All at once.

thedope · Feb 8, 2010

Linear time is a mental construct, real time is always current. The past as well as the future are artifacts of the present.

famewalk · Feb 8, 2010

Meliai said:

time travel is theoretically possible, but not physically possible. the theory of relativity states that it is physically impossible for any matter to travel faster than the speed of light.

Has anyone done any reading on entanglement? I find this really, really fascinating. Entanglement is the act of one particle affecting another particle nonlocally. by nonlocally, i mean there is nothing physical connecting the two particles. They dont push on each other to affect each other. They are simply entangled with each other. When one moves clockwise in its position in space, the other also moves..not neccesarily clockwise, but it is affected by the movement of the first particle .its a really hard concept to explain and I am definitely not the person to explain it, but there is a ton of good reading on it out there, written by people with more expertise and verbal accuity than me. This isnt a theory, its something thats been observed.

What I find so fascinating about entanglement is what happens when you apply it to the theory of relativity. If two particles can affect each other nonlocally through space, they can also affect each other through TIME. What this basically says is that, instead of the 4 dimensional space-time of the theory of relativity, there is an infinite number of dimensions. Which means..there is no time. There are only dimensions that cannot be observed from the observers in this dimension. What we believe to be the past is merely happening in another dimension at the same time. All is eternal.

I freaking love this, it blows my mind.
Click to expand...

The idea of causality was reduced to facts against Facts for the World of individualized things which define themselves according to determinations. Negation made things spatial. Beyond the mere individuality there is counter-factual determination for the negative determination, here and there, worded event causes another event more to justify the relation by such definition than to explain how the law of nature deduced the event under observation for the prediction of more to discover.

Must we take it for granted that the universe existed according to one set of Laws of Nature in spite of predicting counter factually? If we fail to grant these laws we can discover time which was totally more than real for the next instant of the expected Future.

Too much.

thedope · Feb 8, 2010

famewalk said:

The idea of causality was reduced to facts against Facts for the World of individualized things which define themselves according to determinations. Negation made things spatial. Beyond the mere individuality there is counter-factual determination for the negative determination, here and there, worded event causes another event more to justify the relation by such definition than to explain how the law of nature deduced the event under observation for the prediction of more to discover.

Must we take it for granted that the universe existed according to one set of Laws of Nature in spite of predicting counter factually? If we fail to grant these laws we can discover time which was totally more than real for the next instant of the expected Future.

Too much.
Click to expand...

You edited because you wanted to be understood and is evidence of a synchronous empathy.

famewalk · Feb 8, 2010

Why ask why?

thedope · Feb 8, 2010

famewalk said:

Why ask why?
Click to expand...

Sure, but when asked the reason, you replied "not sure."

Log in or Sign up

All at once.

thedope glad attention Lifetime Supporter

famewalk Banned

thedope glad attention Lifetime Supporter

famewalk Banned

thedope glad attention Lifetime Supporter

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

All at once.

thedope glad attention Lifetime Supporter

famewalk Banned

thedope glad attention Lifetime Supporter

famewalk Banned

thedope glad attention Lifetime Supporter

Share This Page

Useful Searches