2012

and also, Skip, what is it that bothers you about a giant thought being "God's" thought? God is just a word. You can call something like a universal mind God but you don't have to. It just has a lot of religious allegory around it and that's why it bugs you but it's simply a word.

 

I was going to and am going to ignore this thread because you were becoming obnoxious and it became a run around of you just deflecting my arguments without addressing them. I also had to tend to this thing called work...

I'll respond to the abstract you posted though, interesting stuff. If a legitimate institution replicated the study, I'd be more convinced but their methods seem fairly sound. Although here is info about the particular institute that did the study...

Most of their funding came from organizations with similar types of goals as well.

 

cool...I'm tending to this thing called the Great Work over here. The fact is is that Science is studying some of the phenomena I have laid out and will continue even moreso in the near future. The reason I have been obnoxious and a dick is because you're doing the runaround now as well. You've been calling all my ideas nonsense that's eaten up by dumbass idiots so don't expect me to not have an attitude. The moment I provide a peer-review there's zero response from anyone. Whatevs.

 

I guess the thing is for me is.. why does it matter? The closest to knowing you can ever be is your own subjective experience.. nurture that and let it be testament to itself. Getting in a hissy cos nobody replied within 4 hours taints your whole argument for me and shows no real evidence for cosmic evolution besides lots of writing on a screen.

Here's a short story I read yesterday, it was in a newsletter from the only decent art teacher I ever had.

 

It was more than 4 hours. I first posted it at 9 something last night and still haven't really gotten a response about it. I was never throwing a hissy fit. Just stating the facts that my ideas have been shrugged off as mumbo jumbo and the moment I get Scientific about it and boom they have nothing more to say. It wasn't me who had a negative attitude going in to this whole thing. I'm not the one who's been blaming others' ideas as meaningless nonsense. This thread is a testament to all the intuitions that I've had. And so I'm recording all of it on to here. No reason to try to turn this around on me. Just accept that I've been correct about plenty that I've said. I've had a positive attitude about these ideas and lots of others have not.

 

I will leave you all with this. Goodbye for now. When I return I will have more data in relation to previous claims that I have made. This is the scientific method is it not? Hypotheses throughout these pages and then the testing and then the results. I would say I've been doing pretty good so far.

http://www.2012-spiritual-growth-prophecies.com/great-cycle.html

 

http://www.philipcoppens.com/2012_art1.html

 

Ah ok yeah, I missed the AM PM thing, but that wasn't my point, I was just using a highlighter. The annotations came just after that.

 

Anyone else notice the end of the world conspiracies sorta died down after 2012? 1999,2000, a bunch of other ones... The 2012 was the epitome of this and when it didn't happen it's like people just kinda... stopped

 

Just wait for the next one...

 

I have 3 jobs, a girlfriend, and no car. I'm sorry that I can't keep up with you here, but I will reply now. Don't get all up in yourself because you are neck deep in this thread while the rest of us are only slightly amused at your efforts to convince us of these things. Don't think for a second we are struck silent by some profound evidence that has rocked our worldview, I'm sorry to say.

Regarding this article: http://www.kundalini-yoga-lausanne.com/download/Shannahoff-Khalsa%20Kundalini%20Yoga%20and%20Psychiatric%20Disorders.pdf

Did you actually read it? It's about how meditation helps with OCD and other psychiatric disorders. This has absolutely nothing to do with kundalini, other than that it's called "kundalini meditation". You can remove all aspects of kundalini from these techniques and they will still display the exact same mechanisms of improvement. When I asked for a scientific paper about kundalini, I meant a paper where a physicist or a biologist or a doctor discover proof that kundalini energy is real, chakras actually exist, etc. No such papers exist, I'll save you the trouble of trying to find them. If such a thing were discovered it would rock the foundation of the world and of countless areas of science; it would completely upheave the entire medical and pharmaceutical industry, and there would be worldwide histeria as abrahamic religions, which do not subscribe to hindu beliefs, reject this, probably with lots of violence. It would be front page on every newspaper in the world.

The second link about mayan calendars:

Ok, so they got some things right, but other things are still just tribal superstitions. Not really impressed. Statistically anybody who details centuries of astronomical activities is bound to get something right; in fact if they were really that great with their calendar, there should be much more that was right.

Also, no, you are still not employing the scientific method, and that is because of your lack of education in fields such as statistics, physics, astronomy, anthropology, psychology, sociology, etc. You think you are but you're not.

Carl Sagan, "The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark" 1996

 

believe in your own dreams for no one else can dream them..

 

Mr. Writer did you read the peer review journal of the studies on how consciousness may create reality that I posted above? You seemed to have overlooked that entire part. And that will end up being very connected to Kundalini. Science just isn't quite there yet, due to its modern arrogance and ignorance. But it's getting damn close. Kundalini is not a myth and it will be a scientific reality sooner than you think.

It's hilarious to me how much you doubt this. We're already getting to studies on the pineal gland and DMT. If you really think that Kundalini won't soon be a scientific fact then you are in for a sad awakening, my friend.

And yet here's another article on the changing shift we are currently undergoing in the world...which points towards a post-2012 Counterculture just as I have been saying. http://kosmosjournal.org/article/connecting-for-change-insights-from-an-emerging-global-transformation-movement/

And let me post the peer-reviewed science study on Consciousness one more time. Believe me, this will eventually all lead to Kundalini. It's evolution. Very funny how you chose to overlook the science that I did post. As if science is the answer to everything anyway. But here you go. http://media.noetic.org/uploads/files/PhysicsEssays-Radin-DoubleSlit-2012.pdf ...Yes, the research is only in the baby stages but it's only 2014. That's like year 2 from the Long Count's perspective.

