Alexandira Ocasio-Cortez is a result of Trump

Discussion in 'Politics' started by unfocusedanakin, Jan 6, 2019.

  1. 6-eyed shaman

    6-eyed shaman Ad-hominem receiver

    Oh yes indeed :rolleyes: the Nazis, Libertarians, and Lassiez-Faire economics are like peas in a pod. Because it's very well known that private property rights, freedom of speech, free markets, and the right to bear arms was totally in Hitler's platform.

    It's not like Nazi was an abreviation of "Nationalsozialist." No, that never happened, that's right wing propaganda. Ain't that right Beavis? :p
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2019
  2. eggsprog

    eggsprog liberalobamacommunist HipForums Supporter

    Yes, but Ugyur's denial doesn't result in his followers harrassing and threatening the families of the victims of the Armenian genocide...
    Okiefreak likes this.
  3. Okiefreak

    Okiefreak Senior Member

    Che was a racist early on, but he changed by the time he made a name for himself in leftist circles. He became a crusader for racial integration of public and higher education in Cuba, and "law 270" integrating public accommodations. He worked side by side with Afro-Cubans and Africans in the revolutionary struggle, and was a vocal opponent of apartheid in South Africa. If he were operating today, he might be expected to make a public apology and step down from revolutionary leadership, but that was then and this is now. If your right-winger racists mend their ways and start acting for the advancement of African-Americans, I'd be willing to say "All is forgiven"--at least on that issue. There's a huge disproportion between isolated cases of racism on the left, and the pervasive racism of white supremacists of the far right and the Euro-chauvinists and Islamaphobes of the AltLite, of which several of your posts would seem to be examples.

    There's another problem with bringing up Che that ties in with your overall strategy of conjuring up a monolithic "Left" and linking it to radical Socialism and Communism. Che was and is a hero to a fringe in this country. I see nothing admirable about him, and bringing him up in the context of contemporary U.S. politics and trying to link him to progressives is cheap propaganda.
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2019
    Asmodean and soulcompromise like this.
  4. Okiefreak

    Okiefreak Senior Member

    Hitler's opportunist use of the term "socialism" in his rise to power has been explained to you often enough. This article by David Emry explains it again in terms your might possibly understand. Were the Nazis Socialists?
  5. Meliai

    Meliai Evenstar

    The quality of whose healthcare?? Lol. Almost all European countries as well as Canada and Australia and Japan rank ahead of the US in healthcare.

    Anyways I agree the term socialism is divisive and should be avoided, but I don't come across many lefties who use the term...they usually nuance it as "democratic socialism." Or call it a mixed market economy. Or refer to the individual programs they're in favor of. It is usually rightie tighties like yourself who force the word socialism on everyone.
  6. 6-eyed shaman

    6-eyed shaman Ad-hominem receiver

    I remember when the left would scowl at dissidents for calling Barack Obama a socialist. Saying that it was a dishonest misrepresentation. Back then, socialism was a bad word.

    Now, they revel in using that word as they continue to misrepresent ALL countries with mixed economies and government controlled healthcare as socialist.
    If Obamacare in this country is so great, and public healthcare in all the rest of those countries is even better, how come politicians both here and abroad get to avoid it by getting top their own notch private healthcare plan?

    If a politician supports public healthcare, they should have to use it.

    If a politician wants to wage a foreign war, their kids should fight in it

    If a politician wants to disarm the public, they should fire the Secret Service

    Mice die in mousetraps because they don't understand why the cheese is free. This is socialism.
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2019
  7. Meliai

    Meliai Evenstar

    why are you still talking about socialism? We've already been over this

    You're incredibly disingenous and it's impossible to have a real discussion with you
  8. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    The woman is a total moron but being heavily promoted by the system to push the left even further to the left, and thus closer to all out NWO-style socialism/tyranny.

    Go figure: braindead millennials love her.

    Like, um.... totally!!
    6-eyed shaman and WritersPanic like this.
  9. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    And I totally agree that Trump is being used to make the left nuttier than they were to begin with. Trump creates an emotional response in people on both sides of the controlled paradigm, and thus the reason why he was allowed to become president. Divide and conquer. The man is a good actor, much like Bernie Sanders and all the other deceivers who have gotten rich off of conning the masses.
  10. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Ocasio-Cortez is merely a young, attractive Latina whom the system has glommed on to and are using as their puppet to push a truly draconian system of enslavement under the guise of cotton candy and pink bunny rabbits.
    WritersPanic likes this.
  11. Meliai

