2020 Election

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Deleted member 42017, Jan 1, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. r0llinstoned

    r0llinstoned Gute Nacht, süßer Prinz

    Messages:
    13,234
    Likes Received:
    2,187
    20/20 vision
     
  2. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,589

    Thats Buble isnt it? How on earth did he not think he should never get photographed eating something phalic that way?
     
    WritersPanic likes this.
  3. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,589

    Well, could you please copy and paste here how that $52 trillion is going to be funded?

    Rather than one of you posting a link that doesnt actaully explain it saying the link explains it, learn to read
     
  4. Irminsul

    Irminsul Valkyrie

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    198
    The disappointing thing is, Nobody dipped the corn dog into sauce.
     
    WritersPanic likes this.
  5. deleted

    deleted Visitor

    [​IMG]

    get to the chopp'a ..
     
  6. Meliai

    Meliai Members

    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    5

    It's on her campaign website in detail
    Also explains that where she's drawing her numbers from estimates 52 trillion in costs under our current system with millions of people not being covered, versus just under 52 trillion in costs by transitioning to a single payer with 100% of the population being covered.

    Sanders plan says the same thing but the estimates are much lower...32 trillion single payer with 100% of coverage, over 32 trillion for the current system with coverage gaps

    Either way single payer is cheaper. Compare the US to other healthcare systems and its blindingly obvious single payer is cheaper.

    Bit rich for an aussie who has a single payer system to argue against a single payer system, your country pays for it just fine.
     
    scratcho and Okiefreak like this.
  7. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,589
    Errr....thats like $158,000 per capita
     
  8. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,589
    I didnt see this part, not saying you shouldnt have it eventually. But in one hit? Jeesus
     
  9. hotwater

    hotwater Senior Member Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    50,596
    Likes Received:
    39,006
     
  10. Meliai

    Meliai Members

    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    5
    I dont know what Warren's transition plan, I didnt read that far, but I doubt it's one hit

    Sanders plan transitions over 4 years with assistance and retraining provided to those working in the insurance industry

    The trillions of dollars is the estimate over years, not in one year. Sanders 32 trillion estimate is over a decade and we're predicted to spend more than that already without making any changes
     
    MeAgain likes this.
  11. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,589
    Well, last budget, Medicare and Medicaid was just over 1 trillion
     
  12. Meliai

    Meliai Members

    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    5
    Right, the cost estimate of our current system is factoring in insurance costs/out of pocket costs for the uninsured/unpaid hospital bills/prescription drug costs and all that fun stuff too.
     
  13. Meliai

    Meliai Members

    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    5
    To give you an idea of how the US system works....

    My work offers a couple of different insurance plans that range in price depending on the coverage, deductible, whether or not your spouse and kids are on it, etc.
    So let's just say I wanted a low deductible plan that covered my spouse and child.
    It would cost $500 a pay period, $1000 a month, $12k a year.
    Or the other option , which I have, is the monthly premiums are much lower but if I ever need to be hospitalized I'll be stuck with a huge deductible to pay before my insurance pays a dime.
    And that's employee sponsored healthcare, meaning my employer pays a portion. Insurance bought on the exchange tends to either be absurdly expensive or it doesnt cover anything. And it isnt subsidized unless you make below a certain amount.

    So the cost estimate takes all that into account
    Not to mention the poor uninsured souls who end up with 200k hospital bills and have to file bankruptcy so taxpayers end up eating those costs anyways
     
  14. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,589
    Ok, and who is going to pay for it?
     
  15. Vladimir Illich

    Vladimir Illich Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    12,458
    Likes Received:
    10,052

    Donald Trump ???
     
  16. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    15,085
    My wife currently pays $1,000 a month, that's $12,000 per year just for her, one person, without vision or dental...if she never uses her insurance.
    That's with a $2,000 a year deducible, which means she has to pay the first $2,000.00 if she uses it which raises the cost to $14,000 per year if she uses it before it begins to pay. She can pay up to $8,150.00 per year in out of pocket expenses.

    That raises it to a possible cost of $22,150.00 per year, depending on what healthcare she might need.

    In addition a doctor visit costs her $60.00 per visit in network, a specialist costs her $80.00 per visit in network, she has a $2,000.00 deducible per year for drugs and she has a copay on drugs from $20.00 to 100% per prescription, which means she pays the first $20.00 or all of it depending on the drug.

    At the beginning of the new year her cost goes up $42.00 per month or $504.00 per year.
    That will leave her with about $7.00 per month from her social security check.

    This is the cheapest plan we could find for her. Private insurance of course.

    Luckily she turns 65 in March and can go on Medicare and my supplement insurance, which will save her about $7,000 per year and no deducible or out of pocket expense, lower per doctor copay, better drug coverage, and a dental and vision plan.

    We can't wait for that government plan!
     
    Meliai likes this.
  17. Meliai

    Meliai Members

    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    5
    Who pays for it in Australia?
     
    Okiefreak likes this.
  18. You have to wait until it passes to find out what's in it!
     
  19. Vanilla Gorilla

    Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

    Messages:
    30,289
    Likes Received:
    8,589
    Well it doesnt cost us $158,000 per person
     
  20. Meliai

    Meliai Members

    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    5
    But the thing you have to understand about the US healthcare system is costs are exorbitantly expensive compared to other countries due to administrative costs within the insurance industry as well as, obviously, the profit motivation.
    Costs would naturally fall after a while on a single payer system and our per capita costs would eventually even out to be more on par with other countries. The transition period would be expensive but worth it in the long run as eventually costs would level out.

    Anyways both Warren and Sanders have outlined where the taxes would come from, just go to their respective websites.
    You have to keep in mind too insurance is employer subsidized at the moment. So taxing employers for single payer isn't going to place more of a burden on them than our current insurance system does.
    And the middle class could easily withstand a 5% tax hike (which is Sanders' estimate) because we wont be paying insurance premiums and deductibles and copays. Most people probably pay more than 5% of their income into healthcare right now so they'll save money.
    They've both floated the idea of taxing stock market speculation. And of course the wealthiest Americans would be taxed.
    The tax base is there and the US would save money in the long run. In the immediate actually, the studies both Warren and Sanders are drawing their numbers from show us saving money immediately
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2019
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice