The Mayan Calendar marks a Cosmic Shift of World Ages in 2012. Their calendar was more accurate than a lot of Westerners would like to give it credit for and it was based on cosmic principles which is why it can predict eclipses far into the future onto the spot which has been verified by archaeologists.
Turns out the Mayans did make amendments to their Calendar afterall, despite what I believe guerillabedlam speculated that Science does do this but the Mayans didn't. I can post sources if needed.
the informity is not uniform obviously; three threads of pouring water into a full cup in this forum alone. The information must be statistically distributed.
the statistic made of information every bit itself informed and relatively informed bit by bit. There is no absence, of knowledge, knowledge always being shared. The relatively informed is in no way uninformed but fully informed of it's relations.
This forum alone? Bit by bit it goes out to the airwaves and this is a sunami. Saying The kingdom of knowledge is like the tiniest of seeds that grows into the largest of shrubs so that the birds, tweets of the air, waves come to maketheir nests in the shade of it's branches. This is exactly as described.
To speak of no distortion, i.e. something is not right, but look for the right thing in every tiniest corner of your experience. There is no reason in suspecting reality but every reason to suspect suspicion.
Will clarify the world for you to the extent that it seems like you know everything in comparison to what has only been suspected, but no one stops becoming, stops becoming informed an therefor in grasp of ever greater proportion. We journey right now beyond our own system for the first time and we bring light with us to every where. We are the seed from the furnace of all that is visible, all that can be touched and all that, can be apprehended. We have the capabilty to master our experience in this very moment and the only thing that can slow you down is try to accommodate the past. The past is not here, if you entertain it, it will not pass away. Lot's wife looked back and turned into stone, the dusty past of cosmic collisions and it is a long way back into the light.
Aren't we constantly invoking the past in order to better understand the present? Though I understand that the past in the past does not exist as such; we think here and now about what we categorize as "past"
We refer to our memory and mistakenly invoke it a past. We are an unbroken chain of information at large. The past is not an element distinct from memory and your memory is intact in terms of biological experience, even though conscious communication might be impossible because of equipment failure. Since sentient life is a chain it must be linked somewhere and the link is thoughts about and perception of, the thought comes first, we breath in and then exhale and there is a slack space, tide, between those two and around those two. One in and out movement constitutes one breath and in the space between we can observe the sensation that follows. and in the next breath respond or react to that situation. Or you can learn the ins and outs of your sensational being and be sensational instead. I observe the sensation that follows each directional change to I have two opportunities to to discern in a single breath. Inhale sustain, exhale hold, inhale sustain, exhale hold. If you breathing at a rate of lets say 10 breaths an hour that is an extended time of possibility for observation of each effect. Breathing has been my lifelong tool of access to essential function being our most essential function. i am aware of every breath and can keep that attention in the midst of a lot of personal activity. You can also produce exotic effects through how you hold your tongue, body postures and whether you are breathing through mouth or nose and at what rhythm.
We see the effect of the previous breath and upon that effect calculate our next inflection, however this does not happen is you are simply following a chain of associations in your memory which invariably happens when you aren't focused on what you are trying to perceive bur rather thinking about how you are going to respond or counter with a particular bit of information somewhere in the body of the other persons statement long before that speaker quit speaking, so after that switch in attention to the internal process from incoming information nothing is sufficiently regarded to make legitimate sense out of what the person is saying. So you have discussions where people speak past one another and never connect in common stream of attention. The lack of significant communication is palpable every where as people walk about content to have opinions as opposed to understanding. There is a lack of attention to significant detail and therefor a distorted sense of the details.
There might be the impression that this kind of sustained focused attention is difficult to achieve but that is not at all the case. Genuine interest makes the task easy, it is the other things you think you might want that distracts you. Unfocused attention invariably becomes boring and tedious and that is why you turn on the tv to take the place of your conscious determinations, to fill it with abstract proportions.