    Meliai Evenstar

    eggsprog and Okiefreak like this.
  12. Okiefreak

    Okiefreak Senior Member

    One more time: "the Left" is a construct, not a monolith. Fans of Barack Obama would balk at calling him a socialist because he wasn't one. Why milennials are enamored with the word "socialism" is a mystery to me. I suspect it's at least partly due to their high regard for Bernie Sanders, who likes to use the label. Possibly, there is some inter-generational rebellion going on in embracing one of their parents' bugbears. Probably also, it's because they experienced the failure of capitalism firsthand in the crash of 2008. Maybe they also were turned off by the spectacle of tea baggers and so-called "libertarians" intransigently opposing Obama at every turn and denouncing his "socialism" while the economy steadily improved. Or by the widening gap between rich and poor: in 2015, the top 1 percent of families in the United States made more than 25 times what families in the bottom 99 percent did. Or because they noticed the same folks who cry "socialism' also seem to spew racism, sexism, and homophobia. Why millennials are drawn to socialism

    The purpose of public healthcare is to enable even the poor and middle class to afford health coverage. In the United States, which has no single payer program but relies on public assistance for insurance coverage, private insurance provides better coverage. In countries with good single payer plans, people who can afford it may wish to go private to reduce the wait, or gain access to specialists outside the referral base of their GP. A politician can, in good conscience, support public healthcare while relying on private health insurance, in order to facilitate coverage for those who can't afford it. The "libertarian" alternative is to let those unable to afford it go without--a twenty-first century equivalent of "let them eat cake".
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2019
    Balbus likes this.
  13. 6-eyed shaman

    6-eyed shaman Ad-hominem receiver

    Because this is an AOC thread. She’s the poster child of 2019 socialism, is she not? So far her proposals have zilch to do with “mixed economics.”

    The Cult of Balbus likes to and push and push for socialism, and then when true examples of socialism come up, they backpedal into the mixed economy model.
  14. Okiefreak

    Okiefreak Senior Member

    The first statement seems fair enough, if there is a draft instead of a volunteer army. The second is obviously a non sequitor. Wanting to disarm the public wouldn't necessarily eliminate the need for the Secret Service, since it might not be effective in eliminating attacks by trained assassins and mental cases.

    Does this make any sense to you? Are you seriously suggesting that government programs are a deliberate trap to ensnare the public, who would be better off without schools, affordable health care, environmental regulation, social security, etc.? And that such programs--all characteristic of your vaunted "mixed economy" are (gasp) "Socialism"? What a load of horse pucky! Maybe people who post such nonsense should do without all public support, including unemployment assistance, and see how they get by.
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2019
  15. neonspectraltoast

    neonspectraltoast Best Member

    Why is it that all socialism seems to be is utilizing taxes wisely?
    Meliai likes this.
  16. Okiefreak

    Okiefreak Senior Member

    Technically, socialism involves either government ownership of the means of production and/or distribution in a society (as in the case of state socialism) or abolition of the state altogether (as in the case of anarchist socialism). The concept goes beyond utilization of taxes for welfare state benefits. Right wing pundits like to throw the term around loosely to include welfare programs or any public involvement in the economy, but that's just a propaganda ploy.
  17. Meliai

    Meliai Evenstar

    Dude...this is what i'm talking about. You are trying to conflate a mixed economy with socialism. You shouldnt have to be disingenuous to make an argument. If you cant make an honest point you seriously need to rethink your position.

    What example of socialism? Be specific. AOC's proposals have included medicare for all, investments in green energy, and a 70% marginal tax rate.

    Please indicate which proposal involves the government takeover of all private industry. I'll wait.
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2019
    Balbus, Tyrsonswood, Asmodean and 2 others like this.
  18. Flagme15

    Flagme15 Member

    Calling people socialists is the de rigueur ad hominem for people of a conservative bent.
    Why? Because they don't get it.
    McFuddy, Tyrsonswood and Okiefreak like this.
  19. unfocusedanakin

    unfocusedanakin The Archaic Revival Lifetime Supporter

    You share views with most of the conspiracy community. The threat is ALWAYS a left one. They never see their religious gun owning culture and the hate and division it brings as bad.
    For example the NRA types in the country are very open in preparing not for a war with the goverment but with people who do not support Trunmp. In other words not demo racy at all yet they would rather censor and dominate. They never see the mixing of goverment policy and region as a threat (yet seem to hate Sharia law which is the same idea).

    You don't see say for example Trump's desire to censor the press as NWO like? Of course not since it's "right wing". Instead you focus on high tax as some sort or Trojan horse. You really don't understand governments if you think suggesting 70% tax on earnings over 10 million and addressing global warming is a threat to society. Those two things are the main points of the Green New Deal. This tax means things like college are now more affordable. Hardly a threat.

    You have fallen for the ticks the elite play on you. They muddy the dentition of what "socialism" is so much eventually you fight to the bitter end over it when you have no idea what it means. In the end that system benefits them only. You literally can not comprehend a middle ground between trickle down ecomincs and lines for spoiled goverment cheese.
    Balbus likes this.
  20. tumbling.dice

    tumbling.dice I Am Only An Egg Lifetime Supporter HipForums Supporter

    70%? Jesus! Has she proposed a balanced budget and responsible government spending to go along with that? Because if not I'd rather just withdraw my own money and burn it.
    WritersPanic likes this.

Share This Page