Another fun climate change thread

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by Vanilla Gorilla, Jan 7, 2019.

  1. Irminsul

    Irminsul Valkyrie

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    196
    Fuck yeah buy a people mover and be the über party bus. :D yeah nah fuck that. But in theory it's cool like if somebody else did it.
     
  2. guerillabedlam

    guerillabedlam _|=|-|=|_

    Messages:
    29,419
    Likes Received:
    6,305
    Have someone get a bus and paint it like the Further Bus that the Merry Pranksters used to trek across the US.

    [​IMG]
     
    Irminsul likes this.
  3. Irminsul

    Irminsul Valkyrie

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    196
    I'd chill on it and smoke some doobies. :)
     
  4. Asmodean

    Asmodean Slo motion rider

    Messages:
    50,551
    Likes Received:
    10,140
    Isn't carpooling a thing over there? Here you can regularly spot a parking 'lot' for carpooling only. They're even used! :) (and they're next to the road (highway usually) and not near any destination so not likely they get used wrongly :p ;)
     
  5. Asmodean

    Asmodean Slo motion rider

    Messages:
    50,551
    Likes Received:
    10,140
    Not sure if joking or aiming to make a serious point... or both :p
     
  6. Irminsul

    Irminsul Valkyrie

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    196
    Well I kind of laughed at it originally... But then I thought.. That's exactly the kind of control and manipulation that would be bestowed upon us. And then I kind of probably looked like this. :p

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588

    Older folk here the word carpooling, theyll think you mean like in Seinfeld, organizing with friends to share a car to work.

    You mean those rental cars already on the side of the road you just use a swipe card to get into. Car sharing, we have them here, they didnt really take off like I thought they would. I have an account with goget. Pretty cheap, $12.50 an hour.

    Still, they started out being everywhere, but now most of them seemed to have disappeared.

    Same with the bicycles you scan with your mobile to unlock, most of them seemed to have vanished

    Even Uber itself didnt seem to have the impact many thought it would, there are still plenty if taxis around

    Im afraid most people dont give a shit, they want to be alone in their own cars, or just stick their hand out and hail a taxi rather than stuff around with an app

    Again, I myself am not being negative, just reporting reality. Uber was supposed to wipe out the taxi industry, what is it, 6 years later, still a shitload of taxis everywhere, the taxi ranks full when I leave work.

    Why Im sceptical about self driving cars if they ever see the light of day, not that I think they are even going to be possible for a long ling time, but when/if they do. People just want to drive their own cars
     
  8. Meliai

    Meliai Members

    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    4
  9. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588
  10. Asmodean

    Asmodean Slo motion rider

    Messages:
    50,551
    Likes Received:
    10,140
    I guess if its laying there and will be cleaned up shortly it would be stupid NOT to use it as a trash bin :p
     
  11. ErikXRclimateactivist

    ErikXRclimateactivist Members

    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    4
    Join Extinction Rebellion
     
  12. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588
    July 2019: A "NASA backed" study says The Thwaites glacier in Antartica will cause a half metre sea level rise.

    'World's most dangerous glacier' half as big as UK could collapse drowning low-lying coasts, Nasa warns


    "Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is now approaching a "tipping point" that would spark an unstoppable flow of ice into the ocean" Unstoppable I tell you!!


    "The situation is so bad that it could happen even under present-day ice-melting rates"

    So, the situation is so bad it could happen

    "And once the "instability" begins, nothing could prevent the ice from melting completely – potentially drowning some low-lying areas of coastline."

    Nothing could prevent it from melting.....well except the sub zero temperatures


    "After reaching the tipping point, Thwaites Glacier could lose all of its ice in a period of 150 years," warned Nasa JPL scientist Helene Seroussi"

    It will take 150 years to melt apparently. Folks at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory seemingly taking a holiday from working out how to propel jets and are now working on how long it takes ice to melt
     
  13. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588
    And the actual report


    Marine ice sheet instability amplifies and skews uncertainty in projections of future sea-level rise

    Which contains this chestnut:

    "framework explaining the role of ice sheet dynamics in setting the amount and structure of uncertainty in sea-level rise projections. We provide such a theoretical framework in this study and find that ice sheet instabilities are amplifiers of uncertainty, which is a common mathematical property of unstable nonlinear systems (22). "

    No study previously could get sea level predictions right, according to them, but they alone had worked out a way

    Hallelujah!!!
     
