9/11

No, 3000 that signed the petition.

Rough guess, at least 600,000 architects and structural engineers worldwide.

So at best, you have 0.5% signed the petition, although mire likely every truther got their mum to sign the petition.

Still at 0.5% that represents the dopiest 0.5%

 

Finishing up his study that illustrates clearly that NIST lied from the get go and continued to lie to the end, even when they were caught in their lies. The lies you make a grand pretense of believing but you can't defend anything about your USGOCT.

You know that if you try to defend the USGOCT you would fail instantly because, there is NO evidence to support the USGOCT. None of you, who are obviously liars of immense proportion, have ever provided any evidence. Which reveals that you are all incredibly dishonest people. Honest people provide evidence for their ideas.

Have you found any academics/academic papers that dispute his findings?

Have you found any academics/academic papers that dispute the findings of AE911Truth?

 

You lie and you are desperately uninformed.

You can't name one professional of anything who supports the USGOCT.

“The manner of free-fall collapse of all the structures required removal of all structural support and the horizontal expelled matter required an introduced horizontal force.”
— Frankie Lee, P.E., engineering consultant with over 30 years of experience on construction-related projects and 20 years of working as a civil engineer.

“The official version of the events of 9/11 never made sense to me but, for some reason, I chose to ignore or dismiss my suspicions for 16 years. I am ready now to throw my weight behind the call for a new investigation.”
— Kevin Giambrone, P.E., structural engineer with expertise in bridges.

 

Study was already completed months ago. No one was ever going to take it seriously, no major news network was ever going to touch it

 

Yes, but why such a shitty university? Why not get the study done at MIT?

 

Again, I point out your lies, which you know to be lies/your uninformed opinions

“It is my professional opinion as an engineer with over 20 years of experience and a US Army officer combat engineer trained in explosives that the narrative put forth by the mainstream media is egregiously in error. The destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 was not as a result of aircraft impacts. The destruction and lives lost are the result of carefully placed demolitions. The truth needs to be disclosed to the public and those responsible for its destruction have a lot to answer for.”
— Jason Rice, P.E., structural engineer with over 20 years of experience as the engineer of record for various civil, commercial, and institutional projects.

 

Yeah, one of the dopey 0.5%

 

“The NIST model [of WTC 7] does not represent the reality of the collapse. Therefore, NIST model assumptions were wrong somewhere. In addition to that, the collapse of one major column would not cause the whole building to collapse, and if it did, it will not collapse symmetrically.”
— Amin Talha, architect with 30 years of experience managing the construction of institutional, commercial, and residential high-rise buildings and single-family dwellings.

 

I count 4 so far out of 3000

Please give me the names of the other 2996

Oh, 2996, what a co-incidence

 

You continue to reveal yourself as the dopey one, the dopey one who knows the truth but still lies. What you have been exhibiting here is a whole new measure of evil.

“Real investigations by the National Transportation Safety Board, Chemical Safety Board, etc., are thorough and to the highest ethical and professional standards — using all available evidence to arrive at logical, science-based conclusions. This type of investigation has yet to occur for the events of 9/11. The current dubious conclusions of the 9/11 investigation require cherry-picked evidence, a secret model that is off limits to peer review, and exclusion of contradictory evidence. The process used was anything but scientific.”
— Daniel Lambesis, chemical engineer with over 30 years of experience in the chemical industry.

 

Lol, i think he is going to list the other 2995

 

Yeah, this is the point that people who defend the official narrative can't dismiss and won't address because the physics is in their face in the form of video record.

 

Duh uh uh uh

Uh Newtons third law means stuff can never fall down

Duh uh uh uh

 

Whoopee, you can count to four but you can't discuss the science of 9/11, you can't provide any evidence for the USGOCT. You have nothing, zilch. Your entire time here is only deception, willful lies
... .

No evidence, no science professionals, no one with any credence whatsoever supporting the USGOCT, just NIST, whose lies and scientific fraud have been exposed for the whole world to see.

 

Your best evidence to date, Vanilla Gorilla!!!! Go ape!

 

Highly indicative of your deep dedication to your crystal ball kind of science, Vanilla Gorilla.

 

That's incorrect.

Golly, this reminds me that you've arbitrarily decided that the only thing holding up the core was the perimeter columns. How did you arrive at that conclusion?

 

Duh uh uh uh

I saw a youtube video of United 175 at an angle where it goes under a shadow before it hits the south tower

Duh uh uh uh

That can only possibly mean it was a military grade flying hotdog

Duh uh uh uh

 

Have you seen this:



But first:

You did arbitrarily decide that the only thing holding up the core was the perimeter columns. How did you arrive at that conclusion?

 

The pertinent departments of MIT and all the other major US universities have all been invited to send someone supportive of the USGOCT to debate for the USGOCT. No one wants to because they all know the government story is a huge lie.