Let me get something straight in my head, riptide. Do you before the US and UK are going to be experiencing sharia law in the near or distant future?
See what I mean? Completely immune to logic and reason. When his assertions are shown to be wrong, he evades and pulls something else out of his ass. Riptide, you have no credibility in a serious discussion. Calling you names? Heh.. no one did that. Sigh..
I don't get what you mean? The UK sent him packing after a LONG process. It sounds as if you think US police officers came over and dragged him to the US. But yeah, I'm not quite sure what you mean. The Extradition Act 2003 (c.41) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which regulates extradition requests by and to the United Kingdom. The Act came into force on 1 January 2004. It transposed the European Arrest Warrant framework decision into British law and implemented the UK side of the controversial UK—US extradition treaty of 2003 before the treaty came into force in April 2007 after being ratified by the US Senate in 2006 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extradition_Act_2003 It has and does work both ways. Erm, NO :devil: Well, British Law in some form is evident in many different countries, isn't it? Kinda like the bedrock? Our law is the 'good' kind of law, though, right? A white culture tried that approx 70 years ago, and we fought them at the beaches etc etc etc (actually, not our beaches - but you get the idea). Apart from the love of guns, I agree with you.
Ok, you should reread your posts. You surely have made personal insults to people who simply have a more nuancated opinion about muslims than you. Perhaps you think that was humorous but that doesn't take away from the fact you have gotten personal. Yes, I in return got personal too. I have no problem admitting that. Why you are avoiding such things as well as simply dismiss critical questions from people just because they happen to live in another country also says a lot. But when you show signs of sincere conversation I maybe will try again :2thumbsup:
LOL. Yes, AT , I feel sharia is imminent in the UK........debatable still in US ; might be close. Yes, the bosnian muslim at Jax was threatening to bomb. From what I get his equipment was malfunctioning. Same as the Detroit bomber. OK , whats next?
Point being attacks are becoming more frequent. islamic aggression is starting to boil over. Just sayin. Westerners need to wake up. Might I reccommend reading some Nick Sennells or Pam Greer?
I don't think he had a bomb. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/01/jacksonville-airport-evacuated/2905233/ Edit: No cooberation but he was supposedly Muslim AND a Democrat. Good grief - double threat. http://aconservativeedge.wordpress....-hoax-erie-symptoms-of-a-security-evaluation/ Based on what?
We already know on what it was based: a false assumption regarding sharia and muslims. You may recommend anything of course but if you often choose to avoid real answers and repeating the same burka joke (that was not even funny the first time) is the general level of your posts you may also find you are not taken seriously. I hope you are aware you yourself are to blame for that then.
Personally , I feel your attitudes very culturally different ; hence my opine that europe will succumb before US.
Some people in this thread deserve to be on your bozo list, which is known as the Ignore List around here. Put them on your list, and you will never have to see their worthless opinions anymore. I did, and it helped my blood pressure.
He has no influence on my blood pressure whatsoever. You feel a lot. Actually europeans differ a lot in their opinions. They can differ just as extreme as peoples opinions on here. It shows again it is merely what you are focussing upon/take notice of. You seem to limit yourself in what you take notice of, as we have all been able to see clearly in this thread where it comes to your knowledge of sharia and islam/muslims. Your assumption was proven wrong but still you ramble on about your conclusions that are based on it.
I think you need to watch the video I posted with Tommy Robinson. He spent four years arguing this and that was imminent - then realised he needed a different approach. Nothing you have said is constructive, it seems. It's just based on a hatred of Islam/Muslims. Perhaps, like him, something is being lost in translation - I doubt that, though. Blind hatred is no better than the blind hatred some Muslims feel. Thankfully, there are more people that don't feel that way.
The article that goes along with the graph posted earlier. "Britain has invaded all but 22 countries in the world in its long and colourful history, new research has found." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/...-of-ten-countries-so-look-out-Luxembourg.html
Just wondering if measuring penis size lowers blood pressure. Ignore list. LOL. Go measure some more dix.
Thanks for clearing that up :2thumbsup: I still don't see how it really fits here, even if you'd wanna seriously drag karma into it. If it is ment to be connected to the anger of certain arab people because of unwanted western interference in their country the U.S. is just as likely to be a target of extremism (and it seems to be).
Asmodean I think the original point was meant to be about migration. People migrating to the UK. The map was supposed to show where GB had been. Rather than 'invaded' (an extremely loose term for some of the countries). If 'we've' been 'there' then why shouldn't 'they' come here... The point you raise 'anger of certain arab people because of unwanted western interference in their country the U.S.' is a little hypocritical when you consider who orchestrates terrorism and where terrorism occurs.