This is obviously written from a Christain prespective; it is very insightful. It's two parts. The Problem of Faith
Are you sure it's me who is?
I think you mean "omniscience" not omnipotence.
So you must *believe* the propositions "God is omnipresent" and "God is omnipotent," and "God is spirit," etc., before you can know the propositon...
Why if the laws of nature are absolute does it entail that God not exist?
Argh! Dang you and your long posts...I'll have to take this in pieces for now. If you look back at my earlier posts, I said that to "know X" was...
I do take the Scriptures as authority, but only because I take God as an authority, and Scripture as His special revelation. I would say that this...
Well, I'm glad that X represents a proposition for you now. Before you seemed to have a problem with me saying that X was a proposition, and that...
3DJay, I am not saying that belief precedes knowledge, what I am saying is that knowledge is belief. That when you know something it entails that...
3DJay, I honesty don't know what your answers are because your definitions are, as of yet, contradictory. If it is that clear, then why don't...
You're still not answering the questions. Your definitions are non-standard, confusing, and contradictory. This is why I am asking you questions,...
Justification is of no issue in the questions I asked, this is why you ARE missing the point. Could you please answer the two questions I asked?...
You completely missed the point, and negeleted to answer my questions. It really is raining, however because the person has been fooled in the...
I would say no, but you tell me... The first question was basically asking if S can know that p when p is false. The second, if S can know that p...
NO, no. Let's try and make this a bit simpler. What is involved in S knowing that p? If we say that a person knows that it is raining outside,...
Is one required to believe X in order to know it? Yes or no? If your answer is "no," then how can you deny the possibility of one knowing that God...
Yes, I'm equating "X" to a proposition, and we are talking about propositional knowledge. This is why you saw statements like "S knows that p"...
If belief is, as you put it, the result of knowing, then belief is not a necessary condition of knowledge. Thus, an atheist can know that God...
Again, so an atheist can know that God exist even though he doesn't believe that God exist? So it's possible that right now you know that God exist?
I don't know what you mean by "learn" here, but if you mean something like: the process by which ones forms a true belief, or the basis on which...
Separate names with a comma.
