red or blue EVERY election, even if their guy sucks.


    And yes, I mean Obama... He's "certainly no Jack Kennedy."
     
  18. storch

    storch banned

    Messages:
    5,293
    Likes Received:
    719
    So, Odon, is it your opinion that they didn't go down in a controlled manner?
     
  19. storch

    storch banned

    Messages:
    5,293
    Likes Received:
    719
    And Odon, when didn I say that some woman heard from someone . . .?
     
  20. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    Oh for pity's sake. NO.


    I didn say you did. I said don't say that.

    It's time to post your theory now - in detail.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice