Anyone else think the moon landing was a fake?

well, it's nice to have a hobby.

 

Well, if the aryan brotherhood of texas is ABT, would that make them the aryan brotherhood of space, abbreviated ABS?

They sound like very safety conscious people.

I wonder, is the californian aryan brotherhood now ABC? to differentiate them from the texan ones?

 

......:rofl:



Cheers Glen.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=328WhjAXpcs"]Pink Floyd - The Dark Side of the Moon (1973) [Full Album] (HD 1080p) - YouTube

 

Nope, I don't believe it. Fuck Mythbusters!

 

Since my buds and I have gotten into this, we have had more than a bit of smug faced fun, enjoying all the delicious perks that go along with speaking truth by virtue of "authority", in this case our authority as practicing physicians and patriotic Americans, people with a love of country, and as such, with a mind toward busting the Apollo fraud wide open.

You're point about the "rocket scientist" business is an excellent one, a card played beyond its hilt by official Apollo narrative apologists when engaged in debate. As you'll see, we play that card too.

Official Apollo narrative apologists say unto us, "So FATTYDASH, THE VOICE OF THE APOLLO DOCS OF SAN FRANCISCO, what gives you the right/authority to argue credibly to the effect that not only Apollo, but all of the U.S. Manned Space Program was fraudulent in the sense that it was a front for U.S. space based military efforts and not a program that sought to, and succeeded in landing men upon the moon?"

Not an unreasonable question, a rhetorical question/statement really.

For many of those that have followed our group's efforts with open minds since they began in April of 2011, there is no question that our credibility is 10 plus robust. Since we have been writing/posting, making videos, giving little talks in the community at astronomy group meetings and so forth, we have yet to run into any other physician, or group of physicians that have been able to effectively counter our claim, the claim that Apollo's inauthenticity, Apollo's fraudulence, can readily be demonstrated by carefully examining the illnesses of the astronauts, including those STAGED illnesses of Borman, Slayton, Shepard, Duke/Mattingly. No NASA flight surgeon or NASA based member of the medical community has even attempted to engage us in debate, let alone win a single point for the official Apollo narrative side.

Our group has been able to incontrovertibly demonstrate that medical considerations prove Apollo fraudulent, and though we are not rocket scientists to be sure, we ARE PHYSICIANS, AND VERY GOOD ONES. A formal background in rocket science is hardly needed to see/understand that Borman's phony bout of cislular diarrhea, Slayton's bogus atrial fibrillation problem and cure, Shepard's bogus Meniere's disease problem and cure, and Charles Duke's/Ken Mattingly's fraudulent "rubella scare", proves the official Apollo narrative to be UNTRUE, and that these medical concerns demonstrate without a hint of uncertainty that Apollo was/is FRAUDULENT. Our expertise as physicians gives us all the authority and credibility we need. We are very very smart, and very very correct as regards these most critical points.

The work of my group has also shown that no aerospace degree is required in terms of one's seeing that the official narrative is inconsistent and internally incoherent, therefore, it is an official narrative which is indeed necessarily UNTRUE. Witness our dismantling of Tom Stafford's story, the fairy tale he and others tell about the Apollo 12 launch pad lightning strike. Stafford first claimed he did not see lightning hit the pad, this at the post launch press conference. Then, years later, Stafford wrote in his book WE HAVE CAPTURE that he did see lightning hit the pad. Such internal incoherence/inconsistence, such lying, proves Apollo fraudulent and the appreciation of said inconsistencies/incoherencies/LIES hardly requires an aerospace degree.

Patrick covered this subject quite well in other threads, and I'll not bother to rehash here. I will publish my own PERP list soon and will cover some of this fraudulent lightning strike stuff when I present the nefarious Apollo associated activities of arch PERP and phony ain'tstronaut Tom Stafford. As with the bogus lightning strike, ditto for the LOST BIRD theme. No aerospace degree required. As mentioned, I'd like to move beyond Patrick's great work. By beyond, I mean address deeper issues.

Here's Patrick's last PERP LIST. We've caught a few dozen more PERPS since this appeared last MAY. For what it's worth, it appears as though Patrick's list may have been removed from the original web site where it first appeared. If that is true. LOOK OUT. Talk about hitting a nerve, talk about the truth hurting.

http://occupyilluminati.com/an-apollo-fraud-perpetrator-list/

These are the men that stole money from your parents. Makes ya' kinda' mad, don't it, especially now that WE KNOW EXACTLY WHO THEY WERE/ARE?

 

We never said the US planted missile on the moon. We said they planted an LRRR, a laser reflecting mirror on the moon. Data obtained from bouncing light off that mirror can tell one how far the moon is from the earth is. That data can also tell us how strong the earth's gravitational field strength is. The latter piece of data, earth gravitational field strength, is needed to program an earth based missile so that it can effectively target Moscow.

Apollo need not have planted one "bomb"/missile in space, probably didn't, though I do not know that with certainty. That said, Apollo did plant many pieces of military equipment in space, like the LRRR/Lunar Laser RetroReflector. This equipment was and is to this day, used by military people in weapons systems per se, and in their development.

There are no missiles on the moon. But we know for a fact that the equipment that was planted on the moon such as the Apollo 11 LRRRR makes our earth based missiles more effective/accurate/capable.

 

No actually, what we say unto you is, show us evidence. Not "might have"s or "could have"s or "it stands to reason"s, but actual evidence that the Apollo astronauts didn't land on the moon.

There ain't any.

 

Of all the Apollo Missions, 13 is the easiest one to tear apart, the easiest one about which one can demonstrate patent fraudulence.

Here's a nice little video done by Jason and Torry of our group. This video does a splendid job of demonstrating Apollo 13 fraudulence by way of exposing ain'tstronaut John Young as a big fat liar.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvoQL4RqQpA"]John Young and Sy Leibergot, TWO VERSIONS, ONE REALITY, FRAUD!!! - YouTube

These sorts of discoveries, the demonstration of Apollo fraud perpetrator lying, lying with clear and obvious intention/motivation, are incredibly important. No aerospace degree is required here in one's understanding that John Young was lying about his presence in the Mission Control room at the time of the Apollo 13 O2 tank staged explosion. As such, the curious student of US history finds Apollo truth is his or hers to have and hold, straightaway no less, simply by virtue of carefully reading the official narrative, and when inconsistencies are found, when one is confronted with internal incoherencies such as that presented here in the JOHN YOUNG IS A BIG FAT LIAR VIDEO by my own group's Jason and Torry, one realizes straight away the understanding of the Apollo scam requires little more than common sense, that and an appreciation for the fact there have been times when the American government has held its citizenry in full on contempt.

Telling people we landed on the moon? It really does go light years beyond the pale, and emphasizes how we were, and how we are, taken for royal stooges. Take note president Obama, you can turn this all around and go a long way to righting this dinged up leaky boat simply by copping to the truth here. Wadda' ya' say buddie ?

 

Your main strategy still seems to be name-calling and a big ego.... we get it, you're totally special and think you have some sort of authority to say.... anything.

You simply don't have the forceful presence that you seem to think.... I don't think anyone disagreeing with you is apologetic, where did you get THAT idea? You type like we BETTER listen to you, or something...... you play up credentials like they matter, like whoever being a doctor lends ANY shred of credibility to what you're saying. But mostly, you call people names. If you're using credentials, you won't mind sharing your full real-life identities, right? I'll call your practice tomorrow and ask to speak with you, and report back on if you're real and can confirm all of this, and if you seem to have a real office.... will check the number against the address and google earth it, too.

Also, you continue to insist that because you found an inconsistancy in some generic magazine article or ghost-written autobiography shit that it automatically effects the thing that these people are talking about. You have repeatedly stated that because one thing is not true, both options can not be true.... and thus neither are true. And neither of these second steps makes ANY sense, especially for someone with a tenth of the education that you claim to have.

 

I don't think a secret this big would be kept underwraps for so long. I believe we went.

 

So what you are saying is that you don't actuaally have any evidence.

 

I can't take anyone who uses expressions such as 'patent fraudulence' and 'inauthenticity' seriously. Especially when they purport to be well informed and erudite.

 

:iagree:

and what's with all the editing notes; added comma, dotted I, crossed T
Talk about being obsessive and anal.

