9/11

Your evidence just gets better and better, Vanilla Gorilla!!!! Go ape!

 

Duh uh uh uh

I'm always going to edit out the first 8 seconds of the video of the WTC 7 collapse and post it on my truther website so no one ever finds out it didnt fuckin freefall

Duh uh uh uh uh

 

Knock yourself out, VG. Go ape!

 

Post #436 in this thread is where the tone was set. And it wasn't camlok who initiated it. It was runninghorse.

And post #458 advanced that tone in no uncertain terms. So . . . yeah.

And then there's post #464.

But camlok isn't complaining, and neither am I. So why are you? It should be apparent that we can handle belligerence just fine in a tit-for-tat way.

 

That is a totally dumb statement you made. First dumb statement - "your theories".

The science/evidence is crystal clear that there were no hijackers. The science is crystal clear in pointing out that people who can't grasp these simple science ideas are indeed, dumb as a sack of hoe handles.

BUT they are not my theories. They are the established science of the day, backed up by experiment - the arbitrator of science.

And these folks are worse than dumb, they defend something so evil because they know what they are doing. They aren't silent death camp guards, they are bragging, joyously celebrating the murders death camp guards.

How have you managed to miss that there has not been one piece of evidence that supports the USGOCT?

How have you managed to miss that there has been voluminous evidence that shows the USGOCT is 100% false? Molten steel, US government nanothermite, free fall of WTC7 which means controlled demolition, ...

Why would any sane, rational person think it bad to expose a murderous US government/governments that will kill their own?

Why would any sane, rational person think it bad to follow the tenets of science in order to do that?

Excuse me, but this is an exceedingly dumb, stupid, crazy position that you have taken. It is also terribly hypocritical because you focus on me and forget to address this to all those who have disparaged me and others who hold this impeachable position.

No, it hasn't, not in any sane, rational manner. Neither has storch's points been addressed in any sane, rational manner.

For you to suggest this is utter nonsense, total drivel.

You can always just go bowling, scratcho.

 

Duh uh uh uh uh

And after I edit out the first 8 seconds of the video of the WTC 7 collapsing and post it on my truther website so nobody ever finds out it didnt freefall, I'm going to blow $316 grand to pay some nobody at an Alaskan University to try make it look like a controlled demoltion when someone way smarter than him has already shown how the building collapsed, then get butthurt because no one is interested in alaskan guys paid-by-truthers fake version

Duh uh uh uh uh

 

Apparently you want to give the people who set the tone here in the first place a free pass. What kind of a motherfucker does that make you?

What exactly is your reason for being in this thread. If you really believe that camlok has crossed some line, then report the offending post. Don't go playing moderator.

 

Now it's obvious that no one disagrees with the statement that when a moving body collides with a body of the same composition, two things happen. The moving body is slowed down, and the stationary body is moved. Therefore, that point stands.

The next question is, how is it that the upper block of the North Tower fell through the intact core structure below for the first 360 feet at a rate just 40 feet shy of freefall?

 

The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about. - Wayne Dyer

You make a phony post pretending to care about manners and decorum and in that post and this one of yours too, you reveal what a hypocrite you are. You are using the "manners" meme in a futile attempt to cover up your own dishonesty and ignorance [ignorance can be both naive and willful].

Notice the part in bold of yours, scratcho?

 

This is an internet forum. It's where discussions take place. If you have nothing to add to the discussion, then shut up.

 

Now it's obvious that no one disagrees with the statement that when a moving body collides with a body of the same composition, two things happen. The moving body is slowed down, and the stationary body is moved. Therefore, that point stands.

The next question is, how is it that the upper block of the North Tower fell through the intact core structure below for the first 360 feet at a rate just 40 feet shy of freefall?

Anyone have an answer to that?

 

He did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

 

So why are you attempting to cover up an evil of this magnitude? Your words, above, since you made an entry, ring false, they scream "fabricator of mythic proportions".

But you can change. Looking at the science in an honest, rational fashion will do wonders for you in that regard.

 

Now it's obvious that no one disagrees with the statement that when a moving body collides with a body of the same composition, two things happen. The moving body is slowed down, and the stationary body is moved. Therefore, that point stands.

The next question is, how is it that the upper block of the North Tower fell through the intact core structure below for the first 360 feet at a rate just 40 feet shy of freefall?

Anyone have an answer to that?

 

Then it's off to bowling, I guess, eh, S?

 

Another zero evidence USGOCT conspiracy theorist pops up, with, guess what, no evidence.

 

Um, how did I become a conspiracy theorist? The government didn’t take down the buildings, terrorists did. As far as proof goes, I watched it, I saw it happen. I watched the first tower tip to the left then fall from the top, not the bottom like all demolitions do. BTW, has anyone told you your adorable when you act like a pissy little girl.

 

You say that you don't like true believers, S, but what are you and all the others who believed and now just pretend to believe in the USGOCT, a fable that was so phantasmagorically impossible right from day 1.

If there really was this terrorist group out there that could pull off the USGOCT, then they would be doing one a week.

And you wonder why some folks consider those people that believe the USGOCT and those that pretend to believe the USGOCT are dumb/ignorant/gullible/naive/... .

 

You don't even know that all demolitions do not start at the bottom. You're really just half-assing your way through this, aren't you? Have a look, and try not to forget it.



And how soon you forget this:

Now it's obvious that no one disagrees with the statement that when a moving body collides with a body of the same composition, two things happen. The moving body is slowed down, and the stationary body is moved. Therefore, that point stands.

The next question is, how is it that the upper block of the North Tower fell through the intact core structure below for the first 360 feet at a rate just 40 feet shy of freefall?

You've answered the first part earlier in the thread. Now all you have to do is answer the second question. Then we can move on.

 

Cam, hippie's only purpose in this thread is to start a firefight so that the uncomfortable questions can fall by the wayside.