Or let's take a look at this...something called THE EMERGING SCIENCES FOUNDATION...in regards to Kundalini...https://www.emergingsciences.org/spiritual-awakening-and-the-kundalini-database-project/?gclid=CjwKEAiAv7ajBRCIldS7rp7wzFkSJAAA1n4DI7enf3FI%2yItEZtaz3RC8EeQjoHXrqthax8lurW9BoCjnLw_wcB


here are some other links:

http://www.kundaliniresearchinstitute.org

http://icrcanada.org
-"...a discovery that could be the most important scientific breakthrough of our time. What is Kundalini? The rediscovery of a hidden but powerful mechanism that is helping us solve the riddle of consciousness."

And it WILL be the most scientific discovery of our time, in the dawning of the new Mayan Cycle, that is.

A post-2012 paradigm shift in consciousness...essentially what the Mayan Calendar and Dec. 21, 2012 always represented.

I thought that people that were in to science were supposed to not be so close-minded and approach things from an evolutionary-discovery point of view. Unlike you, Mr. Writer and GuerrillaBedlam. You think you've got it all figured out already. That's not Science. I think it's time for you to humble yourself out and surrender to the fact that this is emerging and it's not going away. And you're only setting yourself up to look more and more a fool in the long run when I'm posting scientific Kundalini peer-reviews on here and you'll have nothing left to argue.

Just because the research is in the underground phases does not mean that it's not emerging into the science world. It's part of the evolutionary paradigm shift of the times. The post-2012 times. Everything in science was once underground or thought impossible before it became part of science. Learn how to put 2 + 2 together.

And yes, you're right. The scientific verification of Kundalini WILL CHANGE THE FACE OF SCIENCE AND BEYOND, and will be a perfect bridge between Science and Spirituality. Part of the post-2012 evolution and Revolution.

And regarding the Mayan Calendar, it's in the same boat as Kundalini and the others that I have mentioned. Notice how underground it really is. It's not even in this forum's spell-check. But there is a growing awareness that will only exponentially increase now that we are in the new Mayan Cycle especially. I imagine that the more that we continue to UNDERSTAND the Mayan Calendar the more we will realize how correct it truly is and the Cosmic implications that it has. Due to and in an almost instinctual response to our planetary crisis, the growing Scientific awareness of these things that I have mentioned will happen as a paradigm shift in consciousness continues to unravel.

And like you already said, get ready for the religious upheaval that you mentioned...in 2015-2017. It's part of the change in Astrology for the collective. Saturn is finally moving out of Scorpio and in to Sagittarius. Expect religious upheaval and tensions between opposing paradigms, and revolution.

And let's not forget about the emergence of intelligent alien species becoming a reality as well.

 

One other little tidbit that I want to add is that I wonder how much the Science nuts on this thread even understand how much of an Alchemist Isaac Newton actually was? He was actually more of an Alchemist than anything else. He kept this a secret in order to solidify his name as the founder of modern science and to avoid scrutiny. It's just very amusing to me how much Science people disregard anything that's Metaphysical, Esoteric, etc. as all just mere nonsense. And please don't ignorantly assume that Alchemy was just about attempting to transmute lead into Gold. It was and is a lot more than that.

 

bump...Mr. Writer did you or did you not see the peer-review scientific study that I posted?

 

Chirp chirp, Writer! I know that you're posting on other stuff throughout the Hipforums so quit being a coward and respond to the peer review that I posted. Respond to the Science that is beginning to take place.

 

Gee...some uprise all across America just tonight because of Ferguson case...finally America will be swept.

 

The article was lovely. it dealt with many of my favorite concepts, such as panpsychism, the nature of "free will", and zazen. I see one of its contributors is from the Kurzweil Institute, a place and a person I admire as well (creator of the "technological singularity" thought experiment).

Very nice (but very heady) read, and I look forward to more research in this area.

See, that's ^ a scientific attitude. You saying "KUNDALINI IS COMING MY FRIEND AND YOU WILL LOOK LIKE A FOOL" makes you sound like someone standing on a box on a crowded street yelling verses from the book of revelations. If kundalini comes, and is found through reason and evidence, then I will not look like a fool, because I will listen to reason and examine the evidence and come to my own conclussions. I appreciate your concern in the matter.

But zooming back out, you know this STILL has nothing to do with 2012, right? You know things like conscious interference in physics experiments dates back decades, while things like panpsychism and zazen date back centuries? So sorry, you can't throw a whole bunch of different shit together and think that because I agree with some of it that I agree with all of it.

 

It's up to each person to make their own decision of what is true. What's throwing random stuff together for you is what is a bunch of connections for me. Just because you don't get the connections, doesn't mean it's not real.

And you guys have been acting like I'm the fool actually. So, when Kundalini is verified in this new age from Science it will have to do with 2012, whether you get that or not. Kundalini isn't COMING by the way. It's been around for ages. What's coming is the merging of Science and Spirituality. And of course, when that comes, there will be some new argument about why it's still not about 2012 when I've been predicting a lot of this stuff prior to it happening, and showing why it's about 2012.

 

And even in that peer-review they mention how difficult it is for Science to come to grips with a lot of those notions. Yes some of that stuff has already existed but the point that's being made is that only now is it starting to be studied by Science. Which was the original claim that I made when you started asking me to post peer reviews.

But the fact remains is that Science doesn't = the only truth. 2012 is also about a counterculture of people mythologically creating and weaving in a new era of existence. To argue that that somehow isn't valid in any way, shape, or form, because it's a "man-made" phenomena is ridiculous. There's no way to Scientifically measure certain things but to argue that they aren't real just because of that is nonsense.