I'm also trying to wrap my head around why somebody who claims to be a doctor who graduated med school in the 80's would have an avatar pic that looks like some 20 year old taking the obligatory "self-pic with my phone in the bathroom mirror", by the way, you forgot the duck lips.
Just don't make sense I'm telling ya, it must be some elaborate hoax.

That's it....
FATTYDASH IS FAKE!!!!!! IT'S ALL A COVER-UP THAT REACHES TO THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF WORLD GOVERNMENT!
I KNOW IT'S ALL FAKE BECAUSE SOME DUDE GOT THE RUNS AND ANOTHER ONE HAD A COLD!!
SEE, PROOF POSITIVE THAT FATTYDASH NEVER EVEN EXISTED AND IT'S ALL A MYTH, HOAX, COMPLETE SUBTERFUGE PERPETRATED AGAINST HUMANITY!!!


oh yeah, one more thing.......


NAZIS ON MARS!!!!

 

Nazis' or no nazi's, you have to admit he was right about the mile-long translucent worm photographed on the surface of mars


Image courtesy of NASA


Hotwater

 

omg .... My ears!!!

 

no...we really don't, man.

but i'm slowly coming round to this space NAZI's on Mars thing

Heil Martian Hitler!

 

As mentioned, I'll not be spending a great deal of time here in this forum rehashing. Below are some links to a few memorable threads by Patrick. You can begin to bring yourself up to speed as regards the relevant EVIDENCE. It would seem you are rather unfamiliar.

I will pose to you a direct challenge KeithBC. See if you can counter this piece of EVIDENCE. Try your hand at debunking just a simple piece of EVIDENCE as presented to the world at large fairly recently by my group, that Apollo can be demonstrated incontrovertibly fraudulent, as Alan Shepard's Meniere's Disease could not possibly have been cured by a William House surgery sometime in 1968 or 1969.

By "CURE" we of course mean both the ear operated on and the contralateral ear, the "good ear" at the time of surgery, were BOTH rendered disease free FOREVER more, Shepard's vertigo eliminated AND his 40dB hearing loss, once viewed as establisdhed/permanent, fixed, the astronaut's hearing restored to NORMAL.

We say Shepard could not possibly have been cured, and ALL of the medical literature, from the time of Shepard's declared illness to this present day supports our view. All of the literature, all physicians specializing in the field of otolaryngology agree with us and say that such shunt surgeries do not restore hearing loss as was so alleged in the Shepard case. In addition, there is nothing in the medical literature to support the contention that a single physician, even Shepard's own doctor, William House himself, would argue that operating on Shepard's left ear would prophylax his right ear and prevent disease from ever developing in that side.

Our EVIDENCE is sound. Our case for Apollo fraud is incontrovertible. Have you got a counter example? Can you present to the curious here, one case besides that of Alan Shepard in which a shunt surgery did what was claimed by Apollo's Chief Physician/clinician Charles Berry and the other NASA flight surgeons; the NASA physicians' claim being the House surgery restored Shepard's 40 dB ESTABLISHED hearing loss, fixed Shepard's diseased left ear, and in addition, miraculously guaranteed the prevention of his right ear's ever becoming involved with Meniere's Disease based pathophysiological changes, changes/disease to which said right ear would have been vulnerable for the balance of Shepard's life were it really the case to begin with that he had Meniere's Disease?

The whole silly thing is ever so bogus.


http://occupyilluminati.com/an-apollo-fraud-perpetrator-list/

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread853082/pg1

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread847051/pg1

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread844752/pg1

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread857111/pg2

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread846757/pg4

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread838299/pg1

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread835747/pg4

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread837129/pg4

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread836777/pg1

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread850806/pg1

http://apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=theories&action=display&thread=3203

http://apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=theories&thread=3203&page=9#92052

http://apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=theories&thread=3203&page=9#92053

Apollo is fraudulent, this we know, and we now know some of the fraud principals. One of them of course being Dr. Charles Berry, quack quack......

 

So you spent $50 for the lifetime membership to make a couple dozen posts in one thread about a hairbrain topic that really doesn't mean a lick of spit in your everyday life, or at least it shouldn't.


You need help.