  14. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,875
    Likes Received:
    15,060
    So they have analyzed a model of a single ice sheet's evolution over time based on one factor only, and a statistical analysis of "a large number of simulations of the future evolution of a West Antarctic glacier using a state-of-the-art numerical ice sheet model with many thousands of evolving quantities." Something that has never been done before.
    They provide the math for over 10,000 simulations, which I don't pretend to understand as I don't know what the Euler–Maruyama method, Stochastic perturbation analysis, autoregressive Gaussian noise process with interannual SD, a decorrelation timescale, or a first-order autoregressive noise process are let alone gravitational driving stress, basal sliding, ice shelf buttressing, ISSM software, and the rest are.

    Maybe you could simplify their analysis for me and point out where they screwed up?
     
  15. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588
    Stochastic just means too random to predict, and perturbation theory just means approximating a more complex system from a simpler one.

    And a gaussian distribution is an approvimation in itself

    The paper isnt complete in the first place, there is no explanation of this magical time series.

    Just seemingly one equation, the dL/dt one which is change in length = averaged snow falling on the glacier × thickness of glacier x length - minus ice leaving the glacier ( which contains a variable of the ratio of sea water to fresh water) - how much the ground under it moves (which includes their little time correlation magic they dont explain)

    And then after all that. We get metres per year to only 2 decimal places.

    ISSM isnt state of the art either, open source, written in python, its been around for at least 15 years, which means it was in development for 10 years before that

    This is a summary from the previous thing published with ISSM, sea level rise predictions for various experiments im millimetres over 100 years

    [​IMG]


    That paper a couple posts above, it is obfuscated on purpose, so news sources in particular dont delve to deeply.

    If the solution contained within so magical, then no one else ever need to try another method, thus every other researcher is out of a job.

    Another very important point is at least one of the researchers who wrote the paper is quoted in the media as saying something like - could raise sea levels by 1/2 metre, but it isnt in the actual paper, because they are not prepared to do it professionally.

    Other than that. If it is such an important topic. Ask yourself, why isnt there a simple english version for the masses

    The reason is, the simpler its explained, the more apparent it is, they are just guessing


    Not that I think there are enough people that give a shit anyway
     
  16. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,875
    Likes Received:
    15,060
    Are you saying theses people are deliberately misleading the news media for some reason?
    When you refer to magic, are you saying there is no scientific basis at all for the paper?

    I looked up Alexander Robel, he appears to be an assistant professor at California Institute of Technology, one of the top ten universities in the world, known for natural sciences and engineering. He holds a B.S. in Physics, Earth and Ocean Sciences, and Mathematics from Duke; and a PhD in Earth and Planetary Sciences from Harvard.
    He appears to have 11 papers relating to Glacier melt published through Cal Tech. Perhaps your concerns are addressed in one of those.
    Marine ice sheet instability amplifies and skews uncertainty in projections of future sea-level rise
    A Simple Model for Deglacial Meltwater Pulses
    Response of Marine-Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities and Stochastic Dynamics
    Tidal modulation of ice shelf buttressing stresses
    Thinning sea ice weakens buttressing force of iceberg mélange and promotes calving
    Persistence and variability of ice-stream grounding lines on retrograde bed slopes

    The role of ice stream dynamics in deglaciation
    Climate science: The long future of Antarctic melting
    Rapid grounding line migration induced by internal ice stream variability
    Dynamics of ice stream temporal variability: Modes, scales, and hysteresis
    Projecting uncertainty onto marine megafauna trajectories


    In addition I notice the paers are coauthered with a number of others.
    E. Tziperman, E. DeGiuli, M.Susan Loziera, Hélène Seroussi, Gerard H. Roe, Stefan F.Gary, George, L.Shillinger, Helen Bailey, Steven J.Bograd, Victor C. Tsai, Marianne Haseloff, Gerard Roe, Brent Minchew, Mark Simons, and Christian Schoof.
    I didn't bother to look into them, but is it your contention that all of these people are conspiring to deceive us, are just guessing, or don't know as much about this stuff as you do?
     
  17. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588

    All that, and yet we get metres per year to only two decimal places. That metres, not millimetres.

    I am saying salt to freshwater ratio at every point in time, the amount the ground will recede, the amount ice in the ground. These are all things impossible to work out

    Conspirying to decieve us noo. Bullshitting to hang on to their jobs, hell yes
     
    Henderson likes this.
  18. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,875
    Likes Received:
    15,060
    Okay. Making things up to keep their jobs, gotcha.
     
    Asmodean likes this.
  19. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588
    The Antartic Mainland at the moment, there is only one spot that every gets over 0 C and even then barely for one month in summer, the tip of the north peninsula
     
  20. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,588
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Why is it so damn hard to find a picture of this thing from 40 years ago?
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice