And Millington TN is a hundred miles of cotton fields in every direction, but where they decided to teach idiots how to fly during WWII and where they still teach them how to fix airplanes. The marines they send to the California desert, because the land is even cheaper.
Actually before Roe v. Wade when abortion was illegal in America, the vast majority of illegal abortions were performed on white women, not black or Hispanic. Since the vast majority of abortion clinics are in black and ethnic neighborhoods, the black population in America should surge.
Mafia types always hate homosexuals, abortion, and mixing of the races because they already struggle to tell friend from foe.
White supremacists have identified phenotypes within the Caucasian family and believe that's all the diversity they need
One Mafia don was already caught trying to breed a super villain. Seriously, he sent women around to be artificially inseminated by geniuses. Such attempts are feeble at best right now, but the technology is becoming cheaper by the day. Already it is estimated to cost less than a million dollars to produce your own biological weapons in your basement and kill half the population. Once an academic asked me what can be done about all the looming disasters humanity now faces, and I told him to find out who is teaching these idiots how to kill each other and destroy the planet for fun and profit.
Haha. Everywhere I visit I'm like nup I've been there I know everything about it. Goes to Talladega Superspeedway for 3 days Knows everything about Alabama. I know, fuck me right?
I believe a middle ground can be found. The Alabama law is too strict in the no-abortions-no-excuses rules. But at the same time the late term abortion law in New York is also messed up in that a baby can be legally aborted up to the time of birth. Both states have fucked up laws in different ways.
Virginia has allowed people from NYC to buy a dozen guns at a gun show and sell them illegally in NY for decades. Its a lucrative business, and the idea that Virginia needs NYC for anything is a joke. The governor of Texas threatened to secede from the union, because there is never any love lost when politics are nothing more than the usual Mafia business. Virginia sterilized 20,000 teens for being poor white trash, and withheld their state employee retirement funds for over twenty years, offering to settle with them out of court for half of what they were owed. You can't sue the state of Virginia without their permission, but they let their former employees sue them and merely dragged it through the courts knowing half of them would be dead before the issue was settled. Americans insist on calling their government evil, and them complaining to their congressmen about Big Bird being an evil commie plot. Ironically, the Green party is the only party left in America if you consider cash to be political.
If you frame it like that, of course it sounds fucked up. If you had actually explained what the New York law really allows, not so much: So, a woman can choose to have an abortion up to 24 weeks. After that, she can still have an abortion, but only if a medical professional believes that the fetus will not be viable outside of the womb, or that there is a serious health risk for the woman if she carries the baby to term.
It's more that since you're a man, you'll never be personally affected by your opinion about abortion. It's a thought experiment to you. Sorta like your opinion on whether crucifixion is a good form of crime prevention, vs Jesus (fucking Christ that's a bad analogy to trans issues) opinion on crucifixion.
When I was in high school abortions were illegal in Pennsylvania, so all the girls just went to New York. The issue is, when does a women's body become two separate entities? At birth or before? I've always felt that as long as there is a physical connection between the zygote, embryo, etc. the women should have the last word as that is part of her body. But I'm not against setting a time limit on when abortions can be performed in some stage of development. But then we have to consider conjoined twins, as they too share the same body but we consider them to be separate beings. The problem is when is the "baby's" brain developed enough to consider it to be a separate consciousness? We could argue that that doesn't occur until after birth. The forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain, and the spinal cord don't develop until the seventh week of pregnancy. The cerebral cortex is relatively undeveloped even after birth. Many will argue that even if we consider that the fetus, etc. may not be a fully developed individual with a fully functioning brain and nervous system it has the potential to become one and so must be protected and granted the same rights as a baby who has been born. But this gets us into sticky legal issues such as can the mother be prosecuted for endangering the health of the fetus? If so where do we draw the line? Too much excess sugar in her diet? Use of teratogens? Maybe the mother spent too much time in a hot tub. Should cats be taken away from pregnant women as cats can transmit toxoplasmosis? And if a women and fetus do contract toxoplasmosis and she owns a cat can she then be prosecuted for endangering her fetus? Even if they don't develop toxoplasmosis isn't she endangering her unborn baby by owning a cat? Further if we consider that because a zygote or fetus has the potential to become an independent individual should we stop there? What about sperm and eggs, don't they also have the potential? Aren't they part of the man's and women's bodies also until they leave that humble abode? Should they also be regulated?
I agree. I lean toward Aristotle's view that the fetus isn't human until the point of "ensoulment", which in modern terms is when it's capable of sentience and cognition--i.e., has a brain and nervous system.
You guys do know no one is just killing 35 week fetuses willy nilly for the hell of it right...late term abortion is done out of medical neccessity only, and I think the term abortion is a bit of a misnomer in those cases
That, of course, requires further definition. Neural activity is detectable by EEG at 40 days, but "(n)o sustainable or complex nervous system is in place until approximately six months of gestation"--i.e., the second trimester. This roughly corresponds to the point of viability in Roe v. Wade analysis. "(I)t is clear that a human brain isn't viable until week 23, and only then with the aid of modern medical support..." 'The Ethical Brain'
pretty much .. the Pills that work in the first 8weeks. Most women know before this period. and induce period with chemicals./ Also Day After Pills. Best done in the first 4weeks but 8 is the latest I know of here.. This drug cost $500/600 and I think they only take cash. its not very pleasant either/ causes crazy rush of sweating, chills, and nausea .., doubtful there is anyway to make chemical/hormonal drugs illegal for those types of aborts.. As we all know anything can be purchased online .. and herbal aborts have been used for centuries..< not sure the success tho. But Ive heard Pineapple lots of its will cause miscarriages in early development.. Alabama Governor Signs Law To Effectively Ban Abortion In The State. What's Next?
That's where ethically it gets complicated. If the 35 week "fetus" is a human life by then, we get into "lifeboat ethics" debates": is it ever right to take the life of one human being to save the life of another? Saying that the act of birth confers human status seems hard to defend logically, but I do think there are hard cases where such choices might be justified. One case would be if both would die if the procedure weren't performed: I think it's an "open and shut" case if the answwer is yes, and I'd go by the judgment of medical professionals that this is the case. If it means sacrificing the baby to save the mother, it gets more difficult. One way or another, a human will die by decision or indecision. My own instincts are utilitarian: the mother has more extensive vested interests in a life the fetus isn't really aware of, and should be given preference on that basis. But what if the fetus is deformed, mentally defective, etc, and it would be burdensome for the mother or society to be stuck with it? That's where I'd draw the line, because it's opening the door to infanticide.