9/11

Ho hum, another VG lie.

 

This youtube video is evidence of the vaporization of what is left after the giant hog dog slammed into the south tower. the only possible conclusion is the giant hog dog did in fact not bring down the south tower, but that the CIA set off explosive marmite

 

What
Is
This
Word

 

According to the physics of the official account, if you drop a bowling ball on the Earth, the entire Earth should crumble into dust.

 

According to the physics of the official account, if you drop a bowling ball on the Earth, the entire Earth should crumble into dust.

 

Ole Mr. Gage kinda got his ass kicked by this guy, Dave Thomas, a physicist. Gage also got caughtcherry picking evidence to make himself look good.

How I Debated a 9/11 Truther and Survived - CSI

 

I know the Alex Jones Radio show is a dubious source but:

Retired Army Col. Donn de Grand-Pre did say “Flight 93 was taken out by the North Dakota Air National Guard. I know the pilot who fired those two missiles to take down Flight 93." “The pilot was Major Rick Gibney who fired two Sidewinder missiles at the aircraft and destroyed it in midflight at precisely 0958."

 

The learned man's way of calling someone a pussy, I think.

 

Debunked: AE911Truth's WTC7 Explosive Demolition Hypothesis

FAQs - NIST WTC 7 Investigation

IF RICHARD GAGE WAS SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH

 

Ok, i had a tricky time finding it the last couple days, as its been a while. thanks RH, it was on one of Mick Wests sites

But this is Richard Gages (the ass911truth.org guy) dumbass explanation for why it could have only been a controlled demolition. the infamous cardboard box demo



What a laugh, what a dumbass

You have to wonder though, i think about 11 years later, why the hell the University of Alaska F would want any association with this guy

 

Professor Hulsey took on a scientific study that has revealed for us, unequivocally, controlled demolitions in WTCs 1, 2 and 7. He did the science, rigorously, unlike NIST who have been caught in their numerous outright lies, their fraudulent science which illustrates fully, unequivocally, controlled demolitions in WTCs 1, 2 and 7.

You have to wonder just how dumb USGOCT conspiracy theorists are. They present the exact scenario that occurred for the destruction of WTC1.

Even with this perfect example from AE911Truth, "WTC1 for USGOCT Dummies", they pretend they don't understand.

Oh so typical of USGOCT conspiracy theorists lack of logic and ability to present anything meaningful. Richard Gage described the fall of WTC1 perfectly.

All of a sudden, in the blink of an eye, 80,000 tonnes of stone cold, much stronger steel on the lower floors had all the resistance of custard pudding.

===========

Gordon Ross [Professional Engineer]

1. If the upper storeys were suddenly allowed to fall through a vacuum of the same depth of the tower height, they would reach bottom in about 9.5 seconds. [Richard Gage's 15 storey block with nothing below it.]

2. If allowed to fall through a vat of custard of the same height they would take about 20 seconds to cover the same distance.

3. The largest estimate of collapse duration that I have found is about 16 seconds. Although this estimate does not bear examination, we can use it to say that the resistance offered by the steel structure below the collapse front lies somewhere between absolutely nothing and custard.

[bolded is mine]

4. What is the official explanation for the sudden and complete transformation of hundreds of thousands of tonnes of steel to a state which does not even rival confectionery?
-- Gordon Ross

There is no official explanation "for the sudden and complete transformation of hundreds of thousands of tonnes of steel to a state which does not even rival confectionery". NIST did no study to try to determine that.

WTC7 was a controlled demolition, as confirmed by NIST and the U of A Fairbanks study. NIST admitted free fall, which can only occur with a controlled demolition.

When we all know that WTC7 was a controlled demolition, it is clear that the twin towers suffered the same fate. The US nanothermite tells us, unequivocally, controlled demolitions in WTCs 1, 2 and 7.

The molten/vaporized WTC structural steel tells us, unequivocally, controlled demolitions in WTCs 1, 2 and 7.

The molten molybdenum tells us, unequivocally, controlled demolitions in WTCs 1, 2 and 7.

The vaporized lead, 3,180F tells us, unequivocally, controlled demolitions in WTCs 1, 2 and 7.

The fact that there is no evidence for alleged hijackers tells us, unequivocally, controlled demolitions in WTCs 1, 2 and 7.

The fact that "a typical false American hero", Todd Beamer's cell phone, the one he was allegedly on on UA93, made numerous calls from New Jersey after UA93 crashed tells us, unequivocally, controlled demolitions in WTCs 1, 2 and 7.

The fact that Todd Beamer's cell phone stayed connected for 13 to 15 minutes after the alleged crash of UA93 tells us, unequivocally, controlled demolitions in WTCs 1, 2 and 7.

There are volumes and volumes more of irrefutable evidence that shows us, unequivocally, controlled demolitions in WTCs 1, 2 and 7.

All VG has got is his pathetic ridiculing of over 3,000 architects and engineers. He has provided zilch in the way of evidence, zilch in the way of rational discussion. Why is it always that USGOCT conspiracy theorists can't provide any evidence or even rational argument for their slam dunk nonsense?

Why is it, VG, that none of you wacky conspiracy theorists can provide one speck of evidence for the USGOCT?

With all this EVIDENCE, and absolutely none from Vanilla Gorilla, or any other USG conspiracy theorists, it's easy to see who are the dumb asses. They all keep waving their arms and screaming, "Look at us dumb asses, we can't provide any evidence for our goofy fable but just trust us".

 

Brilliant description, scratcho, of Vanilla Gorilla and the other brainiacs, a "Plethora of pusillanimous posturing" folks, who can't provide a lick of evidence for the USGOCT!!

 

He was talking about you genius.

 

The typical juvenile response of a USGOCT conspiracy theorist. And RetiredHippie, Running Horse and GLENGLEN like this.

Still no evidence from any of the "rocket scientists".

 

Good lord, and people want to be associated with that moron. Stupidest thing I ever saw other than a camlok post.

 

How do you not look at that video, and at very least think to yourself i should find a smarter truther to follow?

 

Just let Mick West do it for us

Joe Rogan runs metabunk which is broader, Mick West has websites were he eloquently debunks ass911truth.org

Anyone can google these two, your efforts in the past week camlok have educated people here about Mick West

Here Mick West talks about the 97% of architects ate the AIA that voted against a re-opening of any case around wtc 7

 

West and Rogan explain WTC 7

 

Edward Current explains how WTC 7 collapsed (no crazy thermite bullshit)

 

Edward Current explains the correct applications of potential energy and real world conservation of momentum