America and Britain. How close?

You can say that again.
Who actually talks like that in all seriousness?
For Gods sake, J0hn, think before opening your trap

 

I too would support an invasion of the USA. We need to open up a can of whup ass right here.:cheers2:

 

Mindless morons...that's who.
Possibly terrorist facilitators, also...but I could be overstepping the mark there.

 

You forgot low down dirty commies, and let's not miss out the scoundrels and the ne'er-do-wells...

 

Bloody scallies

 

True.
I did.
I forgot the Morning Star readers as well, but they are all commies, right?

 

And the crackheads, the spades and the queers...

 

No, not them.
We have to draw the line somewhere.
Even crackheads, spades and the queers have an ounce of common sense within them.
Lets leave the self blame to the right targets, yes.

 

Can we at least blame the jews?

 

Just how far would you get with almost 14 million Scots of 20-25 million Scot Irish in the states? I would support it the other way around and make the English buy back the land we take. :willy_nilly:

 

That is a given...

 

Well 2.8 m Vietnamese , a million or so Arabs in Gulf War 1 alone, the population of 2 Japanese cities etc etcAll civillians who posed no threat -killed by Americans.

Its amazing how many Americans supported the IRA before the Oklahoma bomb.And they set up Al Qaeda -describing it as "freedom fighters vs the Communists".
So , to answer your question , lots of people talk like John.

 

Res', Al-Quaeda is/was orchestrated by yhe CIA as a word for the database of muj' fighters...anything further than that is crap...

 

Wrong.Cells werent just set up for Afghanistan , but Russia , the Balkans and elsewhere.All American finance , training , orchestration.
Hence American presidents hailing them as ahem "freedom fighters"
You might want to check out the charming people at the School of the Americas while youre at it.

The American Establishment has been nothing more than a gangster club for a very long time.And the worst part is the animals in certain parts of America baying for foreign blood at these circuses.
And yes , 19 th century Britain did a lot of shit too.

 

I find saying the people who happened to be in those towers and died deserved it all because of that landmasses governments decisions and actions incredibly infantile and yes, more than a bit disgusting. I wouldnt say such a thing about anyone, its senseless and shows a complete lack of respect for life
No-one on these forums knows the full and exact story. What we do know is the people who died and their families were not directly responsible for anything, yet they still died and their families still suffer the loss. Meanwhile twats feel it ok to go around saying it was well deserved. How sad, how low
These people have a whole separate issue, which i happen to share. It has nothing to do with the deaths of these human beings

 

No, "Al-Quaeda" is a word first used by the CIA in relation to this - "Al-Quaeda" means "database". A CIA "database" of muj' fighters, that they financed...that is the only connection the CIA have with the current incarnation of what we call "Al-Quaeda" as many of muj' they financed went onto be what we and they ("Al-Quaeda") ironicaly call "Al-Quaeda".

 

Perhaps everyone in Britain at the moment will be deserving of some major catastrophe because of this governments support of the Iraq invasion, eh

 

http://polidics.com/cia/top-ranking-cia-operatives-admit-al-qaeda-is-a-complete-fabrication.html

 

What rubbish.
The nature of terrorism is that it operates under cells.
There might be training camps but there's no "board of directors" of Al Qaeda.
Al Qaeda is akin to a "brand name" that various splintered groups use - and it was the American governments we can "thank" for the "skills" they learnt

BTW my sources include that "bastion of Communism" , Murdoch's Sunday Times.

Really , its very easy to find the facts , but I dont really want a "Google War" and be forced to read claptrap from so-called Neo-Conservatives.

VErseau , this isnt about who deserved this or not at all.
Thats not what the phrase "chickens coming home to roost means".

Its about a particularly cowardly mentality of certain people hiding behind power , technology and a media strangehold happy to kill millions for greed, then when a tiny fraction of that are killed for the first tiem ever on American soil , their "solution" is to kill a million more.

And a perfect example of this cowardice is the way many Americans ( not all , not even a majority)chnaged their tune on terrorism only when it happened to them.

Yes Tony Blair was a cancer too.But atleast most Britons werent baying for Arab blood.

 

Go find out out what "Al-Quaeda" means and go find out why the CIA used the term. No "google war" needed.
You are right:
Al Qaeda is akin to a "brand name" that various splintered groups use - and it was the American governments we can "thank" for the "skills" they learnt.
This does not mean the CIA or the American admin' have anything to do with the current activity related to "Al-Quaeda"...which is what you seem to be intimating.
Your "chickens coming home to roost means" comment is the most idiotic thing I have heard in a long time.